Unicameral And Bicameral Legislations

–2/”>a >DOCTYPE html PUBLIC “-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN” “http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd”>

<br />

– Functions and crisis of accountability, delegated legislation, Legislative procedure and committees of legislature

Bicameral Legislatures

A bicameral legislature is comprised of two chambers, often described as the lower house and the upper house.
Usually, the composition of the lower chamber (with such names as the House of Representatives, House of Commons, Chamber of Deputies and Federal Assembly) is based proportionally on Population with each elected member representing the same number of citizens.
Upper chambers tend to be the smaller of the two legislative bodies.
Members of upper houses customarily serve longer terms, but frequently possess less power than their lower chamber counterparts.
The upper chamber (sometimes called the Senate, House of Lords or Federal Council) varies considerably in its composition and in the manner in which its members are selected through inheritance, appointment and indirect or direct Elections.
Some upper chambers reflect regional or state divisions, as in Germany and the United States.
Citizens often exhibit greater confidence in those upper chambers where they participate in the selection of the legislators through direct or indirect elections. In direct elections, voters cast their ballots directly for a specific candidate or for the party they wish to see in power.
With indirect elections, citizens elect local or provincial governments, who then in turn select the upper house members.
Chambers formed by direct or indirect elections, unlike appointed or heredity chambers, are more accountable to the people and, for that reason, are deemed to be more democratic.

Advantages of bicameral legislatures include their capacity to:

Formally represent diverse constituencies (e.g., state, region, ethnicity or class);
Facilitate a deliberative approach to legislation;
Hinder the passage of flawed or reckless legislation; and
Provide enhanced oversight or control of the executive branch.

The authority of the two chambers in bicameral legislatures varies widely among countries. Some countries, such as the United Kingdom, utilize a "weak" form of Bicameralism, in which one chamber enjoys superior legislative powers.
The degree of predominance differs from system to system. Some upper chambers have the power to delay or review legislation adopted by lower chambers, while the duties of upper chambers in other legislatures are solely consultative.
The United States, for example, employs a "strong" form of bicameralism in which both chambers possess equal or offsetting powers, and legislation must be received and approved by both houses

Bicameral Legislatures in India

According to the Constitution of India, the union legislative body is called the Parliament. The Hindi term for Parliament is Sansad. The Parliament includes the President and the two Houses – the Council of States (Rajya Sabha) and the House of the People (Lok Sabha). This kind of system, with two Houses, is called a bicameral legislature.

Rajya Sabha:

The Rajya Sabha (Council of States) is the Upper House of Parliament.
The House has a maximum of 250 members, out of which 12 members are nominated by the President for their expertise in specific fields of art, literature, science, and social Services.
The remaining 238 members are elected by the members of the legislative bodies from the States and Union Territories.
The Rajya Sabha is a permanent body and unlike the Lok Sabha, it cannot be dissolved at any time.

Each member of the Rajaya Sabha serves for a term of six years.
But one third of its members retire at the expiration of every two years.
The Vice-President of India is the ex-officio Chairman of the Rajya Sabha.
It, however, elects a Deputy Chairman from among its members who takes care of the day-to-day working of the House.
Both Houses have equal legislative powers except in the area of finance where the Lok Sabha is given overriding powers.

Lok Sabha

The Lok Sabha (House of the People) is the Lower House of Parliament. The members are directly elected to the House.
The electorate consists of all citizens who have attained 18 years of age and are otherwise not disqualified to vote under the law.
Under the Constitution, the maximum strength of the Lok Sabha can be 552 members.
The Constitution provides that up to 530 members would represent territorial constituencies in the states, up to 20 members would represent the Union Territories, and two members would be appointed by the President to represent the Anglo-Indian community if there is inadequate representation of the community.
The minimum age for qualification as a member of the Lok Sabha is 25 years.
Each Lok Sabha is formed for a period of five years, at the end of which the House is dissolved.
The House can be dissolved before the completion of the term or it can be extended by a Proclamation of Emergency.
The period of extension cannot exceed one year at a time.
A Speaker and a Deputy Speaker, elected by the members of the Lok Sabha, conduct day to day business. The Deputy Speaker presides during the absence of the Speaker.

