Agrarian Distress And Mitigation

<<2/”>a >body>



Agrarian Distress and Mitigation

More than 35,000 farmers marched to Mumbai from Nashik last week demanding loan waivers as well as the implementation of the Forest Rights Act (FRA). The FRA allows for land up to four hectares to be granted to families who have traditionally cultivated those plots. Having the land in their names would make these families eligible for institutional credit from banks. Even farm loan waivers only apply to those who have taken credit from cooperative and nationalised banks. While the Maharashtra government accepted most of the demands of the protesting farmers, the larger underlying issues of the agitation—rural distress, debt burden  farmer suicides and the efficacy of the FRA—need to be continually interrogated.

Across the country, farmers are furious—and rightfully so. conditions in agriculture have got worse. Earlier problems have worsened as farm incomes have been squeezed by slower output Growth, higher costs and increased vulnerability to a changing Climate. And there is a slew of new problems resulting directly from government policies.

Small and marginal farmers toil right through the day to eke out a living by selling whatever little they produce — their primary lifeline. Their second lifeline is Livestock which they can count on as a dependable liquid asset. Two recent government steps have aggravated their sense of despondency. While demonetisation and its slow replacement have snapped their first lifeline, confusion and uncertainty surrounding the trade of livestock have rendered the second one unreliable.

This distress situation is not one of the farmers’ making alone. Along with the vagaries of the weather, governments — past and present — too must share the blame. The major share of the farming cost, mostly raised through loans, goes to the government much before the farmer earns a rupee. Therefore, the first thing a government can do – and without any Corruption and discrimination – is to do away with all direct and indirect taxes on agricultural inputs such as Fertilizers, pesticides, seeds, agricultural tools and implements, power and electricity, packing materials, and local taxes. Such a drastic but direct intervention will help the farmer grow his produce at a lower cost, reduce his need for borrowings and bring down rural indebtedness.

Exorbitantly high taxes on diesel have increased transportation costs, which constitute the single largest component of the end consumer price of many farm products. Therefore, to facilitate a remunerative price to the farmers and contain Inflation, taxes on diesel, and on a whole set of vehicles primarily meant for transport of “peoples’ goods” need full exemption. Movement of “peoples’ goods” must be completely exempted from road tolls, and all direct and indirect Central, State and local taxes. Herein lies a long-term economic solution to the problem but it calls for strong political will to implement.

Even though the National Commission on Farmers, better known as the Swaminathan Commission, was set up by the UPA regime, there was no real effort to implement its recommendations, and the second UPA tenure did nothing to take these ideas forward. They may have been too politically contentious and economically demanding to be adopted within the neoliberal economic paradigm.   

After all, the commission proposed extensive Land reforms: including distributing ceiling surplus and waste lands, preventing diversion of prime agricultural land and forest to the corporate sector for non-agricultural purposes, and ensuring grazing rights and access to common property Resources. It argued that higher productivity in agriculture could only be achieved with substantial increases in public Investment, especially in Irrigation, drainage, land development, water conservation, and promotion of conservation farming and Biodiversity-2/”>Biodiversity. It proposed comprehensive groundwater and surface-water management, to give all farmers sustained and equitable access.

The commission emphasized the expansion of formal credit outreach to the poor and needy in rural areas; reduction of interest rates on institutional loans to 4% Simple Interest (with government support), a moratorium on debt recovery, including loans from non-institutional sources, and the waiver of interest on loans in distress areas and during calamities. On the insurance front, it suggested that an integrated credit-cum-crop-livestock-human Health insurance package should cover the entire country and all crops, with reduced premiums, along with an agriculture risk fund to provide relief to farmers after natural calamities.

There were specific recommendations for Women farmers, not only for joint landholding pattas, but to recognize women as farmers for kisan credit cards and other programmes of the Central and state governments. To stabilize crop prices and make them remunerative, the commission proposed significant improvements in the implementation of minimum support prices (MSPs), and effective extension to other crops, including Millets and other nutritious Cereals. The recommendation that the MSP should be at least 50% more than the weighted Average cost of production was made in this report.

Increasing incomes.

Agricultural transformation is very slow in India. Therefore, the process of generating higher income from agriculture is also slow. Production increase was the main objective than raising incomes. It is welcoming that Prime Minister Narendra Modi proposes doubling the income of farmers by 2022—a paradigm shift. This will require several things: An aggressive push to improve technologies by strengthening the seed sector and knowledge dissemination system; agricultural diversification in favor of high value commodities and the development of value chains by linking production and Marketing centers; and finally, developing mechanisms to ensure minimum support prices in the event of crash in farm harvest prices. Success will depend on how farmers are aggregated for production and marketing through promotion of Contract Farming, cluster farming, farmer producer organizations and self-help groups.

