Narasimham Committee -I

Table of Contents

The Narasimham Committee – I: A Catalyst for India’s Financial Reforms

The Indian financial sector in the late 1980s and early 1990s was characterized by inefficiency, lack of competition, and a heavy reliance on government control. This led to a stagnant economy and hindered growth. Recognizing the need for radical reform, the Indian government established the Narasimham Committee – I in 1991, under the chairmanship of Dr. M. Narasimham, a former Governor of the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). This committee played a pivotal role in shaping the future of India’s financial landscape, laying the foundation for a more robust and dynamic financial system.

The Context: A Crisis and a Need for Change

The Indian economy in the early 1990s was facing a severe crisis. The Gulf War of 1990-91 had led to a sharp rise in oil prices, while a decline in foreign exchange reserves and a burgeoning fiscal deficit further aggravated the situation. The government was forced to approach the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for a bailout package, which came with stringent conditions, including structural reforms in the financial sector.

The Narasimham Committee – I was formed in this context, tasked with recommending comprehensive reforms to address the shortcomings of the Indian financial system and pave the way for economic recovery. The committee submitted its report in December 1991, outlining a roadmap for financial sector liberalization and modernization.

Key Recommendations of the Narasimham Committee – I

The Narasimham Committee – I made a series of far-reaching recommendations, covering various aspects of the financial sector, including:

1. Banking Sector Reforms:

Deregulation of Interest Rates: The committee recommended the deregulation of interest rates on deposits and loans, allowing banks to compete based on their efficiency and risk appetite. This move aimed to improve the allocation of credit and enhance the profitability of banks.
Capital Adequacy: The committee proposed the implementation of the Basel I capital adequacy norms, requiring banks to maintain a minimum capital-to-risk-weighted assets ratio. This aimed to strengthen the financial stability of banks and reduce systemic risk.
Non-Performing Assets (NPAs): The committee recommended the establishment of an Asset Reconstruction Company (ARC) to take over the NPAs of banks, allowing them to focus on their core lending activities.
Mergers and Acquisitions: The committee encouraged mergers and acquisitions among banks to create larger and more efficient institutions.
Strengthening the RBI: The committee recommended strengthening the RBI’s role as a regulator and supervisor of the banking sector.

2. Financial Sector Reforms:

Development of Financial Markets: The committee emphasized the need to develop a robust and efficient financial market infrastructure, including stock exchanges, bond markets, and derivatives markets.
Promotion of Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs): The committee recommended promoting the growth of NBFCs to diversify the financial sector and provide alternative sources of credit.
Insurance Sector Reforms: The committee suggested opening up the insurance sector to private players, allowing for greater competition and innovation.

3. Other Recommendations:

Fiscal Discipline: The committee stressed the importance of fiscal discipline and recommended measures to reduce the fiscal deficit.
Strengthening the Regulatory Framework: The committee proposed strengthening the regulatory framework for the financial sector, including the establishment of independent regulatory bodies for specific sectors.

4. Implementation of the Recommendations:

The government of India accepted most of the recommendations of the Narasimham Committee – I and implemented them through a series of legislative and regulatory measures. These included:

The Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1993: This act introduced the Basel I capital adequacy norms and allowed for the establishment of private sector banks.
The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) Act, 1992: This act established SEBI as the regulator of the securities market.
The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA) Act, 1999: This act opened up the insurance sector to private players.

Impact of the Narasimham Committee – I Recommendations

The implementation of the Narasimham Committee – I recommendations had a profound impact on the Indian financial sector. Some of the key impacts include:

Increased Competition: The deregulation of interest rates and the entry of private sector banks led to increased competition in the banking sector, resulting in improved efficiency and customer service.
Enhanced Financial Stability: The implementation of Basel I capital adequacy norms and the establishment of ARCs strengthened the financial stability of banks and reduced systemic risk.
Development of Financial Markets: The development of financial markets, including stock exchanges and bond markets, provided a platform for raising capital and managing risk.
Growth of NBFCs: The promotion of NBFCs led to the growth of alternative sources of credit, diversifying the financial sector.
Improved Financial Inclusion: The expansion of the banking sector and the development of financial markets led to improved financial inclusion, bringing financial services to a wider segment of the population.