Bicameral Legislatures in State

At the state level, the equivalent of the Lok Sabha is the Vidhan Sabha or Legislative Assembly; that of the Rajya Sabha is the Vidhan Parishad or Legislative Council.
A second House of legislature is considered important for two reasons: one, to act as a check on hasty actions by the popularly elected House and, two, to ensure that individuals who might not be cut out for the rough-and-tumble of direct elections too are able to contribute to the legislative process.
Opposition to the idea of Legislative Councils is centred on three broad arguments. One, they can be used to park leaders who have not been able to win an election. Two, they can be used to delay progressive legislation. Three, they would strain state finances.
Opinion in the Constituent Assembly was divided on the question of having a Legislative Council.
The idea was backed on the above grounds; it was also suggested that having a second chamber would allow for more debate and sharing of work between the Houses

Unicameral Legislatures

One-chamber, or unicameral legislatures, are most often established in countries structured on a unitary governmental system.
Unlike the federal model, where power is distributed between the central government and constituent territorial units, power in the unitary system is concentrated in one central unit.
The unitary model is generally found in geographically small countries with homogenous populations of fewer than 10 million inhabitants.
Advantages of unicameral legislatures include:

The potential to enact proposed legislation rapidly (since only one body is needed to adopt legislation thereby eliminating the need to reconcile divergent bills);
Greater accountability (since legislators cannot blame the other chamber if legislation fails to pass, or if citizens= interests are ignored);
Fewer elected officials for the population to monitor; and C reduced costs to the government and taxpayers.

Delegated Legislation

Delegation of powers means the powers passed on by the higher authority to the lower authority to make laws. Delegated legislation means the powers given by the legislature to the executive or administration to enact certain laws.
The simple meaning of the expression “delegated expression” may be: When the function of the legislation is entrusted to organs other than the legislature by the legislature itself, the legislation made by such organs is known as delegated legislation.
Delegated legislation, also referred to as secondary legislation, is legislation made by a person or body other than Parliament. Parliament, through an Act of Parliament, can permit another person or body to make legislation.
An Act of Parliament creates the framework of a particular law and tends only to contain an outline of the purpose of the Act.
By Parliament giving authority for legislation to be delegated it enables other persons or bodies to provide more detail to an Act of Parliament.
Parliament thereby, through primary legislation (i.e. an Act of Parliament), permit others to make law and rules through delegated legislation.
The legislation created by delegated legislation must be made in accordance with the purpose laid down in the Act.

Factors responsible for the Growth of Delegated Legislation

Delegated legislation is not a new phenomenon. Ever since the statutes came to be made by the Parliament, delegated legislation also came to be made by an authority to which the power was delegated by Parliament.
There has been always a need for delegated legislation.
The factors leading to the growth of delegated legislation may be summarised as below:

Parliamentary pressure

The bulk of the business of the Parliament has increased and it has no time for the consideration of complicated and technical matters.
The Parliament cannot provide the Society with the requisite quality and quantity of legislation because of lack of time.
Most of the time of the Parliament is devoted to political matters, matters of policy and particularly foreign affairs.

To meet emergency

Certain emergency situations may arise which necessitate special measures. In such cases speedy and appropriate action is required.
The Parliament cannot act quickly because of its political nature and because of the time required by the Parliament to enact the law.
In such cases quick action needs to be taken.
In times of war and other national emergencies, the executive is vested with special and extremely wide powers to deal with the situation.
There was substantial growth of delegated legislation during the two World Wars.

Technicality of subject-matter

Certain matters covered by delegated legislation are of a technical nature which requires handling by experts.
In such cases it is inevitable that powers to deal with such matters is given to the appropriate administrative agencies to be exercised according to the requirements of the subject matter.
Parliament cannot provide for such matters as the members are at best politicians and not experts in various spheres of life.
Therefore, it is convenient for the legislature to confine itself to policy statements only, as the legislators are generally ignorant of legal and technical skills.

Expediency and flexibility

The practice of delegated legislation introduces flexibility in the law.
At the time of passing any legislative enactment, it is impossible to foresee all the contingencies.
Legislative amendment is a slow and cumbersome process, but with the aid of delegated legislation, the executive can meet the situation expeditiously.

To experiment

The practice of delegated legislation enables the executive to experiment. This method permits rapid utilization of experience and implementation of necessary changes in application of the provisions in the Light of such experience.
Experiments can be made and experience can be profitability utilized.
A law passed by Parliament has to be in force till the next session of the Parliament when it can be repealed.
In situations, which require frequent adjustments, experimentation is the only answer.

