Recommendations of Sarkaria Commission

The Sarkaria Commission: A Legacy of Recommendations for Federalism in India

The Indian Constitution, a testament to the nation’s commitment to federalism, has been a subject of continuous debate and evolution. The delicate balance between the Centre and the States, enshrined in the document, has been tested and refined over the years, leading to the establishment of various commissions to address specific concerns. One such commission, the Sarkaria Commission, played a pivotal role in shaping the discourse on federalism in India, leaving behind a legacy of recommendations that continue to influence the relationship between the Centre and the States.

The Genesis of the Sarkaria Commission

The Sarkaria Commission, formally known as the Commission on Centre-State Relations, was appointed by the Indian government in 1983 under the chairmanship of Justice Rajinder Sachar, a former judge of the Supreme Court of India. The commission was tasked with examining the working of the federal system in India and recommending measures to strengthen it. This appointment came at a time when tensions between the Centre and the States were escalating, fueled by issues like the allocation of resources, the implementation of central policies, and the erosion of state autonomy.

The commission’s mandate was broad, encompassing a wide range of issues related to federalism, including:

• The distribution of powers between the Centre and the States: This included examining the division of legislative powers, the scope of concurrent powers, and the role of the Union List, State List, and Concurrent List.
• The financial relations between the Centre and the States: This involved analyzing the existing system of revenue sharing, the allocation of grants, and the role of the Finance Commission.
• The administrative relations between the Centre and the States: This included examining the role of the Governor, the appointment of state officials, and the implementation of central policies at the state level.
• The role of the judiciary in federalism: This involved analyzing the role of the Supreme Court in resolving disputes between the Centre and the States.

The Sarkaria Commission’s Recommendations: A Blueprint for Federalism

The Sarkaria Commission, after extensive consultations and deliberations, submitted its report in 1988, outlining a comprehensive set of recommendations aimed at strengthening the federal system in India. These recommendations, while not legally binding, have had a significant impact on the Centre-State relations and continue to be debated and implemented in various forms.

The commission’s recommendations can be broadly categorized into the following areas:

1. Distribution of Powers:

• Respect for State Autonomy: The commission emphasized the need for the Centre to respect the autonomy of the States and avoid encroaching upon their powers. It recommended that the Centre should refrain from interfering in the day-to-day administration of the States and should only intervene in exceptional circumstances.
• Strengthening the State List: The commission recommended that the State List should be strengthened by adding more subjects to it, thereby increasing the powers of the States. It also suggested that the Concurrent List should be reviewed to ensure that it does not lead to an erosion of state autonomy.
• Role of the Governor: The commission recommended that the Governor should act as a constitutional head of the State and should not be used as a tool of the Centre to interfere in state affairs. It also suggested that the Governor should be appointed in consultation with the Chief Minister of the State.

2. Financial Relations:

• Fairer Revenue Sharing: The commission recommended that the existing system of revenue sharing should be reviewed to ensure that the States receive a fairer share of the central taxes. It also suggested that the Finance Commission should be given a more independent role in determining the allocation of resources between the Centre and the States.
• Increased Grants: The commission recommended that the Centre should provide more grants to the States, particularly for development projects. It also suggested that the grants should be allocated on the basis of objective criteria, such as population, poverty, and backwardness.
• Financial Autonomy: The commission emphasized the need for the States to have greater financial autonomy. It recommended that the States should be given more flexibility in raising their own revenues and that the Centre should not impose undue financial burdens on them.

3. Administrative Relations:

• Coordination and Cooperation: The commission recommended that the Centre and the States should work together in a spirit of coordination and cooperation. It suggested that regular meetings should be held between the Centre and the States to discuss issues of common concern.
• Inter-State Councils: The commission recommended the establishment of Inter-State Councils to facilitate cooperation and coordination between the States. These councils would provide a platform for the States to discuss issues of common interest and to resolve disputes amicably.
• Role of the All India Services: The commission recommended that the role of the All India Services should be reviewed to ensure that they do not undermine the autonomy of the States. It suggested that the States should have a greater say in the appointment and transfer of All India Service officers.

4. Role of the Judiciary:

• Respect for Federalism: The commission emphasized the need for the judiciary to respect the principles of federalism. It recommended that the Supreme Court should exercise its powers with caution and should not interfere in the day-to-day administration of the States.
• Dispute Resolution: The commission recommended that the Supreme Court should play a more active role in resolving disputes between the Centre and the States. It suggested that the court should develop a more robust framework for resolving such disputes.

