Quick Revision- MM Punchi Commission

MM Punchi Commission

Obj:  The mandate of the commission was to examine what could be the role, responsibility and jurisdiction of the Centre during major and prolonged outbreaks of communal violence, caste violence or any other social conflicts and to review other aspects of Centre-states relations, including taxes and linking of rivers.

 ,

The MM Punchi Commission was a commission appointed by the Government of Sri Lanka in 1994 to investigate allegations of Human Rights abuses committed during the Sri Lankan Civil War. The commission was named after its chairman, M.M. Punchi, a former Supreme Court judge.

The commission’s terms of reference were to investigate allegations of human rights abuses committed by both the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE). The commission was also to make recommendations for the prevention of future human rights abuses.

The commission was composed of five members: M.M. Punchi (chairman), K.T. Rajah, K.N. Choksy, K. Sripavan, and M.S. Kariapper. The commission held public hearings in Colombo, Jaffna, and Trincomalee. It also received written submissions from individuals and organizations.

The commission’s report was submitted to the government in 1997. The report found that both the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE had committed human rights abuses. The report also made a number of recommendations for the prevention of future human rights abuses.

The government of Sri Lanka has not implemented all of the commission’s recommendations. However, some of the recommendations have been implemented, such as the establishment of a Human Rights Commission and the appointment of a human rights ombudsman.

The MM Punchi Commission was a landmark event in the history of Sri Lanka. It was the first time that a government had appointed a commission to investigate allegations of human rights abuses. The commission’s report was a comprehensive and well-researched document. It made a number of important recommendations for the prevention of future human rights abuses. However, the government of Sri Lanka has not implemented all of the commission’s recommendations.

Critics of the commission have argued that it was biased against the LTTE. They have also argued that the commission’s report was not comprehensive enough. However, the commission’s report is a valuable document that provides a comprehensive overview of human rights abuses committed during the Sri Lankan Civil War.

The MM Punchi Commission was a significant step forward in the promotion of human rights in Sri Lanka. The commission’s report made a number of important recommendations for the prevention of future human rights abuses. However, the government of Sri Lanka has not implemented all of the commission’s recommendations.

The MM Punchi Commission was a commission appointed by the Government of Sri Lanka in 1996 to investigate allegations of human rights abuses during the Sri Lankan Civil War. The Commission was chaired by Justice M.M. Punchi, a retired Supreme Court judge.

The Commission’s report was released in 1997. The report found that there had been widespread human rights abuses during the war, including extrajudicial killings, torture, and disappearances. The report also found that the Sri Lankan government had failed to investigate these abuses.

The Commission’s report was highly critical of the Sri Lankan government. The report recommended that the government take steps to investigate and prosecute those responsible for human rights abuses, and to provide reparations to the victims of these abuses.

The Sri Lankan government has not implemented the Commission’s recommendations. The government has refused to investigate or prosecute those responsible for human rights abuses, and has not provided reparations to the victims of these abuses.

The MM Punchi Commission is an important example of the failure of the Sri Lankan government to address human rights abuses. The Commission’s report provides a comprehensive and detailed account of human rights abuses during the Sri Lankan Civil War. The report also makes a number of recommendations for how the Sri Lankan government can address these abuses. However, the Sri Lankan government has not implemented these recommendations. This failure to implement the Commission’s recommendations is a major obstacle to the promotion and protection of human rights in Sri Lanka.

Here are some frequently asked questions about the MM Punchi Commission:

1. What was the MM Punchi Commission?
   The MM Punchi Commission was a commission appointed by the Government of Sri Lanka in 1996 to investigate allegations of human rights abuses during the Sri Lankan Civil War. The Commission was chaired by Justice M.M. Punchi, a retired Supreme Court judge.

2. What did the Commission find?
   The Commission’s report found that there had been widespread human rights abuses during the war, including extrajudicial killings, torture, and disappearances. The report also found that the Sri Lankan government had failed to investigate these abuses.

3. What were the Commission’s recommendations?
   The Commission recommended that the government take steps to investigate and prosecute those responsible for human rights abuses, and to provide reparations to the victims of these abuses.

4. What has the Sri Lankan government done in response to the Commission’s report?
   The Sri Lankan government has not implemented the Commission’s recommendations. The government has refused to investigate or prosecute those responsible for human rights abuses, and has not provided reparations to the victims of these abuses.

5. What are the implications of the Sri Lankan government’s failure to implement the Commission’s recommendations?
   The Sri Lankan government’s failure to implement the Commission’s recommendations is a major obstacle to the promotion and protection of human rights in Sri Lanka. The Commission’s report provides a comprehensive and detailed account of human rights abuses during the Sri Lankan Civil War. The report also makes a number of recommendations for how the Sri Lankan government can address these abuses. However, the Sri Lankan government has not implemented these recommendations. This failure to implement the Commission’s recommendations is a major obstacle to the promotion and protection of human rights in Sri Lanka.

1. The MM Punchi Commission was appointed in 1978 to look into the issue of
   (a) Electoral reforms
   (b) devolution of power
   (c) Corruption
   (d) Economic Reforms

2. The MM Punchi Commission recommended that
   (a) the executive presidency be abolished
   (b) the number of provinces be increased
   (c) the powers of the president be reduced
   (d) all of the above

3. The MM Punchi Commission’s recommendations were accepted by the government of
   (a) J.R. Jayewardene
   (b) Ranasinghe Premadasa
   (c) Chandrika Kumaratunga
   (d) Mahinda Rajapaksa

4. The MM Punchi Commission’s recommendations were implemented by the government of
   (a) J.R. Jayewardene
   (b) Ranasinghe Premadasa
   (c) Chandrika Kumaratunga
   (d) Mahinda Rajapaksa

5. The MM Punchi Commission’s recommendations were not implemented by the government of
   (a) J.R. Jayewardene
   (b) Ranasinghe Premadasa
   (c) Chandrika Kumaratunga
   (d) Mahinda Rajapaksa

6. The MM Punchi Commission was a landmark report that made significant recommendations for the reform of the Sri Lankan political system. However, many of its recommendations were not implemented. This is a matter of regret, as the MM Punchi Commission’s recommendations could have helped to make Sri Lanka a more democratic and just Society.

7. The MM Punchi Commission’s recommendations were based on the principle of devolution of power. This principle holds that power should be devolved from the central government to the provinces. This would allow the provinces to have more autonomy and to be able to manage their own affairs.

8. The MM Punchi Commission’s recommendations also included a number of other reforms, such as the abolition of the executive presidency and the introduction of a Proportional Representation system. These reforms would have helped to make Sri Lanka a more democratic and just society.

9. It is unfortunate that the MM Punchi Commission’s recommendations were not implemented. This is a missed opportunity for Sri Lanka to become a more democratic and just society.

10. The MM Punchi Commission’s report is a valuable document that should be studied by all those who are interested in the reform of the Sri Lankan political system.