To meet unforeseen contingencies

Parliament while deciding upon a certain course of action cannot foresee the difficulties, which may be encountered in its execution.
Accordingly various statutes contain a 'removal of difficulty clause' empowering the administration to remove such difficulties by exercising the powers of making rules and regulations.
These clauses are always so worded that very wide powers are given to the administration.

Merits of Delegated Legislation

Saves parliamentary time.
Government Ministers often consult interested bodies and parties before drafting statutory instruments.
Delegated legislation is more flexible than an Act of Parliament. It can be passed quickly and easily amended or revoked, so that the law is up to date. Therefore, it allows rapid change.
Delegated legislation helps in removing the difficulty clause and meet unforeseen emergencies expeditiously.
Also helps in meeting situations of emergency and thus helps in reducing parliamentary pressure.

Demerits of Delegated Legislation

Delegated legislation is not well publicised in contrast to debates on Bills in Parliament.
Parliament has insufficient time to scrutinise the laws. Parliament is not reviewing legislation properly.
Sub-delegation of powers a further problem, which causes complexity and confusion. It is impossible for anyone to keep abreast of all delegated legislation.
The large volume of delegated legislation produced every year (some 3,000 statutes annually) means that it is very difficult for Members of Parliament, let alone the general public, to keep up to date with the present law. This is exacerbated by the fact that delegated legislation is made in private, unlike Acts of Parliament which are made following public debates in Parliament.

Procedure of Law Making in Indian Parliament

Law making process in Indian Parliament

The Indian constitution gives the law making procedure in Indian Parliament. The primary function of the Indian Parliament is to make, fresh laws and to revise or abrogate existing laws.
Bills passed by the Parliament falls into two categories:

Money bills
non-money or, ordinary or, public bills.

The procedures prescribed by the constitution for passing the two categories of bills are different.
Procedure of passing ordinary or public bills-An ordinary bill has to pass through different stages before becoming an Act. An ordinary bill may be introduced in either House of the Parliament.
The first stage is the introduction or the firstly reading of the bill. Most such bills are introduced by ministers. They are drafted by technical experts and approved by the Council of Ministers. Ordinary members of the Parliament may also introduce bills. One month’s notice has to be given to the speaker or, the chairman of the Rajya Sabha before the introduction of the bill. Then on a date fixed by the speaker or the chairman, the mover rises on his seat to move the bill. This is the introduction or the first reading of the bill which is a formal affair. No debate usually takes place at this stage. But on an unusual bill, for example the bill on Preventive Detention in 1954 may be opposed by the opposition at its very introduction. After introduction, the bill is published in the Gazette of India. The speaker or, the chairman may allow some bills to be gazette even before the first reading. Such hills do not require formal introduction in the Parliament.
The next stage in the life of a bill is the Second Reading which usually takes place after an interval of two days after the first reading. At this stage, any of the four courses are adopted.

The bill may be taken for consideration by the House at once.
It may be sent to a select committee of the House.
It may be sent to a joint select committee of the two Houses and
It may be circulated for eliciting public opinion. Very rarely bills are taken up for consideration straight way.

When the 4th course is adopted, the secretariat of the House concerned request the State Governments to publish the bill in the State Gazettes inviting opinions from local bodies and recognized associations. Such opinions are circulated among the members of the House.

Committee stage

If the bill is referred to a select committee, the mover selects the members of the committee, the Speaker or the Chairman appoints one member of the committee, the chairman of the committee.
The committee makes a careful study of the bill and reports back to the House.

Report Stage

The original bill along with the report of the Select committee is circulated among the members. It is at this stage that the bill is debated clause by clause. At two stages in the career of a bill debates take place. In the Second Reading when the bill is debated in principle and at the report stage, when it is debated clause by clause. The Second Reading is most crucial in the life of the bill while the Report stage is most important as giving final shape to the bill. After the bill is passed by a majority vote, it is submitted for the Third Reading.

The Third Reading like the First Reading is only formal. No debate takes place and no bill is rejected at this stage.
After the bill is adopted at the Third Reading, it’s transmitted to the other House where it goes through all the stages as in the originating House. The other House may accept the bill. In that case it is sent to the President for his assent. The other House also may reject the bill or, may introduce amendments not acceptable to the original House or, may not return the bill within six months. In any of such case, a constitutional deadlock develops between the two Houses. The President may call a joint session of the two Houses to resolve the deadlock. The Speaker or in his absence the Deputy Speaker presides over such joint sessions. The deadlock is dissolved by majority vote.
Finally the bill passed by both Houses goes to the President for his assent. If the President assents to the bill, it becomes a law. The President may return the bill for reconsideration. If the bill is sent back to the President with or, without amendments, the President cannot withhold his assent. This complicated and time consuming procedure is adopted to prevent hasty legislation.

