The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between :
religious rights v. civil rights
national rights v. minority rights
gender rights v. equal rights
civil and political rights v. economic, social and cultural rights
Answer is Right!
Answer is Wrong!
This question was previously asked in
UPSC CAPF – 2014
The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has historically been the debate and differing emphasis placed on civil and political rights versus economic, social, and cultural rights. Civil and political rights (such as the right to life, liberty, freedom of speech, right to vote) were often prioritized by Western liberal democracies, while economic, social, and cultural rights (such as the right to work, education, healthcare, adequate standard of living) were often championed by socialist states and developing countries. This led to debates about their universality, indivisibility, and priorities, forming a significant divide in the human rights discourse, particularly evident during the Cold War era.
Civil and political rights (First Generation Rights) include freedoms and participation in government.
Economic, social, and cultural rights (Second Generation Rights) relate to social and economic security and well-being.
The perceived tension and differing priorities between these two sets of rights have been a major point of contention.