Table 1: Key Reforms Implemented Based on Narasimham Committee – I Recommendations

Area of Reform	Key Recommendations	Implementation	Impact
Banking Sector	Deregulation of interest rates, Basel I capital adequacy norms, establishment of ARCs, mergers and acquisitions, strengthening the RBI	Banking Regulation (Amendment) Act, 1993, establishment of ARCs, mergers and acquisitions, strengthening the RBI’s regulatory framework	Increased competition, enhanced financial stability, improved efficiency
Financial Markets	Development of stock exchanges, bond markets, and derivatives markets	Establishment of SEBI, development of stock exchanges and bond markets	Increased access to capital, improved risk management, enhanced market efficiency
Insurance Sector	Opening up the insurance sector to private players	IRDA Act, 1999	Increased competition, innovation, and product diversification
Fiscal Discipline	Measures to reduce the fiscal deficit	Fiscal consolidation measures	Improved government finances, reduced debt burden
Regulatory Framework	Strengthening the regulatory framework for the financial sector	Establishment of independent regulatory bodies	Improved oversight, increased transparency, and accountability

Challenges and Limitations

Despite its significant contributions, the Narasimham Committee – I recommendations also faced some challenges and limitations:

Slow Pace of Reforms: The implementation of some reforms, particularly in the banking sector, was slow and faced resistance from vested interests.
Asset Quality Issues: The banking sector continued to face challenges related to asset quality, with high levels of NPAs persisting in some banks.
Lack of Financial Inclusion: While the reforms led to some improvement in financial inclusion, access to financial services remained limited for a large segment of the population, particularly in rural areas.
Regulatory Arbitrage: The deregulation of the financial sector led to some instances of regulatory arbitrage, where institutions exploited loopholes in the regulatory framework.

The Narasimham Committee – II

In 1998, the Indian government appointed another committee under the chairmanship of Dr. M. Narasimham, known as the Narasimham Committee – II. This committee was tasked with reviewing the progress of the financial sector reforms implemented based on the recommendations of the first committee and suggesting further measures to strengthen the financial system.

The Narasimham Committee – II made several recommendations, including:

Strengthening the Regulatory Framework: The committee recommended further strengthening the regulatory framework for the financial sector, including the establishment of a Financial Stability and Development Council (FSDC) to coordinate financial sector regulation.
Improving Asset Quality: The committee emphasized the need to improve asset quality in the banking sector and recommended measures to address NPAs.
Promoting Financial Inclusion: The committee recommended measures to promote financial inclusion, including the expansion of microfinance and the development of financial literacy programs.

Conclusion

The Narasimham Committee – I played a pivotal role in transforming the Indian financial sector. Its recommendations led to a more competitive, efficient, and stable financial system, paving the way for India’s economic growth and development. While the reforms faced some challenges and limitations, they laid the foundation for a modern and dynamic financial sector that continues to evolve and adapt to the changing global landscape.

The Narasimham Committee – I’s legacy continues to shape the Indian financial sector today. Its recommendations serve as a reminder of the importance of timely and comprehensive reforms in addressing the challenges faced by a developing economy. The committee’s work has inspired subsequent reforms and continues to be a valuable resource for policymakers and financial sector professionals in India and beyond.

Frequently Asked Questions on the Narasimham Committee – I

1. What was the primary objective of the Narasimham Committee – I?

The Narasimham Committee – I was formed in 1991 to recommend comprehensive reforms for the Indian financial sector. Its primary objective was to address the inefficiencies, lack of competition, and heavy government control that characterized the sector at the time. The committee aimed to create a more robust, efficient, and dynamic financial system that could support India’s economic growth and development.

2. What were the key recommendations of the Narasimham Committee – I?

The committee made a series of far-reaching recommendations, covering various aspects of the financial sector, including:

Banking Sector Reforms: Deregulation of interest rates, implementation of Basel I capital adequacy norms, establishment of Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs), encouragement of mergers and acquisitions, and strengthening the RBI’s role as a regulator.
Financial Sector Reforms: Development of financial markets, promotion of Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs), and opening up the insurance sector to private players.
Other Recommendations: Fiscal discipline, strengthening the regulatory framework, and promoting financial inclusion.

3. What were the major impacts of the Narasimham Committee – I recommendations?

The implementation of the committee’s recommendations had a profound impact on the Indian financial sector, leading to:

Increased Competition: Deregulation of interest rates and the entry of private sector banks led to greater competition, improving efficiency and customer service.
Enhanced Financial Stability: Basel I capital adequacy norms and ARCs strengthened the financial stability of banks and reduced systemic risk.
Development of Financial Markets: The development of stock exchanges and bond markets provided a platform for raising capital and managing risk.
Growth of NBFCs: The promotion of NBFCs diversified the financial sector and provided alternative sources of credit.
Improved Financial Inclusion: The expansion of the banking sector and development of financial markets brought financial services to a wider segment of the population.

