The correct answer is: Only conclusion II follows.
The statement says that players who break various records in a fair way get special prizes. The conclusion I says that X will get the special prize. However, the statement does not say anything about whether X broke the world record in a fair way. In fact, the statement says that X was found to be under the influence of a prohibited drug, which suggests that X may not have broken the world record in a fair way. Therefore, conclusion I does not follow.
The conclusion II says that X will not get the special prize. This conclusion is supported by the statement, which says that players who break various records in a fair way get special prizes. Since X was found to be under the influence of a prohibited drug, it is likely that X did not break the world record in a fair way. Therefore, X will not get the special prize.
The other options are incorrect because they either do not follow from the statement or are both supported by the statement. Option A says that only conclusion I follows. This option is incorrect
64 288 64 288 64S117.2 64 74.6 75.5c-23.5 6.3-42 24.9-48.3 48.6-11.4 42.9-11.4 132.3-11.4 132.3s0 89.4 11.4 132.3c6.3 23.7 24.8 41.5 48.3 47.8C117.2 448 288 448 288 448s170.8 0 213.4-11.5c23.5-6.3 42-24.2 48.3-47.8 11.4-42.9 11.4-132.3 11.4-132.3s0-89.4-11.4-132.3zm-317.5 213.5V175.2l142.7 81.2-142.7 81.2z"/> Subscribe on YouTube