Generating EMPLOYMENT opportunities.

The Situation Assessment of India reported that more than 40 percent of farmers would like to quit agriculture if alternative opportunities were available. Agriculture is becoming crowded and does not provide regular employment opportunities. In the absence of regular employment in rural areas, the rural Population, especially youth, is migrating to urban areas to explore better opportunities and income. By 2020, people aged 15-34 will make up 34 percent of India’s population; currently, more than 70 percent of India’s youth lives in rural areas. Their energy and enthusiasm need to be tapped in ways that meet their aspirations and transform agriculture and rural economies. But agriculture per se will not be able absorb the growing number of youth in rural areas. Incentives should be provided in these areas: Aggregating raw and processed products (one example: Lijjat Papad, which employs more than 43,000 women); self-employment in agro-processing, agro-advisory, agriculture and rural transport, etc.; private sector engagement in custom-hire Services, secondary and tertiary processing; location-specific non-farm employment in Micro, Small and Medium enterprises, linked with the large manufacturing sector; and engagement in government programs, schools, and agriculture extension.

Reducing risks in agriculture

The risks farmers face have been increasing for years. Both production and price risks are creating ongoing agrarian distress. The incidences of droughts, floods, temperature fluctuations, and unseasonal rains and hailstorms are increasing and adversely affecting agricultural production. But even during normal years, farm harvest prices have fallen steeply, badly affecting farmer incomes. The prime minister’s National Agricultural Insurance Scheme is now in place to cover some production losses. Though this scheme is good, the compensation is insufficient and does not cover the risk of falling prices. The government should consider launching a “Prime Minister’s Climate Resilience Scheme” that covers both production and price risks. Such an approach could bundle promotion of Climate-Smart Agriculture with value added weather advisory services and effective implementation of agricultural insurance, helping to ensure minimum support prices.

Developing agri-Infrastructure-2/”>INFRASTRUCTURE

Agri-infrastructure—including agricultural markets, cold storage, warehouses, and agro-processing—has not developed in corresponding speed with rising agricultural production. The pace of agri-infrastructure is far behind what it is needed to improve the overall agri-food system. In the past, more focus was given to the production of agricultural commodities. In the absence of adequate agri-infrastructure, the supply chains of agri-food commodities are in the hands of an unorganized, fragmented, and inefficient sector. A better- organized private sector is emerging slowly due to the lack of commercial viability to develop agri-infrastructure. The role of public-private partnerships (PPP) is immense in developing agri-infrastructure for high economic and social gains. The government should form a commission to develop modalities and proposals for public-private partnerships in the agri-infrastructure sector. Many lessons can be learned from PPP’s excellent track record in the construction of national highways, the building and functioning of Airports, the distribution of power, and other areas. These can be applied in developing rural agri-markets, cold storage, agro-processing, surface irrigation, and agricultural extension, and other Elements of agri-infrastrucure. The central government should contribute to the efforts of individual states to develop such viable PPP projects.

Improving quality of rural life

Rural India is still missing basic amenities (including sanitation, hygiene, drinking water, drainage, schooling, and health centers). Three years ago, the prime minister encouraged each member of parliament and the state assemblies to adopt one village and work to transform it into a model village. The main objective was to provide all basic facilities to improve the Quality Of Life in rural areas. The late former President A. P. J. Abdul Kalam originated a similar concept, Provision of Urban Amenities to Rural Areas (PURA), with the aim of providing urban infrastructure and services in rural hubs to create economic opportunities. The scheme should be revived to improve the quality of life in rural areas. In addition, the several programs and schemes that exist to build social and economic infrastructure should be united for larger impact.


,

Agrarian distress is a term used to describe the economic and social hardship faced by farmers and rural communities. It can be caused by a number of factors, including low crop prices, high input costs, natural disasters, and government policies. Agrarian distress can lead to a number of problems, including POVERTY, Malnutrition, and social unrest.

There are a number of measures that can be taken to mitigate agrarian distress. These include providing farmers with access to credit, land, and water; investing in agricultural research and development; and providing support for rural infrastructure.

There are a number of case studies that illustrate the impact of agrarian distress. One example is the case of the farmers’ suicides in India. In recent years, there have been thousands of cases of farmers taking their own lives due to economic hardship. Another example is the case of the landless peasants in Brazil. These peasants have been fighting for land rights for decades, and their struggle has been met with violence and repression.

