Simon Commission

The Simon Commission: A Catalyst for Change in British India

The Simon Commission, formally known as the Indian Statutory Commission, was a landmark event in the history of British India. Appointed in 1927, the commission was tasked with reviewing the existing constitutional framework and recommending changes to the government of India. While its initial purpose was to strengthen British control, the commission’s work ultimately became a catalyst for the Indian independence movement, igniting widespread protests and fueling the demand for self-rule.

The Genesis of the Simon Commission

The Government of India Act 1919, also known as the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms, introduced a limited form of self-government in India. However, it was clear that the existing system was not sustainable. The Act had failed to address key issues such as the lack of Indian representation in the legislative councils, the limited powers of the elected members, and the continued control of the executive by the British.

In 1927, the British government decided to appoint a commission to review the existing system and propose changes. The commission was headed by Sir John Simon, a prominent British politician, and comprised seven members, all of whom were British. This decision to exclude any Indian members from the commission sparked immediate controversy and fueled the growing nationalist sentiment in India.

The Simon Commission’s Mandate and Objectives

The Simon Commission’s mandate was to examine the working of the existing constitutional framework and recommend changes to the government of India. The commission was tasked with addressing the following key issues:

• Representation: The commission was to review the existing system of representation in the legislative councils and propose changes to ensure greater Indian participation in the government.
• Powers: The commission was to examine the powers of the elected members and propose ways to enhance their authority and influence.
• Executive Control: The commission was to investigate the continued control of the executive by the British and recommend measures to transfer power to Indian hands.
• Provincial Autonomy: The commission was to consider the possibility of granting greater autonomy to the provinces.
• Federal Structure: The commission was to explore the feasibility of establishing a federal structure for India.

The Simon Commission’s Findings and Recommendations

The Simon Commission spent two years traveling across India, holding public hearings and gathering evidence from various stakeholders. The commission’s report, published in 1930, presented a detailed analysis of the existing system and proposed a series of reforms.

Key Recommendations:

• Expansion of Franchise: The commission recommended expanding the franchise to include a larger section of the Indian population, but it maintained the existing system of communal representation, which reserved seats for different religious communities.
• Increased Indian Representation: The commission proposed increasing the number of Indian members in the legislative councils and granting them greater powers.
• Limited Provincial Autonomy: The commission recommended granting limited autonomy to the provinces, but it retained significant control over key areas such as defense, foreign affairs, and finance.
• Rejection of Federal Structure: The commission rejected the idea of establishing a federal structure for India, arguing that it was not feasible at that time.

The Simon Commission and the Indian Nationalist Movement

The Simon Commission’s report was met with widespread opposition from the Indian nationalist movement. The exclusion of Indians from the commission was seen as a blatant insult and a symbol of British arrogance. The nationalist leaders, including Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru, and Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, launched a nationwide campaign against the commission, demanding complete independence from British rule.

Key Events:

• Boycott of the Commission: The Indian National Congress and other nationalist organizations boycotted the Simon Commission’s hearings, refusing to cooperate with the British.
• “Simon Go Back” Slogan: The slogan “Simon Go Back” became a rallying cry for the nationalist movement, reflecting the widespread anger and resentment against the commission.
• Mass Protests: The boycott was followed by mass protests and demonstrations across India, highlighting the growing demand for self-rule.
• The Lahore Resolution (1929): The Indian National Congress, at its Lahore session in 1929, passed a resolution demanding complete independence for India.

The Simon Commission and the Rise of Communalism

The Simon Commission’s recommendations on communal representation further fueled the growing tensions between Hindus and Muslims. The commission’s decision to maintain the existing system of separate electorates for different religious communities was seen as a divisive measure that reinforced communal identities and exacerbated religious differences.

Key Issues:

• Separate Electorates: The commission’s recommendation to retain separate electorates for Hindus and Muslims was criticized by many nationalist leaders, who argued that it would perpetuate communal divisions and hinder national unity.
• The Muslim League’s Response: The Muslim League, led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah, supported the commission’s recommendations on communal representation, arguing that it was necessary to protect the interests of the Muslim community.
• Growing Communalism: The Simon Commission’s report contributed to the growing communal tensions in India, which eventually led to the partition of the country in 1947.

The Simon Commission’s Legacy

The Simon Commission’s work had a profound impact on the course of Indian history. While its initial purpose was to strengthen British control, the commission’s work ultimately became a catalyst for the Indian independence movement. The commission’s exclusion of Indians, its recommendations on communal representation, and the widespread protests it sparked fueled the demand for self-rule and accelerated the process of decolonization.