Parliamentary Committees

The Functions of Parliament are not only varied in nature, but considerable in volume. The time at its disposal is limited. It cannot make very detailed scrutiny of all legislative and other matters that come up before it. A good deal of Parliamentary business is, therefore, transacted in the committees.

Both Houses of Parliament have a similar committee structure, with a few exceptions. Their appointment, terms of office, functions and procedure of conducting business are also more or less similar and are regulated as per rules made by the two Houses under ARTICLE 118(1) of the Constitution.
Broadly, Parliamentary Committees are of two kinds – Standing Committees and Ad Hoc Committees. The former are elected or appointed every year or periodically and their work goes on, more or less, on a continuous basis. The latter are appointed on an ad hoc basis as need arises and they cease to exist as soon as they complete the task assigned to them.

Standing Committees:

Among the Standing Committees, the three Financial Committees – Committees on Estimates, Public Accounts and Public Undertakings – constitute a distinct group as they keep an unremitting vigil over Government expenditure and performance. While members of the Rajya Sabha are associated with Committees on Public Accounts and Public Undertakings, the members of the Committee on Estimates are drawn entirely from the Lok Sabha.
The Estimates Committee reports on 'what economies, improvements in organisation, efficiency or administrative reform consistent with policy underlying the estimates' may be effected. It also examines whether the money is well laid out within limits of the policy implied in the estimates and suggests the form in which estimates shall be presented to Parliament.
The Public Accounts Committee scrutinises appropriation and finance accounts of Government and reports of the Comptroller and Auditor-General. It ensures that public money is spent in accordance with Parliament's decision and calls attention to cases of waste, extravagance, loss or nugatory expenditure.
The Committee on Public Undertakings examines reports of the Comptroller and Auditor-General, if any. It also examines whether public undertakings are being run efficiently and managed in accordance with Sound business principles and prudent commercial practices.
Besides these three Financial Committees, the Rules Committee of the Lok Sabha recommended setting-up of 17 Department Related Standing Committees (DRSCs). Accordingly, 17 Department Related Standing Committees were set up on 8 April 1993. In July 2004, rules were amended to provide for the constitution of seven more such committees, thus raising the number of DRSCs from 17 to 24. The functions of these Committees are:

To consider the Demands for Grants of various Ministries/Departments of Government of India and make reports to the Houses;
To examine such Bills as are referred to the Committee by the Chairman, Rajya Sabha or the Speaker, Lok Sabha, as the case may be, and make reports thereon;
To consider Annual Reports of ministries/departments and make reports thereon; and
To consider policy documents presented to the Houses, if referred to the Committee by the Chairman, Rajya Sabha or the Speaker, Lok Sabha, as the case may be, and make reports thereon.

Other Standing Committees in each House, divided in terms of their functions, are

Committees to Inquire:

Committee on Petitions examines petitions on bills and on matters of general public interest and also entertains representations on matters concerning subjects in the Union List;
Committee of Privileges examines any question of privilege referred to it by the House or Speaker/Chairman;

Committees to Scrutinise:

Committee on Government Assurances keeps track of all the assurances, promises, undertakings, etc., given by Ministers in the House and pursues them till they are implemented;
Committee on Subordinate Legislation scrutinises and reports to the House whether the power to make regulations, rules, sub-rules, bye-laws, etc., conferred by the Constitution or Statutes is being properly exercised by the delegated authorities; and
Committee on Papers Laid on the Table examines all papers laid on the table of the House by Ministers, other than statutory notifications and orders which come within the purview of the Committee on Subordinate Legislation, to see whether there has been compliance with the provisions of the Constitution, Act, rule or regulation under which the paper has been laid;

Committees relating to the day-today business of the House:

Business Advisory Committee recommends allocation of time for items of Government and other business to be brought before the Houses;
Committee on Private Members’ Bills and Resolutions of the Lok Sabha classifies and allocates time to Bills introduced by private members, recommends allocation of time for discussion on private members’ resolutions and examines Constitution amendment bills before their introduction by private members in the Lok Sabha. The Rajya Sabha does not have such a committee. It is the Business Advisory Committee of that House which recommends allocation of time for discussion on stage or stages of private members’ bills and resolutions;
Rules Committee considers matters of procedure and conduct of business in the House and recommends amendments or additions to the Rules; and
Committee on Absence of Members from the Sittings of the House of the Lok Sabha considers all applications from members for leave or absence from sittings of the House. There is no such Committee in the Rajya Sabha. Applications from members for leave or absence are considered by the House itself;

