{"id":93940,"date":"2025-06-01T12:00:30","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T12:00:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=93940"},"modified":"2025-06-01T12:00:30","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T12:00:30","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following statements is correct ?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following statements is correct ?<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Directive Principles of State Policy are not justiciable.&#8221; option2=&#8221;Legislations included in Ninth Schedule are not justiciable.&#8221; option3=&#8221;Laws enacted under Article 323-A are not justiciable.&#8221; option4=&#8221;Ordinances promulgated by the President of India are not justiciable.&#8221; correct=&#8221;option1&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC SO-Steno &#8211; 2017<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-so-steno-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-so-steno-2017\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nStatement A is correct. Article 37 of the Constitution, which is part of Part IV containing the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs), clearly states, &#8220;The provisions contained in this Part shall not be enforceable by any court&#8221;. This means DPSPs are non-justiciable, i.e., they cannot be enforced through legal action in courts.<br \/>\nStatement B is incorrect. While laws placed in the Ninth Schedule were initially considered immune from judicial review, the Supreme Court in the I.R. Coelho case (2007) ruled that laws placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973 (the date of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment) are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution.<br \/>\nStatement C is incorrect. Laws enacted under Article 323-A (Administrative Tribunals) establish tribunals whose decisions are subject to judicial review by High Courts (under Articles 226\/227) and the Supreme Court (under Article 136), as established in the L. Chandra Kumar case (1997).<br \/>\nStatement D is incorrect. Ordinances promulgated by the President under Article 123 or Governors under Article 213 are laws and are subject to judicial review on grounds such as lack of legislative competence, violation of fundamental rights, or malafide intent (as established in cases like D.C. Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar).<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\nDirective Principles of State Policy are explicitly made non-justiciable by Article 37 of the Constitution.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional_information\">\nJusticiability refers to the ability to enforce rights or principles through court action. While DPSPs are non-justiciable, they are fundamental in the governance of the country and are expected to guide the State in making laws.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following statements is correct ? [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Directive Principles of State Policy are not justiciable.&#8221; option2=&#8221;Legislations included in Ninth Schedule are not justiciable.&#8221; option3=&#8221;Laws enacted under Article 323-A are not justiciable.&#8221; option4=&#8221;Ordinances promulgated by the President of India are not justiciable.&#8221; correct=&#8221;option1&#8243;] This question was previously asked in UPSC SO-Steno &#8211; 2017 &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Which one of the following statements is correct ?\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/#more-93940\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Which one of the following statements is correct ?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1095],"tags":[1101,1099,1172],"class_list":["post-93940","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-so-steno","tag-1101","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-the-governance-system","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Which one of the following statements is correct ?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Statement A is correct. Article 37 of the Constitution, which is part of Part IV containing the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs), clearly states, &quot;The provisions contained in this Part shall not be enforceable by any court&quot;. This means DPSPs are non-justiciable, i.e., they cannot be enforced through legal action in courts. Statement B is incorrect. While laws placed in the Ninth Schedule were initially considered immune from judicial review, the Supreme Court in the I.R. Coelho case (2007) ruled that laws placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973 (the date of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment) are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution. Statement C is incorrect. Laws enacted under Article 323-A (Administrative Tribunals) establish tribunals whose decisions are subject to judicial review by High Courts (under Articles 226\/227) and the Supreme Court (under Article 136), as established in the L. Chandra Kumar case (1997). Statement D is incorrect. Ordinances promulgated by the President under Article 123 or Governors under Article 213 are laws and are subject to judicial review on grounds such as lack of legislative competence, violation of fundamental rights, or malafide intent (as established in cases like D.C. Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar). Directive Principles of State Policy are explicitly made non-justiciable by Article 37 of the Constitution.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following statements is correct ?