Which one of the following is not a raster image format ?
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE
2. Which one of the following is a technique of dividing the physical mem
Which one of the following is a technique of dividing the physical memory space into multiple blocks ?
3. The result of binary subtraction between 1001 and 101 is :
The result of binary subtraction between 1001 and 101 is :
1001 (which is 9 in decimal)
– 0101 (which is 5 in decimal, added a leading zero for alignment)
——-
Starting from the rightmost bit:
1 – 1 = 0
0 – 0 = 0
0 – 1: Cannot subtract. Borrow from the leftmost digit (1). The leftmost 1 becomes 0. The borrowed 1 moves to the left, making the next position 2 (in base 2). So, we have 2 – 1 = 1.
The leftmost digit is now 0.
Result: 0100 (binary), which is 100 (binary) when the leading zero is dropped.
100 (binary) is 1*2^2 + 0*2^1 + 0*2^0 = 4 (decimal). 9 – 5 = 4.
4. Debugger is a :
Debugger is a :
5. How many input lines are there in the NOT gate ?
How many input lines are there in the NOT gate ?
6. How many bits combination is present in a Byte?
How many bits combination is present in a Byte?
7. 1 KB is equivalent to :
1 KB is equivalent to :
8. Which one of the following is a sequential electronic circuit that is
Which one of the following is a sequential electronic circuit that is used to store 1-bit information?
9. Which one of the following is not included in the Human Resource Polic
Which one of the following is not included in the Human Resource Policy of CISF ?
10. The question whether the Central Administrative Tribunal could interfe
The question whether the Central Administrative Tribunal could interfere with penalty awarded by the competent authority on the ground that it is excessive or disproportionate to the misconduct proved, was examined by the Supreme Court of India in which one of the following cases ?
– The Supreme Court held in this case that the Tribunal has the power to judicially review the findings of the disciplinary authority and the punishment imposed. However, the Tribunal should not sit as an appellate authority substituting its own view on the penalty. It should only interfere with the quantum of punishment if it is shockingly disproportionate to the misconduct proved or if there is some procedural irregularity leading to miscarriage of justice.
– Sagir Ahmad vs. State of Uttar Pradesh concerned the fundamental right to carry on trade or business and the state’s power to create monopolies.
– L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India is a landmark judgment where the Supreme Court declared the power of judicial review of the High Courts and the Supreme Court over decisions of Tribunals as part of the basic structure of the Constitution. While it dealt with the jurisdiction of Tribunals, the Parma Nanda case is more specifically about the scope of review of the proportionality of penalty by administrative tribunals.
– The principle laid down in Parma Nanda regarding the proportionality review by tribunals has been reiterated and followed in numerous subsequent judgments.