S.S Tarapore Committee

The S.S. Tarapore Committee: A Pivotal Moment in India’s Financial History

The S.S. Tarapore Committee, formally known as the Committee on Capital Account Convertibility, played a pivotal role in shaping India’s financial landscape. Established in 1997 under the chairmanship of Dr. S.S. Tarapore, a former Deputy Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the committee was tasked with examining the feasibility of making the Indian Rupee fully convertible on the capital account. This article delves into the committee’s recommendations, its impact on India’s economic policies, and its enduring legacy.

The Context: India’s Economic Reforms and the Need for Capital Account Convertibility

The late 1990s marked a crucial period in India’s economic history. The country was undergoing a significant liberalization process, driven by the economic reforms initiated in 1991. These reforms aimed to open up the Indian economy to global markets, attract foreign investment, and promote economic growth.

Capital account convertibility, the ability to freely convert domestic currency into foreign currency and vice versa for capital transactions, was seen as a crucial step in this liberalization process. It was believed that full convertibility would:

• Attract foreign investment: By making it easier for foreign investors to invest in India, capital account convertibility was expected to boost foreign direct investment (FDI) and portfolio investment.
• Enhance financial market efficiency: Full convertibility would allow for greater integration of Indian financial markets with global markets, leading to increased liquidity and efficiency.
• Promote economic growth: By facilitating capital flows, convertibility was expected to stimulate investment and economic growth.

However, concerns about the potential risks associated with full convertibility also existed. These included:

• Volatility in the exchange rate: Full convertibility could lead to increased volatility in the exchange rate, making it difficult for businesses to plan and invest.
• Speculative capital flows: Uncontrolled capital flows could lead to speculative bubbles and financial instability.
• Loss of control over monetary policy: Full convertibility could limit the RBI’s ability to control monetary policy, potentially leading to inflation.

The Tarapore Committee’s Recommendations: A Cautious Approach

The Tarapore Committee, recognizing both the potential benefits and risks of capital account convertibility, adopted a cautious approach in its recommendations. The committee proposed a phased approach to full convertibility, with the first phase focusing on achieving current account convertibility, which allows for the free flow of funds for trade and services.

Table 1: Key Recommendations of the Tarapore Committee

The committee also emphasized the need for strong macroeconomic fundamentals, prudential regulations, and adequate foreign exchange reserves before moving towards full capital account convertibility.

The Impact of the Tarapore Committee’s Report: A Mixed Bag

The Tarapore Committee’s report sparked a debate on the merits and risks of capital account convertibility in India. While the report was widely discussed and debated, its recommendations were not fully implemented.

Partial Convertibility and the Gradual Approach:

The government adopted a gradual approach to capital account convertibility, focusing on achieving partial convertibility in the short term. This involved easing restrictions on foreign investment and allowing for greater freedom in capital flows.

Focus on Macroeconomic Stability:

The government also prioritized strengthening macroeconomic fundamentals, focusing on fiscal consolidation, inflation control, and building foreign exchange reserves. This approach aimed to create a more stable environment for capital flows.

Limited Implementation of Full Convertibility:

Despite the progress made in partial convertibility, the government did not fully implement the Tarapore Committee’s recommendations for achieving full capital account convertibility. This was due to concerns about the potential risks associated with full convertibility, particularly in the wake of the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98.

Table 2: Key Developments in Capital Account Convertibility in India

The Legacy of the Tarapore Committee: A Lasting Influence

Despite not fully implementing the Tarapore Committee’s recommendations, the committee’s report had a lasting impact on India’s financial policy.

A Framework for Gradual Liberalization:

The Tarapore Committee’s phased approach to capital account convertibility provided a framework for gradual liberalization of the capital account. This approach allowed the government to manage the risks associated with convertibility while gradually opening up the economy to foreign investment.

Emphasis on Macroeconomic Stability:

The committee’s emphasis on strong macroeconomic fundamentals and prudential regulations has continued to guide India’s financial policies. The government has consistently focused on maintaining fiscal discipline, controlling inflation, and building foreign exchange reserves.

Ongoing Debate on Full Convertibility:

The debate on full capital account convertibility continues in India. While some argue that full convertibility is necessary to attract more foreign investment and promote economic growth, others remain concerned about the potential risks.

The Future of Capital Account Convertibility in India:

The future of capital account convertibility in India remains uncertain. The government’s approach will likely continue to be cautious and gradual, with a focus on maintaining macroeconomic stability and managing the risks associated with full convertibility.

Conclusion: A Pivotal Moment in India’s Financial History

The S.S. Tarapore Committee’s report was a pivotal moment in India’s financial history. It provided a framework for gradual liberalization of the capital account, emphasizing the importance of strong macroeconomic fundamentals and prudential regulations. While the committee’s recommendations were not fully implemented, its report has had a lasting influence on India’s financial policies. The debate on full capital account convertibility continues, and the government’s approach will likely remain cautious and gradual, balancing the potential benefits with the risks.