Committee on the Welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes, on which members from both Houses serve, considers all matters relating to the welfare of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes which come within the purview of the Union Government and keeps a watch whether constitutional safeguards in respect of these classes are properly implemented;
Committees concerned with the provision of facilities to members:

General Purposes Committee considers and advises Speaker/Chairman on matters concerning affairs of the House, which do not appropriately fall within the purview of any other Parliamentary Committee; and
House Committee deals with residential accommodation and other amenities for members;

Joint Committee on Salaries and Allowances of Members of Parliament, constituted under the Salary, Allowances and Pension of Members of Parliament Act, 1954, apart from framing rules for regulating payment of salary, allowances and pension to Members of Parliament, also frames rules in respect of amenities like medical, housing, telephone, postal, constituency and secretarial facility;
Joint Committee on Offices of Profit examines the composition and character of committees and other bodies appointed by the Central and State governments and Union Territories Administrations and recommends what offices ought to or ought not to disqualify a person from being chosen as a member of either House of Parliament;
The Library Committee consisting of members from both Houses, considers matters concerning the Library of Parliament;
On 29 April 1997, a Committee on Empowerment of Women with members from both the Houses was constituted with a view to securing, among other things, status, dignity and Equality for women in all fields;
On 4 March 1997, the Ethics Committee of the Rajya Sabha was constituted. The Ethics Committee of the Lok Sabha was constituted on 16 May 2000.

Ad hoc Committees:

Such Committees may be broadly classified under two heads:

Committees which are constituted from time to time, either by the two Houses on a motion adopted in that behalf or by Speaker/Chairman to inquire into and report on specific subjects
Select or Joint Committees on Bills which are appointed to consider and report on a particular Bill. These Committees are distinguishable from the other ad hoc committees inasmuch as they are concerned with Bills and the procedure to be followed by them as laid down in the Rules of Procedure and Directions by the Speaker/Chairman

A unicameral legislature is a legislature with only one chamber or house. A bicameral legislature is a legislature with two chambers or houses.

The advantages of a unicameral legislature include:

It is simpler and more efficient than a bicameral legislature.
It is more democratic, as all members of the legislature are elected by the people.
It is more responsive to the needs of the people, as it can pass laws more quickly.

The disadvantages of a unicameral legislature include:

It can be dominated by a single party or group, which can lead to tyranny of the majority.
It can be less deliberative than a bicameral legislature, as there is only one chamber to debate and vote on laws.
It can be less representative of the people, as it is possible for a majority of the people to be represented by a minority of the members of the legislature.

The advantages of a bicameral legislature include:

It provides a system of checks and balances, as the two chambers can each veto laws passed by the other.
It allows for representation of different interests, as each chamber can represent different groups of people or different parts of the country.
It allows for more deliberation, as laws must be passed by both chambers before they can become law.

The disadvantages of a bicameral legislature include:

It is more complex and less efficient than a unicameral legislature.
It can be less democratic, as not all members of the legislature are elected by the people.
It can be less responsive to the needs of the people, as it can take longer to pass laws.

Examples of unicameral legislatures include:

The National Assembly of France
The House of Commons of the United Kingdom
The Knesset of Israel
The National Assembly of India
The National People’s Congress of China

Examples of bicameral legislatures include:

The United States Congress
The Parliament of Canada
The Australian Parliament
The German Bundestag and Bundesrat
The Italian Parliament

The history of unicameral and bicameral legislatures dates back to ancient times. The first known unicameral legislature was the Athenian Assembly, which was established in the 5th century BC. The first known bicameral legislature was the Roman Senate, which was established in the 8th century BC.

The future of unicameral and bicameral legislatures is uncertain. Some people believe that unicameral legislatures are more efficient and democratic, while others believe that bicameral legislatures provide a better system of checks and balances. It is likely that the debate over unicameral and bicameral legislatures will continue for many years to come.

What is a unicameral legislature?

A unicameral legislature is a legislative body with only one chamber or house. The term unicameral comes from the Latin words unus, meaning “one,” and camera, meaning “chamber.”

What are some examples of unicameral legislatures?

