The British enacted the Arms Act (1878) as a direct response to uprisings during the 1857 period as a means to:

Restrict weapon ownership
Introduce disarmament policies
Suppress rebellions
All of the above

The correct answer is: D) All of the above.

The Arms Act (1878) was enacted by the British government as a direct response to the Indian Rebellion of 1857. The Act was designed to restrict the ownership of firearms and other weapons in India, and to introduce disarmament policies. The Act also gave the British government the power to suppress rebellions and other forms of unrest.

The Arms Act was a controversial piece of legislation, and it was met with resistance from many Indians. However, the Act remained in force until 1947, when India gained independence from British rule.

The Arms Act was a significant piece of legislation in the history of India. It was a direct response to the Indian Rebellion of 1857, and it was designed to restrict the ownership of firearms and other weapons in India. The Act also gave the British government the power to suppress rebellions and other forms of unrest. The Arms Act was a controversial piece of legislation, and it was met with resistance from many Indians. However, the Act remained in force until 1947, when India gained independence from British rule.

Option A: Restrict weapon ownership. The Arms Act (1878) restricted the ownership of firearms and other weapons in India. The Act required all firearms to be registered with the government, and it made it illegal to own certain types of firearms.

Option B: Introduce disarmament policies. The Arms Act (1878) introduced disarmament policies in India. The Act allowed the British government to confiscate firearms from individuals or groups that it considered to be a threat to public order.

Option C: Suppress rebellions. The Arms Act (1878) gave the British government the power to suppress rebellions and other forms of unrest in India. The Act allowed the government to use force to disarm individuals or groups that it considered to be a threat to public order.

Exit mobile version