Here are some frequently asked questions about the S.S. Tarapore Committee:

1. What was the main objective of the S.S. Tarapore Committee?

The S.S. Tarapore Committee, formally known as the Committee on Capital Account Convertibility, was established to examine the feasibility of making the Indian Rupee fully convertible on the capital account. This meant allowing free conversion of domestic currency into foreign currency and vice versa for capital transactions.

2. What were the key recommendations of the Tarapore Committee?

The committee recommended a phased approach to full convertibility, starting with achieving full current account convertibility (allowing free flow of funds for trade and services). They then proposed partial capital account convertibility in a gradual and controlled manner, focusing on attracting long-term foreign investment. Full capital account convertibility was recommended only after meeting specific criteria, including strong macroeconomic fundamentals, well-developed financial markets, robust prudential regulations, and adequate foreign exchange reserves.

3. Why did the Tarapore Committee recommend a phased approach to capital account convertibility?

The committee recognized both the potential benefits and risks of full convertibility. A phased approach allowed for gradual liberalization, allowing the government to manage the risks associated with capital flows while opening up the economy to foreign investment.

4. What were the main concerns about full capital account convertibility in India at the time?

Concerns included:

• Volatility in the exchange rate: Full convertibility could lead to increased volatility in the exchange rate, making it difficult for businesses to plan and invest.
• Speculative capital flows: Uncontrolled capital flows could lead to speculative bubbles and financial instability.
• Loss of control over monetary policy: Full convertibility could limit the RBI’s ability to control monetary policy, potentially leading to inflation.

5. Were the Tarapore Committee’s recommendations fully implemented?

No, the government adopted a gradual approach to capital account convertibility, focusing on achieving partial convertibility in the short term. They prioritized strengthening macroeconomic fundamentals and building foreign exchange reserves. Full capital account convertibility was not implemented due to concerns about the potential risks, particularly in the wake of the Asian financial crisis of 1997-98.

6. What is the current status of capital account convertibility in India?

India has achieved partial capital account convertibility, with significant liberalization of foreign investment and capital flows. However, full convertibility remains a topic of debate, with the government continuing to adopt a cautious and gradual approach.

7. What is the legacy of the Tarapore Committee?

The Tarapore Committee’s report provided a framework for gradual liberalization of the capital account, emphasizing the importance of strong macroeconomic fundamentals and prudential regulations. Its recommendations have had a lasting influence on India’s financial policies, even though full convertibility was not implemented.

8. What are the potential benefits of full capital account convertibility for India?

Potential benefits include:

• Attracting foreign investment: Full convertibility could attract more foreign direct investment (FDI) and portfolio investment.
• Enhancing financial market efficiency: Full convertibility could lead to greater integration of Indian financial markets with global markets, increasing liquidity and efficiency.
• Promoting economic growth: By facilitating capital flows, full convertibility could stimulate investment and economic growth.

9. What are the potential risks of full capital account convertibility for India?

Potential risks include:

• Increased volatility in the exchange rate: This could make it difficult for businesses to plan and invest.
• Speculative capital flows: Uncontrolled capital flows could lead to speculative bubbles and financial instability.
• Loss of control over monetary policy: Full convertibility could limit the RBI’s ability to control monetary policy, potentially leading to inflation.

10. What is the future of capital account convertibility in India?

The future of capital account convertibility in India remains uncertain. The government’s approach will likely continue to be cautious and gradual, with a focus on maintaining macroeconomic stability and managing the risks associated with full convertibility.

Here are a few multiple-choice questions (MCQs) about the S.S. Tarapore Committee, with four options each:

1. What was the primary objective of the S.S. Tarapore Committee?

a) To recommend policies for increasing agricultural productivity in India.
b) To examine the feasibility of making the Indian Rupee fully convertible on the capital account.
c) To investigate the causes of the 1991 economic crisis in India.
d) To propose reforms for the Indian banking sector.

2. Which of the following was NOT a key recommendation of the Tarapore Committee?

a) Achieving full current account convertibility within a short timeframe.
b) Introducing partial capital account convertibility in a gradual and controlled manner.
c) Implementing full capital account convertibility immediately without any preconditions.
d) Emphasizing the need for strong macroeconomic fundamentals before moving towards full convertibility.

3. What was the main reason for the government’s decision to NOT fully implement the Tarapore Committee’s recommendations?

a) The government believed that full convertibility would lead to excessive inflation.
b) The government was concerned about the potential risks associated with full convertibility, particularly in the wake of the Asian financial crisis.
c) The government felt that the committee’s recommendations were not practical or feasible.
d) The government was focused on other priorities at the time, such as poverty reduction.

4. Which of the following is NOT a potential benefit of full capital account convertibility for India?

a) Attracting more foreign direct investment (FDI).
b) Enhancing financial market efficiency.
c) Reducing the risk of speculative capital flows.
d) Promoting economic growth.

5. What is the current status of capital account convertibility in India?

a) India has achieved full capital account convertibility.
b) India has achieved partial capital account convertibility, with significant liberalization of foreign investment and capital flows.
c) India has not made any progress towards capital account convertibility.
d) India has decided to abandon the idea of capital account convertibility altogether.

Answers:

1. b)
2. c)
3. b)
4. c)
5. b)