Right To Constitutional Remedies (1)

 Right to constitutional Remedies( writs) Writs under ARTICLE 32 of the Constitution A declaration of Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are effective judicial remedies for their enforcement. Article 32 for the enforcement of the Fundamental Rights by means of the specified writ of writs of the same nature. The purpose is to … Read more

Mandamus

Mandamus: A Powerful Tool for Enforcing Legal Rights Introduction In the intricate tapestry of legal remedies, mandamus stands out as a potent instrument for compelling public officials or other entities to perform their legal duties. This extraordinary writ, rooted in the common law tradition, serves as a vital safeguard against arbitrary or unlawful actions, ensuring … Read more

Writ Petition

The Writ Petition: A Powerful Tool for Seeking Justice in India The Indian legal system, a complex tapestry woven from common law, civil law, and religious law, offers a unique blend of tradition and modernity. Within this system, the writ petition stands as a potent instrument for safeguarding fundamental rights and ensuring justice. This article … Read more

Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court

The Writ Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court: A Powerful Tool for Justice The Supreme Court of India, the apex court of the land, stands as the guardian of the Constitution and the protector of fundamental rights. Its writ jurisdiction, enshrined in Article 32 of the Constitution, empowers it to issue writs for the enforcement of … Read more

WRITS–TYPES AND SCOPE

Writs: A Comprehensive Guide to Types and Scope Writs, in the legal context, are formal written orders issued by a court or judicial officer, commanding a person or entity to perform a specific action or refrain from doing so. They are a fundamental tool in the administration of justice, serving as a mechanism to enforce … Read more

Certiorari

The Power of Certiorari: A Journey Through the Supreme Court’s Discretionary Jurisdiction The United States Supreme Court, often referred to as the highest court in the land, is not obligated to hear every case that comes before it. Instead, it exercises a discretionary jurisdiction, meaning it can choose which cases it will review. This power … Read more

Exit mobile version