4. What were some of the challenges and limitations faced by the Narasimham Committee – I recommendations?

Despite its significant contributions, the committee’s recommendations faced some challenges and limitations, including:

Slow Pace of Reforms: The implementation of some reforms, particularly in the banking sector, was slow and faced resistance from vested interests.
Asset Quality Issues: The banking sector continued to face challenges related to asset quality, with high levels of NPAs persisting in some banks.
Lack of Financial Inclusion: While the reforms led to some improvement in financial inclusion, access to financial services remained limited for a large segment of the population, particularly in rural areas.
Regulatory Arbitrage: The deregulation of the financial sector led to some instances of regulatory arbitrage, where institutions exploited loopholes in the regulatory framework.

5. What is the significance of the Narasimham Committee – I in the context of Indian financial history?

The Narasimham Committee – I played a pivotal role in transforming the Indian financial sector. Its recommendations laid the foundation for a modern and dynamic financial system that continues to evolve and adapt to the changing global landscape. The committee’s work serves as a reminder of the importance of timely and comprehensive reforms in addressing the challenges faced by a developing economy.

6. What are some of the key takeaways from the Narasimham Committee – I?

The Narasimham Committee – I highlights the importance of:

Deregulation and Competition: Promoting competition in the financial sector can lead to improved efficiency and customer service.
Strong Regulatory Framework: A robust regulatory framework is essential for maintaining financial stability and protecting consumers.
Financial Inclusion: Expanding access to financial services is crucial for economic growth and development.
Continuous Reform: The financial sector needs to be constantly reviewed and reformed to adapt to changing circumstances.

The Narasimham Committee – I’s legacy continues to shape the Indian financial sector today. Its recommendations serve as a valuable resource for policymakers and financial sector professionals in India and beyond.

Here are a few MCQs on the Narasimham Committee – I, with four options each:

1. The Narasimham Committee – I was formed in response to:

a) The economic crisis of 1991
b) The implementation of the Green Revolution
c) The nationalization of banks in 1969
d) The introduction of the Goods and Services Tax (GST)

Answer: a) The economic crisis of 1991

2. The Narasimham Committee – I recommended the deregulation of:

a) Interest rates on deposits and loans
b) Prices of essential commodities
c) Foreign exchange rates
d) Import tariffs

Answer: a) Interest rates on deposits and loans

3. The Basel I capital adequacy norms, implemented based on the committee’s recommendations, aimed to:

a) Increase the lending capacity of banks
b) Strengthen the financial stability of banks
c) Reduce the role of the Reserve Bank of India
d) Promote the growth of Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)

Answer: b) Strengthen the financial stability of banks

4. The Narasimham Committee – I recommended the establishment of:

a) The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)
b) The Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (IRDA)
c) Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs)
d) The National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD)

Answer: c) Asset Reconstruction Companies (ARCs)

5. The implementation of the Narasimham Committee – I recommendations led to:

a) A decline in the number of private sector banks
b) Increased competition in the banking sector
c) A decrease in the use of financial markets
d) A reduction in the role of the Reserve Bank of India

Answer: b) Increased competition in the banking sector

6. Which of the following was NOT a challenge faced by the Narasimham Committee – I recommendations?

a) Slow pace of reforms
b) Asset quality issues in the banking sector
c) Lack of financial inclusion
d) The establishment of the Financial Stability and Development Council (FSDC)

Answer: d) The establishment of the Financial Stability and Development Council (FSDC)

7. The Narasimham Committee – I’s recommendations were primarily focused on:

a) Promoting agricultural development
b) Strengthening the financial sector
c) Reducing poverty
d) Increasing government spending

Answer: b) Strengthening the financial sector

8. The Narasimham Committee – I was chaired by:

a) Dr. Manmohan Singh
b) Dr. C. Rangarajan
c) Dr. M. Narasimham
d) Dr. Y.V. Reddy

Answer: c) Dr. M. Narasimham

9. The Narasimham Committee – I’s recommendations were implemented through:

a) A series of legislative and regulatory measures
b) A single comprehensive act
c) A constitutional amendment
d) A presidential decree

Answer: a) A series of legislative and regulatory measures

10. The Narasimham Committee – I’s legacy is considered to be:

a) A failure due to its limited impact
b) A success due to its significant contributions to the Indian financial sector
c) A mixed bag with both positive and negative outcomes
d) A controversial topic with no clear consensus on its impact

Answer: b) A success due to its significant contributions to the Indian financial sector