Advantage of a clamp compared to a kiln for burning bricks is that A. It takes less time for burning B. It gives more output of first class bricks C. It has less initial cost D. It is suitable when bricks are required in large numbers

It takes less time for burning
It gives more output of first class bricks
It has less initial cost
It is suitable when bricks are required in large numbers

The correct answer is: C. It has less initial cost.

A clamp is a simple, low-cost method of burning bricks. It consists of a rectangular pile of bricks, with a layer of fuel (usually wood) on top. The pile is then covered with earth or sand to create a seal. The heat from the burning fuel causes the bricks to bake.

A kiln is a more complex and expensive method of burning bricks. It consists of a chamber in which the bricks are heated to a high temperature. The kiln is usually fired with coal or gas.

The main advantage of a clamp is its low cost. A clamp can be built using materials that are readily available, such as bricks, earth, and sand. A kiln, on the other hand, requires specialized materials and equipment.

The main advantage of a kiln is its ability to produce high-quality bricks. The bricks that are produced in a kiln are usually stronger and more durable than those that are produced in a clamp.

In conclusion, the main advantage of a clamp compared to

a kiln for burning bricks is that it has less initial cost.
Exit mobile version