The Impact of the Sarkaria Commission’s Recommendations

The Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations have had a significant impact on the Centre-State relations in India. While some of the recommendations have been implemented, others have been met with resistance from both the Centre and the States.

Implementation of Recommendations:

• Inter-State Councils: The commission’s recommendation for the establishment of Inter-State Councils was implemented, and these councils have played a significant role in fostering cooperation and coordination between the States.
• Financial Autonomy: The commission’s recommendation for greater financial autonomy for the States has been partially implemented. The States have been given more flexibility in raising their own revenues, but the Centre continues to exercise significant control over the allocation of resources.
• Role of the Governor: The commission’s recommendations regarding the role of the Governor have been largely accepted, and the Governor is now generally seen as a constitutional head of the State.

Resistance to Recommendations:

• Distribution of Powers: The commission’s recommendations regarding the distribution of powers between the Centre and the States have been met with resistance from both sides. The Centre has been reluctant to cede more powers to the States, while the States have been demanding greater autonomy.
• Role of the All India Services: The commission’s recommendations regarding the role of the All India Services have been met with resistance from the Centre, which sees these services as essential for maintaining national unity.
• Role of the Judiciary: The commission’s recommendations regarding the role of the judiciary have been met with mixed reactions. While the judiciary has generally respected the principles of federalism, there have been instances where it has intervened in state affairs.

The Legacy of the Sarkaria Commission

The Sarkaria Commission’s report remains a landmark document in the history of Indian federalism. Its recommendations have provided a framework for understanding the complex relationship between the Centre and the States and have helped to shape the discourse on federalism in India.

Key Contributions:

• Emphasis on State Autonomy: The commission’s emphasis on state autonomy has been a significant contribution to the debate on federalism in India. It has helped to ensure that the States have a greater say in their own affairs.
• Framework for Dispute Resolution: The commission’s recommendations regarding dispute resolution have provided a framework for resolving conflicts between the Centre and the States.
• Strengthening Inter-State Relations: The commission’s recommendation for the establishment of Inter-State Councils has helped to strengthen inter-state relations and to promote cooperation between the States.

Challenges and Future Directions:

Despite its significant contributions, the Sarkaria Commission’s report has also faced challenges. The implementation of its recommendations has been uneven, and the debate on federalism in India continues.

• Evolving Federalism: The nature of federalism in India is constantly evolving, and the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations may need to be revisited in light of new challenges and opportunities.
• Emerging Issues: New issues, such as climate change, terrorism, and economic globalization, have emerged since the Sarkaria Commission’s report was submitted. These issues require a new approach to federalism, one that emphasizes cooperation and coordination between the Centre and the States.
• Need for Consensus: The Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations were based on a consensus between the Centre and the States. However, this consensus has eroded in recent years, leading to increased tensions between the two levels of government.

Conclusion

The Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations have left an enduring legacy on the Indian federal system. While some of its recommendations have been implemented, others remain a subject of debate. The commission’s report has provided a valuable framework for understanding the complex relationship between the Centre and the States and has helped to shape the discourse on federalism in India. As India continues to evolve, the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations will continue to be relevant, providing a roadmap for navigating the challenges and opportunities of federalism in the 21st century.

Table: Key Recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission

Note: This table provides a summary of the key recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission. It is not exhaustive and does not cover all the recommendations made by the commission.

Frequently Asked Questions on the Sarkaria Commission’s Recommendations

Here are some frequently asked questions about the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations:

1. What was the main purpose of the Sarkaria Commission?

The Sarkaria Commission, formally known as the Commission on Centre-State Relations, was appointed in 1983 to examine the working of the federal system in India and recommend measures to strengthen it. The commission aimed to address growing tensions between the Centre and the States, particularly regarding the distribution of powers, financial resources, and administrative relations.

2. What were some of the key recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission?

The Sarkaria Commission made a wide range of recommendations, including:

• Strengthening State Autonomy: The commission emphasized respecting state autonomy and recommended adding more subjects to the State List, thereby increasing state powers.
• Fairer Revenue Sharing: The commission advocated for a fairer system of revenue sharing between the Centre and the States, with the Finance Commission playing a more independent role in resource allocation.
• Increased Grants: The commission recommended providing more grants to the States, particularly for development projects, based on objective criteria like population and poverty levels.
• Establishment of Inter-State Councils: The commission recommended creating Inter-State Councils to facilitate cooperation and coordination between the States.
• Role of the Governor: The commission emphasized the Governor’s role as a constitutional head of the State, not a tool of the Centre to interfere in state affairs.