There are a number of policies and programs that have been implemented to address agrarian distress. One example is the Green Revolution, which was a program that was implemented in India in the 1960s to increase agricultural production. Another example is the Land Reform Act, which was implemented in China in the 1950s to redistribute land to the peasants.

There is a significant amount of research that has been conducted on agrarian distress. This research has examined the causes, impact, and mitigation of agrarian distress. Some of the key findings of this research include the following:

  • Agrarian distress is a widespread problem that affects millions of people around the world.
  • The causes of agrarian distress are complex and vary from country to country.
  • Agrarian distress can have a devastating impact on the lives of farmers and rural communities.
  • There are a number of effective measures that can be taken to mitigate agrarian distress.

There is a growing movement of advocacy for agrarian distress. This movement is working to raise awareness of the problem of agrarian distress and to advocate for policies and programs that will address it. Some of the key goals of this movement include the following:

  • To increase public awareness of the problem of agrarian distress
  • To advocate for policies and programs that will address the root causes of agrarian distress
  • To support the efforts of farmers and rural communities to resist exploitation and to improve their livelihoods

There is a growing level of international cooperation on agrarian distress. This cooperation is taking place through a number of channels, including international organizations, bilateral agreements, and non-governmental organizations. Some of the key goals of this cooperation include the following:

  • To share information and best practices on how to address agrarian distress
  • To support the development of policies and programs that will address agrarian distress
  • To provide technical assistance to countries that are struggling with agrarian distress

The future of agrarian distress is uncertain. However, there are a number of factors that could lead to a reduction in agrarian distress in the future. These factors include the following:

  • Increased investment in agriculture
  • Improved access to credit and markets
  • Increased agricultural productivity
  • More effective land reform
  • Stronger social safety nets

Despite the challenges, there is reason to be optimistic about the future of agrarian distress. With the right policies and programs, it is possible to reduce the suffering of millions of people around the world who are affected by this problem.

One of the most important things that can be done to address agrarian distress is to increase investment in agriculture. This investment should be used to improve infrastructure, such as roads, irrigation systems, and storage facilities. It should also be used to support research and development, so that farmers can adopt new technologies and practices.

Another important step is to improve access to credit and markets. Farmers need access to credit so that they can invest in their farms. They also need access to markets so that they can sell their produce at a fair price. Governments can help to improve access to credit and markets by providing subsidies, loans, and other forms of assistance.

Increasing agricultural productivity is another important way to address agrarian distress. This can be done by adopting new technologies, such as high-yield varieties of crops and improved irrigation systems. It can also be done by improving the Management of land and Water Resources.

Land reform is another important measure that can be taken to address agrarian distress. Land reform involves the redistribution of land from large landowners to small farmers. This can help to improve the livelihoods of small farmers and reduce poverty in rural areas.

Finally, it is important to strengthen social safety nets. Social safety nets can provide support to farmers who are struggling financially. They can also help to protect farmers from the effects of natural disasters and other shocks.

By taking these steps, it is possible to reduce the suffering of millions of people around the world who are affected by agrarian distress.

What is Agrarian Distress?

Agrarian distress is a term used to describe the economic and social problems faced by farmers and rural communities. It can be caused by a number of factors, including low crop prices, high input costs, natural disasters, and government policies.

What are the causes of Agrarian Distress?

The causes of agrarian distress are complex and vary from country to country. However, some of the most common causes include:

  • Low crop prices: Farmers often receive low prices for their crops, which can make it difficult for them to make a profit. This can be caused by a number of factors, such as oversupply, competition from imported crops, and government policies that favor large-scale agriculture.
  • High input costs: Farmers often face high costs for inputs such as seeds, fertilizer, and pesticides. This can make it difficult for them to make a profit, especially when crop prices are low.
  • Natural disasters: Natural disasters such as droughts, floods, and pests can devastate crops and livestock, leading to financial losses for farmers.
  • Government policies: Government policies can sometimes contribute to agrarian distress. For example, policies that favor large-scale agriculture over small-scale agriculture can make it difficult for small farmers to compete.

What are the consequences of Agrarian Distress?

Agrarian distress can have a number of negative consequences, including:

  • Poverty and hunger: Farmers who are unable to make a profit from their crops may fall into poverty. This can lead to hunger and malnutrition, as well as other social problems such as crime and violence.
  • Environmental Degradation: Farmers who are struggling to make a living may be forced to adopt unsustainable practices, such as overgrazing and deforestation. This can lead to environmental degradation, such as Soil erosion and Water Pollution.
  • Social unrest: Agrarian distress can lead to social unrest, as farmers become frustrated with their situation. This can manifest itself in protests, strikes, and even violence.