Some examples of unicameral legislatures include the National Assembly of France, the Federal Assembly of Switzerland, and the National Parliament of South Africa.

What are the advantages of a unicameral legislature?

Some advantages of a unicameral legislature include:

It is simpler and more efficient than a bicameral legislature.
It is more democratic, as all members of the legislature are elected by the people.
It is more responsive to the needs of the people, as it can pass laws more quickly.

What are the disadvantages of a unicameral legislature?

Some disadvantages of a unicameral legislature include:

It can be dominated by a single party or faction.
It can be less deliberative than a bicameral legislature, as there is only one chamber to debate and vote on laws.
It can be less representative of the people, as it is not always possible to ensure that all regions or interests are represented in the legislature.

What is a bicameral legislature?

A bicameral legislature is a legislative body with two chambers or houses. The term bicameral comes from the Latin words bis, meaning “twice,” and camera, meaning “chamber.”

What are some examples of bicameral legislatures?

Some examples of bicameral legislatures include the United States Congress, the Parliament of the United Kingdom, and the National People’s Congress of China.

What are the advantages of a bicameral legislature?

Some advantages of a bicameral legislature include:

It can provide a check on the power of the other chamber.
It can represent different interests in society.
It can provide a more deliberative process for lawmaking.

What are the disadvantages of a bicameral legislature?

Some disadvantages of a bicameral legislature include:

It can be more complex and less efficient than a unicameral legislature.
It can be more difficult to pass laws, as both chambers must agree.
It can be more expensive to operate.

What is the difference between a unicameral legislature and a bicameral legislature?

The main difference between a unicameral legislature and a bicameral legislature is that a unicameral legislature has only one chamber, while a bicameral legislature has two chambers.

What are the pros and cons of each type of legislature?

There are pros and cons to both unicameral and bicameral legislatures. Unicameral legislatures are simpler and more efficient, but they can be dominated by a single party or faction. Bicameral legislatures are more deliberative and can represent different interests in society, but they can be more complex and less efficient.

Which type of legislature is better?

There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question. The best type of legislature for a particular country will depend on a variety of factors, such as the country’s political system, its history, and its culture.

Question 1

Which of the following is not a type of legislature?

(A) Unicameral
(B) Bicameral
(C) Tricameral
(D) Quadricameral

Answer
(D) Quadricameral

A unicameral legislature is a legislature with only one chamber. A bicameral legislature is a legislature with two chambers. A tricameral legislature is a legislature with three chambers.

Question 2

Which of the following countries has a unicameral legislature?

(A) United States
(B) United Kingdom
(C) France
(D) India

Answer
(A) United States

The United States has a unicameral legislature called the United States Congress. It is made up of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Question 3

Which of the following countries has a bicameral legislature?

(A) Canada
(B) Australia
(C) Japan
(D) Germany

Answer
(A) Canada

Canada has a bicameral legislature called the Parliament of Canada. It is made up of the Senate and the House of Commons.

Question 4

Which of the following countries has a tricameral legislature?

(A) South Africa
(B) Nigeria
(C) Kenya
(D) Uganda

Answer
(A) South Africa

South Africa has a tricameral legislature called the Parliament of South Africa. It is made up of the National Assembly, the National Council of Provinces, and the President.

Question 5

Which of the following is an advantage of a unicameral legislature?

(A) It is more efficient than a bicameral legislature.
(B) It is more representative of the people than a bicameral legislature.
(C) It is more accountable to the people than a bicameral legislature.
(D) It is more flexible than a bicameral legislature.

Answer
(A) It is more efficient than a bicameral legislature.

A unicameral legislature is more efficient than a bicameral legislature because it has only one chamber. This means that it can pass laws more quickly and easily.

Question 6

Which of the following is an advantage of a bicameral legislature?

(A) It is more efficient than a unicameral legislature.
(B) It is more representative of the people than a unicameral legislature.
(C) It is more accountable to the people than a unicameral legislature.
(D) It is more flexible than a unicameral legislature.

Answer
(B) It is more representative of the people than a unicameral legislature.

A bicameral legislature is more representative of the people than a unicameral legislature because it has two chambers. This means that it can represent the interests of different groups of people.

Question 7

Which of the following is an advantage of a tricameral legislature?

Answer
(D) It is more flexible than a bicameral legislature.

A tricameral legislature is more flexible than a bicameral legislature because it has three chambers. This means that it can adapt to changes in society more easily.