3. Were all the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations implemented?

While some recommendations were implemented, others faced resistance from both the Centre and the States. For example, the establishment of Inter-State Councils was implemented, while recommendations regarding the distribution of powers and the role of the All India Services faced significant resistance.

4. What is the legacy of the Sarkaria Commission?

The Sarkaria Commission’s report remains a landmark document in the history of Indian federalism. Its recommendations have provided a framework for understanding the complex relationship between the Centre and the States and have shaped the discourse on federalism in India. However, the implementation of its recommendations has been uneven, and the debate on federalism continues.

5. Are the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations still relevant today?

The Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations remain relevant in many ways, particularly regarding the need for greater state autonomy, fairer resource allocation, and improved coordination between the Centre and the States. However, new challenges like climate change, terrorism, and economic globalization require a new approach to federalism, one that emphasizes cooperation and coordination.

6. What are some of the challenges to implementing the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations?

Challenges to implementing the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations include:

• Evolving Federalism: The nature of federalism in India is constantly evolving, requiring a re-evaluation of the commission’s recommendations.
• Emerging Issues: New issues require a new approach to federalism, one that addresses these challenges effectively.
• Lack of Consensus: The consensus between the Centre and the States that existed during the commission’s time has eroded, leading to increased tensions.

7. What are some future directions for federalism in India?

Future directions for federalism in India include:

• Strengthening Cooperative Federalism: Emphasizing cooperation and coordination between the Centre and the States to address shared challenges.
• Promoting Fiscal Federalism: Ensuring a fairer and more equitable distribution of resources between the Centre and the States.
• Empowering States: Providing greater autonomy to the States to address their specific needs and priorities.

8. What is the significance of the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations in the context of Indian federalism?

The Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations are significant because they provide a framework for understanding and strengthening the federal system in India. They highlight the importance of state autonomy, fair resource allocation, and cooperation between the Centre and the States. While the implementation of these recommendations has been uneven, they continue to be relevant and provide a roadmap for navigating the challenges and opportunities of federalism in India.

Here are a few multiple-choice questions (MCQs) on the recommendations of the Sarkaria Commission, with four options each:

1. What was the primary objective of the Sarkaria Commission?

a) To recommend a new constitution for India.
b) To examine and strengthen the federal system in India.
c) To investigate corruption in the Indian government.
d) To review the role of the judiciary in India.

2. Which of the following was NOT a key recommendation of the Sarkaria Commission?

a) Strengthening the State List to increase state powers.
b) Establishing Inter-State Councils to promote cooperation.
c) Abolishing the All India Services to enhance state autonomy.
d) Ensuring a fairer system of revenue sharing between the Centre and the States.

3. What was the commission’s stance on the role of the Governor?

a) The Governor should act as a representative of the Centre in the state.
b) The Governor should be appointed by the President without consultation with the state.
c) The Governor should act as a constitutional head of the state, respecting state autonomy.
d) The Governor should have the power to dismiss the state government at will.

4. Which of the following statements accurately reflects the impact of the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations?

a) All recommendations were fully implemented, leading to a significant shift in power towards the states.
b) The commission’s recommendations had no impact on the Centre-State relations.
c) Some recommendations were implemented, while others faced resistance, leading to a mixed impact.
d) The commission’s recommendations were rejected outright by both the Centre and the states.

5. What is a key challenge to implementing the Sarkaria Commission’s recommendations in the present day?

a) The lack of a strong central government to enforce the recommendations.
b) The absence of any significant tensions between the Centre and the states.
c) The emergence of new challenges like climate change and terrorism that require a different approach to federalism.
d) The lack of interest in federalism among the Indian population.

Answers:

1. b) To examine and strengthen the federal system in India.
2. c) Abolishing the All India Services to enhance state autonomy.
3. c) The Governor should act as a constitutional head of the state, respecting state autonomy.
4. c) Some recommendations were implemented, while others faced resistance, leading to a mixed impact.
5. c) The emergence of new challenges like climate change and terrorism that require a different approach to federalism.