What are the solutions to Agrarian Distress?

There is no single solution to agrarian distress, as the problem is complex and varies from country to country. However, some of the most common solutions include:

  • Supporting small farmers: Governments can support small farmers by providing them with access to credit, training, and other resources. This can help them to improve their productivity and profitability.
  • Investing in agriculture: Governments can invest in agriculture by improving infrastructure, such as roads and irrigation systems. This can help to make agriculture more profitable and sustainable.
  • Protecting the Environment: Governments can protect the environment by enacting policies that promote Sustainable Agriculture. This can help to ensure that agriculture can continue to provide food and livelihoods for future generations.

What is the role of the international community in addressing Agrarian Distress?

The international community can play a role in addressing agrarian distress by providing financial and technical assistance to governments and farmers. This assistance can help to improve agricultural productivity, reduce poverty, and protect the environment.

The international community can also help to raise awareness of the problem of agrarian distress and promote policies that address it. This can be done through advocacy, research, and Education.

  1. Which of the following is not a factor that contributes to agrarian distress?
    (A) Low agricultural productivity
    (B) High input costs
    (C) Low market prices for agricultural produce
    (D) Government policies that favor urban areas over rural areas

  2. Which of the following is a measure that can be taken to mitigate agrarian distress?
    (A) Providing subsidies to farmers
    (B) Investing in agricultural research and development
    (C) Providing access to credit for farmers
    (D) All of the above

  3. Which of the following is not a consequence of agrarian distress?
    (A) Rural poverty
    (B) Rural Unemployment
    (C) Rural-urban Migration
    (D) Social unrest

  4. Which of the following is a government program that aims to mitigate agrarian distress?
    (A) The Pradhan Mantri Krishi Sinchai Yojana (PMKSY)
    (B) The Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY)
    (C) The Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN)
    (D) All of the above

  5. Which of the following is a non-government organization that works to mitigate agrarian distress?
    (A) The Self-Employed Women’s Association (SEWA)
    (B) The Bharatiya Kisan Union (BKU)
    (C) The All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS)
    (D) All of the above

  6. Which of the following is a factor that has contributed to the decline in agricultural productivity in India?
    (A) The Green Revolution
    (B) The introduction of high-yield varieties of crops
    (C) The use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides
    (D) All of the above

  7. Which of the following is a measure that can be taken to improve agricultural productivity in India?
    (A) Promoting Organic Farming
    (B) Reducing the use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides
    (C) Investing in irrigation infrastructure
    (D) All of the above

  8. Which of the following is a factor that has contributed to the increase in input costs in India?
    (A) The rising cost of fuel
    (B) The rising cost of fertilizers
    (C) The rising cost of pesticides
    (D) All of the above

  9. Which of the following is a measure that can be taken to reduce input costs in India?
    (A) Providing subsidies to farmers
    (B) Investing in research and development to develop more efficient agricultural practices
    (C) Promoting the use of RENEWABLE ENERGY sources
    (D) All of the above

  10. Which of the following is a factor that has contributed to the decline in market prices for agricultural produce in India?
    (A) The opening up of the Indian economy to global trade
    (B) The rise of the middle class in India
    (C) The increase in the use of genetically modified crops
    (D) All of the above

  11. Which of the following is a measure that can be taken to increase market prices for agricultural produce in India?
    (A) Providing subsidies to farmers
    (B) Investing in Agricultural Marketing infrastructure
    (C) Promoting the use of branding and marketing to differentiate Indian agricultural produce from imported produce
    (D) All of the above

  12. Which of the following is a government policy that favors urban areas over rural areas?
    (A) The provision of subsidized housing in urban areas
    (B) The provision of employment opportunities in urban areas
    (C) The provision of education and healthcare facilities in urban areas
    (D) All of the above

  13. Which of the following is a measure that can be taken to reduce the bias in government policies towards urban areas?
    (A) Providing subsidized housing in rural areas
    (B) Providing employment opportunities in rural areas
    (C) Providing education and healthcare facilities in rural areas
    (D) All of the above

  14. Which of the following is a consequence of agrarian distress that has a negative impact on the environment?
    (A) The use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides
    (B) The clearing of forests for agricultural land
    (C) The overexploitation of water resources
    (D) All of the above

  15. Which of the following is a measure that can be taken to mitigate the negative environmental impact of agrarian distress?
    (A) Promoting organic farming
    (B) Reforestation
    (C) Water conservation
    (D) All of the above