Plato
In Plato’s Republic we see one of the earliest attempts at a systematic theory of ethics. Plato wants to find a good definition for “Justice,” a good criterion for calling something “just.” Maybe justice is “telling the truth and paying one’s debts.” But no, Plato says, for sometimes it is just to withhold the truth or not return what was borrowed.
How about “Do good to one’s friends and harm to one’s enemies”? But that doesn’t work, says Plato, because any definition of justice in terms of “doing good” doesn’t tell us much. It only repeats the question, “What is good (just)?” Plato’s suggestion for “justice” is twofold: justice for the state, and justice for the soul.
Justice for the state is achieved when all basic needs are met. Three classes of people are needed: artisans and workers to produce goods, soldiers to defend the state, and rulers to organize everything. But you cannot have a just state without just men, especially just rulers. And so we must also achieve justice of the soul.
Plato believed the soul had three parts: reason, appetite, and honor. The desires of these three parts conflicted with each other. For example, we might have a thirst (appetite) for water, but resist accepting it from an enemy for fear of poison (reason). Justice of the soul requires that each part does its proper function, and that their balance is correct.
Justice of the soul merges with justice of the state in that men fall into one of the three classes depending on how the three parts of their soul are balanced. One’s class depends on early training, but mostly, persons are born brick-layers, soldiers, and kings – depending on the balance between the three parts of their soul.
To bring about the ideal state, Plato says, “philosophers become kings… or those now called kings … genuinely and adequately philosophize.” Among other things, the philosopher king is one who can see The Good, that transcendent entity to which we compare something when we call it “good.” The idea of the philosopher-king still appeals to philosophers today, though it has rarely been achieved. It is against this ideal state, ruled by philosopher kings, that Plato can compare other forms of state. The state under martial law (Sparta) is the least disastrous. Oligarchy (Corinth) and Democracy (Athens) are worse, and tyranny (Syracuse) is the worst. These problem states come from a lack of justice in the soul. For example, a state of martial law comes from the restriction of appetite by the wrong soul-part: honor instead of reason.,
Plato was a philosopher in Classical Greece and the founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher Learning in the Western world. He is widely considered the most pivotal figure in the development of philosophy, especially the Western tradition. Unlike nearly all of his philosophical contemporaries, Plato’s entire oeuvre is believed to have survived intact for over 2,400 years. Along with his teacher, Socrates, and his most famous student, Aristotle, Plato laid the very foundations of Western philosophy and science. In addition to being a foundational figure for Western science, philosophy, and mathematics, Plato has also often been cited as one of the founders of Western religion and spirituality. Friedrich Nietzsche, amongst other scholars, called Christianity “Platonism for the people”.
Plato’s dialogues have been used to teach a range of subjects, including philosophy, logic, ethics, rhetoric, religion and mathematics. His theory of Forms began a unique perspective on abstract objects that has persisted into modern times. Plato’s theory of Forms asserts that non-physical objects, called Forms, have a greater reality than physical objects. Plato’s theory of Forms has been used to explain a variety of philosophical issues, including the nature of reality, the existence of God, and the nature of knowledge.
Plato’s theory of knowledge is based on the idea that knowledge is not derived from the senses, but from the soul. Plato believed that the soul is immortal and that it has knowledge of the Forms before it is born into the physical world. When we learn something new, Plato argued, we are not really learning something new, but are simply remembering what we already knew.
Plato’s theory of the soul is one of the most important and influential aspects of his philosophy. Plato believed that the soul is immortal and that it has three parts: the rational part, the spirited part, and the appetitive part. The rational part of the soul is the highest part and is responsible for making decisions and controlling the other parts of the soul. The spirited part of the soul is responsible for courage and ambition. The appetitive part of the soul is responsible for desires and appetites.
Plato’s theory of justice is one of the most important and influential aspects of his philosophy. Plato believed that justice is the highest virtue and that it is the foundation of a good Society. Plato argued that justice is achieved when each person does what they are best at and when everyone is treated fairly.
Plato’s theory of government is one of the most important and influential aspects of his philosophy. Plato believed that the best form of government is a Monarchy, ruled by a philosopher-king. Plato argued that a philosopher-king is the only person who is qualified to rule because they have the knowledge and wisdom necessary to make good decisions.
Plato’s influence on Western thought has been immense. His ideas have been used to justify a variety of political and social systems, and his philosophy has been studied by scholars for centuries. Plato’s work continues to be relevant today, and his ideas are still debated and discussed by philosophers and academics.
Plato’s legacy is one of the most enduring in the history of philosophy. His ideas have shaped the way we think about the world and our place in it. His work continues to be studied and debated today, and his influence is still felt in many areas of our lives.
Plato’s philosophy is a complex and sophisticated system of thought. It is impossible to do justice to it in a short space. However, I hope that this ARTICLE has given you a brief overview of some of the key aspects of Plato’s thought. If you are interested in learning more about Plato, I encourage you to read his works and to study the work of the many scholars who have written about him.