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Statement A is correct. Article 37 of the Constitution, which is part of Part IV containing the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs), clearly states, &quot;The provisions contained in this Part shall not be enforceable by any court&quot;. This means DPSPs are non-justiciable, i.e., they cannot be enforced through legal action in courts. Statement B is incorrect. While laws placed in the Ninth Schedule were initially considered immune from judicial review, the Supreme Court in the I.R. Coelho case (2007) ruled that laws placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973 (the date of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment) are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution. Statement C is incorrect. Laws enacted under Article 323-A (Administrative Tribunals) establish tribunals whose decisions are subject to judicial review by High Courts (under Articles 226\/227) and the Supreme Court (under Article 136), as established in the L. Chandra Kumar case (1997). Statement D is incorrect. Ordinances promulgated by the President under Article 123 or Governors under Article 213 are laws and are subject to judicial review on grounds such as lack of legislative competence, violation of fundamental rights, or malafide intent (as established in cases like D.C. Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar). Directive Principles of State Policy are explicitly made non-justiciable by Article 37 of the Constitution.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T12:00:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following statements is correct ?","description":"Statement A is correct. Article 37 of the Constitution, which is part of Part IV containing the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs), clearly states, \"The provisions contained in this Part shall not be enforceable by any court\". This means DPSPs are non-justiciable, i.e., they cannot be enforced through legal action in courts. Statement B is incorrect. While laws placed in the Ninth Schedule were initially considered immune from judicial review, the Supreme Court in the I.R. Coelho case (2007) ruled that laws placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973 (the date of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment) are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution. Statement C is incorrect. Laws enacted under Article 323-A (Administrative Tribunals) establish tribunals whose decisions are subject to judicial review by High Courts (under Articles 226\/227) and the Supreme Court (under Article 136), as established in the L. Chandra Kumar case (1997). Statement D is incorrect. Ordinances promulgated by the President under Article 123 or Governors under Article 213 are laws and are subject to judicial review on grounds such as lack of legislative competence, violation of fundamental rights, or malafide intent (as established in cases like D.C. Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar). Directive Principles of State Policy are explicitly made non-justiciable by Article 37 of the Constitution.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following statements is correct ?","og_description":"Statement A is correct. Article 37 of the Constitution, which is part of Part IV containing the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs), clearly states, \"The provisions contained in this Part shall not be enforceable by any court\". This means DPSPs are non-justiciable, i.e., they cannot be enforced through legal action in courts. Statement B is incorrect. While laws placed in the Ninth Schedule were initially considered immune from judicial review, the Supreme Court in the I.R. Coelho case (2007) ruled that laws placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973 (the date of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment) are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution. Statement C is incorrect. Laws enacted under Article 323-A (Administrative Tribunals) establish tribunals whose decisions are subject to judicial review by High Courts (under Articles 226\/227) and the Supreme Court (under Article 136), as established in the L. Chandra Kumar case (1997). Statement D is incorrect. Ordinances promulgated by the President under Article 123 or Governors under Article 213 are laws and are subject to judicial review on grounds such as lack of legislative competence, violation of fundamental rights, or malafide intent (as established in cases like D.C. Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar). Directive Principles of State Policy are explicitly made non-justiciable by Article 37 of the Constitution.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T12:00:30+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/","name":"Which one of the following statements is correct ?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T12:00:30+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T12:00:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Statement A is correct. Article 37 of the Constitution, which is part of Part IV containing the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSPs), clearly states, \"The provisions contained in this Part shall not be enforceable by any court\". This means DPSPs are non-justiciable, i.e., they cannot be enforced through legal action in courts. Statement B is incorrect. While laws placed in the Ninth Schedule were initially considered immune from judicial review, the Supreme Court in the I.R. Coelho case (2007) ruled that laws placed in the Ninth Schedule after April 24, 1973 (the date of the Kesavananda Bharati judgment) are subject to judicial review if they violate the basic structure of the Constitution. Statement C is incorrect. Laws enacted under Article 323-A (Administrative Tribunals) establish tribunals whose decisions are subject to judicial review by High Courts (under Articles 226\/227) and the Supreme Court (under Article 136), as established in the L. Chandra Kumar case (1997). Statement D is incorrect. Ordinances promulgated by the President under Article 123 or Governors under Article 213 are laws and are subject to judicial review on grounds such as lack of legislative competence, violation of fundamental rights, or malafide intent (as established in cases like D.C. Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar). Directive Principles of State Policy are explicitly made non-justiciable by Article 37 of the Constitution.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-correct-53\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC SO-Steno","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-so-steno\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following statements is correct ?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93940"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93940\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}