Key Impacts:

• Rise of Nationalism: The Simon Commission’s work played a significant role in strengthening the Indian nationalist movement and galvanizing public opinion against British rule.
• Growth of Communalism: The commission’s recommendations on communal representation contributed to the growing tensions between Hindus and Muslims, which eventually led to the partition of India.
• Constitutional Reforms: The Simon Commission’s report laid the foundation for the Government of India Act 1935, which introduced a new system of governance with greater Indian participation.
• Independence Movement: The Simon Commission’s work was a crucial step in the long and arduous journey towards Indian independence.

Table: Key Events and Outcomes of the Simon Commission

Conclusion

The Simon Commission, despite its initial intentions, played a pivotal role in shaping the course of Indian history. Its exclusion of Indians, its recommendations on communal representation, and the widespread protests it sparked fueled the demand for self-rule and accelerated the process of decolonization. The commission’s legacy is a complex one, marked by both its failures and its unintended consequences. However, it remains a significant event in the history of British India, a turning point that marked the beginning of the end of British rule.

Here are some Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the Simon Commission:

1. What was the Simon Commission?

The Simon Commission, formally known as the Indian Statutory Commission, was a British-appointed commission in 1927 tasked with reviewing the existing constitutional framework and recommending changes to the government of India. It was a key event in the lead-up to India’s independence.

2. Why was the Simon Commission controversial?

The commission was controversial because it comprised only British members, excluding any Indians. This was seen as a blatant insult and a symbol of British arrogance by Indian nationalists, fueling the growing demand for self-rule.

3. What were the main recommendations of the Simon Commission?

The commission recommended expanding the franchise, increasing Indian representation in legislative councils, granting limited provincial autonomy, and rejecting the idea of a federal structure for India. It also maintained the existing system of communal representation, which reserved seats for different religious communities.

4. How did the Simon Commission impact the Indian nationalist movement?

The commission’s exclusion of Indians and its recommendations on communal representation sparked widespread protests and demonstrations across India. The “Simon Go Back” slogan became a rallying cry for the nationalist movement, highlighting the growing demand for self-rule. The commission’s work ultimately accelerated the process of decolonization.

5. What was the significance of the “Simon Go Back” slogan?

The slogan “Simon Go Back” reflected the widespread anger and resentment against the commission’s exclusion of Indians and its perceived arrogance. It became a powerful symbol of the growing nationalist sentiment and the demand for self-determination.

6. How did the Simon Commission contribute to the rise of communalism in India?

The commission’s recommendations on communal representation, particularly the retention of separate electorates for Hindus and Muslims, were seen as divisive measures that reinforced communal identities and exacerbated religious differences. This contributed to the growing tensions between Hindus and Muslims, which eventually led to the partition of India in 1947.

7. What was the impact of the Simon Commission on the Government of India Act 1935?

The Simon Commission’s report laid the foundation for the Government of India Act 1935, which introduced a new system of governance with greater Indian participation. However, the Act still retained significant control over key areas such as defense, foreign affairs, and finance.

8. What is the legacy of the Simon Commission?

The Simon Commission’s legacy is a complex one. While it was intended to strengthen British control, it ultimately became a catalyst for the Indian independence movement. Its exclusion of Indians, its recommendations on communal representation, and the widespread protests it sparked fueled the demand for self-rule and accelerated the process of decolonization.

Here are some multiple-choice questions (MCQs) about the Simon Commission, with four options each:

1. The Simon Commission was appointed in:

a) 1919
b) 1927
c) 1930
d) 1935

Answer: b) 1927

2. The Simon Commission was tasked with reviewing the:

a) Indian economy
b) British administration in India
c) Indian education system
d) Indian social reforms

Answer: b) British administration in India

3. The Simon Commission was controversial because:

a) It recommended complete independence for India.
b) It was led by a controversial figure.
c) It excluded any Indian members.
d) It was seen as a waste of time and money.

Answer: c) It excluded any Indian members.

4. The slogan “Simon Go Back” was a rallying cry for:

a) The British government
b) The Indian nationalist movement
c) The Muslim League
d) The Hindu Mahasabha

Answer: b) The Indian nationalist movement

5. The Simon Commission’s recommendations on communal representation:

a) Led to the unification of Hindus and Muslims.
b) Strengthened the demand for a united India.
c) Contributed to the growing tensions between Hindus and Muslims.
d) Had no impact on communal relations.

Answer: c) Contributed to the growing tensions between Hindus and Muslims.

6. The Simon Commission’s report laid the foundation for the:

a) Government of India Act 1919
b) Government of India Act 1935
c) Indian Independence Act 1947
d) Partition of India

Answer: b) Government of India Act 1935

7. The Simon Commission’s legacy is best described as:

a) A triumph for British rule in India.
b) A catalyst for the Indian independence movement.
c) A failure to address the needs of the Indian people.
d) A period of peace and stability in India.

Answer: b) A catalyst for the Indian independence movement.