Indra Sawhney Case

The Indra Sawhney Case was a landmark case in the history of affirmative action in India. The case was decided by the Supreme Court of India in 1992, and it upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action programs in India. The case was brought by Indra Sawhney, a woman who was denied admission to the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) because she was not a member of a reserved category. Sawhney argued that the IIT’s affirmative action program was unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear her case.

The Supreme Court’s decision in the Indra Sawhney Case was a major victory for affirmative action in India. The Court ruled that affirmative action programs are constitutional, but that they must be narrowly tailored to achieve their intended purpose. The Court also ruled that affirmative action programs must be reviewed periodically to ensure that they are still necessary.

The Indra Sawhney Case has had a significant impact on affirmative action in India. The case has helped to ensure that affirmative action programs are constitutional and that they are narrowly tailored to achieve their intended purpose. The case has also helped to ensure that affirmative action programs are reviewed periodically to ensure that they are still necessary.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is the Indra Sawhney Case?
   The Indra Sawhney Case was a landmark case in the history of affirmative action in India. The case was decided by the Supreme Court of India in 1992, and it upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action programs in India.

2. Who was Indra Sawhney?
   Indra Sawhney was a woman who was denied admission to the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) because she was not a member of a reserved category. Sawhney argued that the IIT’s affirmative action program was unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court agreed to hear her case.

3. What was the Supreme Court’s decision in the Indra Sawhney Case?
   The Supreme Court’s decision in the Indra Sawhney Case was a major victory for affirmative action in India. The Court ruled that affirmative action programs are constitutional, but that they must be narrowly tailored to achieve their intended purpose. The Court also ruled that affirmative action programs must be reviewed periodically to ensure that they are still necessary.

4. What has been the impact of the Indra Sawhney Case on affirmative action in India?
   The Indra Sawhney Case has had a significant impact on affirmative action in India. The case has helped to ensure that affirmative action programs are constitutional and that they are narrowly tailored to achieve their intended purpose. The case has also helped to ensure that affirmative action programs are reviewed periodically to ensure that they are still necessary.

MCQs

1. The Indra Sawhney Case was a landmark case in the history of affirmative action in India. True or False?
   True

2. The case was decided by the Supreme Court of India in 1992. True or False?
   True

3. The case upheld the constitutionality of affirmative action programs in India. True or False?
   True

4. The case was brought by Indra Sawhney, a woman who was denied admission to the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) because she was not a member of a reserved category. True or False?
   True

5. The Supreme Court’s decision in the Indra Sawhney Case was a major victory for affirmative action in India. True or False?
   True

6. The case has helped to ensure that affirmative action programs are constitutional and that they are narrowly tailored to achieve their intended purpose. True or False?
   True

7. The case has also helped to ensure that affirmative action programs are reviewed periodically to ensure that they are still necessary. True or False?
   True