Do you think that BIMSTEC is a parallel organization like the SAARC? What are the similarities and dissimilarities between the two? How are Indian foreign policy objectives realized by forming this new organisation?

by

Points to Remember:

  • BIMSTEC’s emergence as a sub-regional grouping.
  • Comparison of BIMSTEC and SAARC structures, memberships, and objectives.
  • India’s strategic interests in BIMSTEC.
  • Analysis of BIMSTEC’s effectiveness in achieving Indian foreign policy goals.

Introduction:

The Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) and the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) are both regional organizations aiming to foster cooperation among South Asian nations. However, BIMSTEC, formed in 1997, is often viewed as a more streamlined and potentially more effective alternative to the often-stalled SAARC. This analysis will compare and contrast the two organizations, examining whether BIMSTEC functions as a parallel organization to SAARC and how it contributes to the realization of Indian foreign policy objectives.

Body:

1. Similarities and Dissimilarities between BIMSTEC and SAARC:

| Feature | SAARC | BIMSTEC |
|—————–|—————————————|——————————————-|
| Membership | All South Asian countries | South Asian and Southeast Asian countries |
| Geographic Scope | Entire South Asia | Bay of Bengal region |
| Focus | Broad, encompassing all sectors | More focused, sector-specific cooperation |
| Decision-Making | Consensus-based, often slow | More flexible, faster decision-making |
| Effectiveness | Often hampered by internal disputes | Relatively more effective, less burdened by internal conflicts |

2. BIMSTEC as a Parallel Organization:

While BIMSTEC doesn’t explicitly aim to replace SAARC, it functions as a parallel organization in the sense that it offers an alternative platform for regional cooperation, particularly for countries seeking more efficient and less politically burdened mechanisms. SAARC’s effectiveness has been significantly hampered by persistent tensions between India and Pakistan, leading to frequent disruptions and stalled initiatives. BIMSTEC, by excluding Pakistan, offers a more streamlined approach, allowing for quicker progress on agreed-upon projects. It’s not a direct replacement but a complementary organization catering to a different set of priorities and operational dynamics.

3. Realization of Indian Foreign Policy Objectives through BIMSTEC:

India’s engagement with BIMSTEC aligns with several key foreign policy objectives:

  • Act East Policy: BIMSTEC’s inclusion of Southeast Asian countries (Myanmar, Thailand) strengthens India’s “Act East” policy, promoting connectivity and economic engagement with the region.
  • Counterbalancing China: BIMSTEC provides a platform to counter China’s growing influence in the Bay of Bengal region. By fostering economic and security cooperation among member states, India can create a more balanced regional order.
  • Economic Growth: BIMSTEC’s focus on trade, investment, and infrastructure development directly contributes to India’s economic growth by expanding market access and promoting regional integration.
  • Connectivity: BIMSTEC initiatives on transport, energy, and communication enhance regional connectivity, benefiting India’s trade and security interests.

4. Challenges and Limitations:

Despite its potential, BIMSTEC faces challenges:

  • Capacity Building: Strengthening institutional capacity and improving coordination among member states is crucial for effective implementation of projects.
  • Funding: Securing adequate funding for BIMSTEC initiatives remains a challenge.
  • Internal Conflicts: While less burdened than SAARC, internal disagreements among member states can still hinder progress.

Conclusion:

BIMSTEC functions as a parallel organization to SAARC, offering a more streamlined and effective platform for regional cooperation in the Bay of Bengal region. It significantly contributes to the realization of several key Indian foreign policy objectives, including the “Act East” policy, economic growth, and regional connectivity. While challenges remain, BIMSTEC’s relatively more agile structure and focus on specific sectors offer a promising avenue for fostering regional cooperation and promoting shared prosperity. By addressing capacity-building needs, securing adequate funding, and fostering stronger internal coordination, BIMSTEC can further enhance its effectiveness in achieving its goals and contributing to a more stable and prosperous Bay of Bengal region. This ultimately promotes holistic development and strengthens regional stability, aligning with broader principles of international cooperation and sustainable growth.