Appointment of Judges of Supreme Court
The Supreme Court of India is the highest court in the country. It has a total of 34 judges, including the Chief Justice of India. The judges are appointed by the President of India on the advice of the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of India.
The appointment process is a long and complex one. It begins with the President inviting the Chief Justice of India to recommend names for the vacant positions. The Chief Justice then consults with other judges of the Supreme Court and with the Attorney General of India. After this, the Chief Justice submits a list of names to the President.
The President then consults with the Prime Minister and other members of the Union Cabinet. After this, the President makes the final decision on the appointment of the judges.
The appointment of judges to the Supreme Court is a very important process. The judges of the Supreme Court have the power to interpret the Constitution and to decide on the constitutionality of laws. They also have the power to review the decisions of lower courts.
The appointment of judges to the Supreme Court is a political process. The President is elected by the people, and the Prime Minister is appointed by the President. The members of the Union Cabinet are also appointed by the President.
The appointment of judges to the Supreme Court is a controversial process. There have been many cases where the appointment of judges has been challenged in court. In some cases, the courts have overturned the appointments of judges.
The appointment of judges to the Supreme Court is a complex and important process. It is a political process, and it is a controversial process. However, it is a process that is essential to the functioning of the Indian democracy.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Who appoints the judges of the Supreme Court?
The President of India appoints the judges of the Supreme Court on the advice of the Prime Minister and the Chief Justice of India.
- How many judges are there in the Supreme Court?
There are a total of 34 judges in the Supreme Court, including the Chief Justice of India.
- What is the process for appointing judges to the Supreme Court?
The process for appointing judges to the Supreme Court is a long and complex one. It begins with the President inviting the Chief Justice of India to recommend names for the vacant positions. The Chief Justice then consults with other judges of the Supreme Court and with the Attorney General of India. After this, the Chief Justice submits a list of names to the President.
The President then consults with the Prime Minister and other members of the Union Cabinet. After this, the President makes the final decision on the appointment of the judges.
- What are the qualifications for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court?
A person must be a citizen of India and must have been a judge of a High Court for at least five years, or must have been an advocate of a High Court for at least ten years, to be eligible for appointment as a judge of the Supreme Court.
- What are the powers of the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court has the power to interpret the Constitution and to decide on the constitutionality of laws. It also has the power to review the decisions of lower courts.
- What are the functions of the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court has the following functions:
- To decide on the constitutionality of laws
- To review the decisions of lower courts
- To settle disputes between the states
- To decide on cases involving the fundamental rights of citizens
- To act as a court of appeal
- What are the challenges faced by the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court faces a number of challenges, including:
- The increasing workload of the court
- The lack of resources
- The politicization of the appointment process
- The lack of public trust in the court
- What are the reforms needed in the Supreme Court?
The Supreme Court needs a number of reforms, including:
- Increasing the number of judges
- Providing more resources to the court
- Making the appointment process more transparent
- Increasing public trust in the court