What is the Theory of Forms?
The Theory of Forms is a philosophical theory of Plato’s that argues that there are two worlds: the world of appearances and the world of Forms. The world of appearances is the world we see and experience with our senses. The world of Forms is a perfect, eternal world of ideas. Plato believed that the world of Forms is more real than the world of appearances.
What is the Allegory of the Cave?
The Allegory of the Cave is a philosophical allegory that Plato uses to explain his Theory of Forms. In the allegory, Plato describes a group of people who have lived chained in a cave all of their lives. The people can only see shadows of objects that are cast on the wall of the cave by a fire behind them. The people believe that the shadows are reality. One day, one of the people is freed from the cave and is able to see the real world outside. The person is amazed by the beauty of the real world and returns to the cave to tell the other people about it. However, the other people do not believe the person and think that they are crazy.
What is the Socratic Method?
The Socratic Method is a form of inquiry and debate between individuals with opposing viewpoints based on asking and answering questions to stimulate critical thinking and to draw out ideas and underlying presuppositions. It is named after Socrates, who used it to teach his students. The Socratic Method is a form of inquiry and debate between individuals with opposing viewpoints based on asking and answering questions to stimulate critical thinking and to draw out ideas and underlying presuppositions. It is named after Socrates, who used it to teach his students.
What is the Euthyphro Dilemma?
The Euthyphro Dilemma is a philosophical dilemma that arises from a dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro in Plato’s dialogue Euthyphro. The dilemma is as follows:
- Is something good because the gods approve of it, or do the gods approve of something because it is good?
If something is good because the gods approve of it, then the goodness of something is arbitrary and dependent on the whims of the gods. If the gods approve of something because it is good, then there is an independent standard of goodness that the gods are following.
The Euthyphro Dilemma is a difficult problem that has been debated by philosophers for centuries. There is no easy answer to the dilemma, and it is one of the most important questions in philosophy.
What is the Republic?
The Republic is a Socratic dialogue written by Plato. The dialogue explores the nature of justice and the ideal state. Plato argues that the just state is one in which the people are divided into three classes: the guardians, the auxiliaries, and the workers. The guardians are the philosophers who rule the state. The auxiliaries are the soldiers who protect the state. The workers are the farmers, craftsmen, and merchants who provide for the needs of the state.
The Republic is one of the most influential works of philosophy ever written. It has been read and studied by philosophers, political theorists, and historians for centuries. The Republic is a complex and challenging work, but it is also a rewarding one. It is a work that can help us to understand the nature of justice and the ideal state.
What is the Symposium?
The Symposium is a Socratic dialogue written by Plato. The dialogue is set at a banquet in honor of the god Eros. The participants in the banquet discuss the nature of love. Socrates argues that love is the desire for beauty. He also argues that love is the desire for immortality.
The Symposium is a beautiful and moving work of philosophy. It is a work that can help us to understand the nature of love.
-
Which of the following is not one of Plato’s Forms?
(A) The Good
(B) The Beautiful
(C) The Just
(D) The True
(E) The Horse -
Which of the following is not one of Plato’s dialogues?
(A) The Republic
(B) The Symposium
(C) The Apology
(D) The Phaedo
(E) The Horse -
Plato’s theory of Forms is based on the idea that there are two worlds:
(A) The world of appearances and the world of reality
(B) The world of the senses and the world of the intellect
(C) The world of the body and the world of the soul
(D) The world of the material and the world of the immaterial
(E) The world of the good and the world of the evil -
Plato’s theory of Forms is often criticized for being:
(A) Too idealistic
(B) Too abstract
(C) Too otherworldly
(D) Too elitist
(E) All of the above -
Plato’s theory of Forms has been influential in many areas of thought, including:
(A) Philosophy
(B) Religion
(C) Art
(D) Science
(E) All of the above -
Plato’s theory of Forms has been criticized by some for being:
(A) Unfalsifiable
(B) Unverifiable
(C) Unscientific
(D) All of the above -
Plato’s theory of Forms has been defended by some for being:
(A) A valuable tool for understanding the world
(B) A way of making sense of our experience
(C) A way of grounding our values
(D) All of the above -
Plato’s theory of Forms is based on the idea that there are two worlds: the world of appearances and the world of reality. The world of appearances is the world that we experience with our senses. It is a world of change and flux. The world of reality is the world of Forms. The Forms are eternal and unchanging. They are the perfect models of which the things in the world of appearances are imperfect copies.
-
Plato’s theory of Forms has been influential in many areas of thought, including philosophy, religion, art, and science. It has been used to explain the nature of reality, the nature of knowledge, the nature of beauty, and the nature of morality.
-
Plato’s theory of Forms has been criticized by some for being unfalsifiable, unverifiable, and unscientific. However, it has also been defended by some for being a valuable tool for understanding the world, making sense of our experience, and grounding our values.