{"id":93884,"date":"2025-06-01T11:59:06","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:59:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=93884"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:59:06","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:59:06","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following statements is not correct?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Which one of the following statements is not correct?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”Before 1923, a Bill passed by one House and transmitted to the other House of the Central Legislative Assembly did not lapse upon dissolution of the House which had passed it.” option2=”Bills passed by Lok Sabha but pending in Rajya Sabha on the date of dissolution of Lok Sabha, lapse.” option3=”Only Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, lapse.” option4=”Only Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, do not lapse.” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC SO-Steno – 2017<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nStatement A is likely correct as a historical point regarding the Central Legislative Assembly before 1923. Rules regarding lapse upon dissolution have changed over time.
\nStatement B is correct. This is explicitly stated in Article 107(5) of the Constitution: a Bill which has passed by the Lok Sabha and is pending in the Rajya Sabha, shall lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha.
\nStatement C is incorrect. The statement claims that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *lapse*. This is false. According to Article 107(4), a Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha shall *not* lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Such Bills originating in RS and pending in RS do *not* lapse. Furthermore, the word “Only” is incorrect, as other types of bills also lapse (e.g., bills pending in LS, bills passed by LS but pending in RS).
\nStatement D is correct. It states that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *do not lapse*. While the word “Only” is incorrect as other bills also do not lapse (passed by both houses, pending assent\/reconsideration), the core assertion that Bills originating and pending in Rajya Sabha (and not transmitted to LS) do not lapse is correct (Article 107(4)). However, compared to C, C’s core assertion that these bills *lapse* is fundamentally false, making C the “not correct” statement.
\n<\/section>\n
\nBills originating in the Rajya Sabha and pending there (not having been sent to Lok Sabha) do not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C incorrectly claims that this category of bills *lapses*.
\n<\/section>\n
\nThe rules regarding lapse of Bills upon dissolution of the Lok Sabha are crucial aspects of parliamentary procedure governed by Article 107 of the Constitution. Understanding which Bills lapse and which do not is essential.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Which one of the following statements is not correct? [amp_mcq option1=”Before 1923, a Bill passed by one House and transmitted to the other House of the Central Legislative Assembly did not lapse upon dissolution of the House which had passed it.” option2=”Bills passed by Lok Sabha but pending in Rajya Sabha on the date of … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionWhich one of the following statements is not correct?<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1095],"tags":[1101,1099,1111],"class_list":["post-93884","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-so-steno","tag-1101","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-the-parliament","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nWhich one of the following statements is not correct?<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Statement A is likely correct as a historical point regarding the Central Legislative Assembly before 1923. Rules regarding lapse upon dissolution have changed over time. Statement B is correct. This is explicitly stated in Article 107(5) of the Constitution: a Bill which has passed by the Lok Sabha and is pending in the Rajya Sabha, shall lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C is incorrect. The statement claims that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *lapse*. This is false. According to Article 107(4), a Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha shall *not* lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Such Bills originating in RS and pending in RS do *not* lapse. Furthermore, the word "Only" is incorrect, as other types of bills also lapse (e.g., bills pending in LS, bills passed by LS but pending in RS). Statement D is correct. It states that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *do not lapse*. While the word "Only" is incorrect as other bills also do not lapse (passed by both houses, pending assent\/reconsideration), the core assertion that Bills originating and pending in Rajya Sabha (and not transmitted to LS) do not lapse is correct (Article 107(4)). However, compared to C, C's core assertion that these bills *lapse* is fundamentally false, making C the "not correct" statement. Bills originating in the Rajya Sabha and pending there (not having been sent to Lok Sabha) do not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C incorrectly claims that this category of bills *lapses*.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following statements is not correct?\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Statement A is likely correct as a historical point regarding the Central Legislative Assembly before 1923. Rules regarding lapse upon dissolution have changed over time. Statement B is correct. This is explicitly stated in Article 107(5) of the Constitution: a Bill which has passed by the Lok Sabha and is pending in the Rajya Sabha, shall lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C is incorrect. The statement claims that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *lapse*. This is false. According to Article 107(4), a Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha shall *not* lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Such Bills originating in RS and pending in RS do *not* lapse. Furthermore, the word "Only" is incorrect, as other types of bills also lapse (e.g., bills pending in LS, bills passed by LS but pending in RS). Statement D is correct. It states that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *do not lapse*. While the word "Only" is incorrect as other bills also do not lapse (passed by both houses, pending assent\/reconsideration), the core assertion that Bills originating and pending in Rajya Sabha (and not transmitted to LS) do not lapse is correct (Article 107(4)). However, compared to C, C's core assertion that these bills *lapse* is fundamentally false, making C the "not correct" statement. Bills originating in the Rajya Sabha and pending there (not having been sent to Lok Sabha) do not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C incorrectly claims that this category of bills *lapses*.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:59:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following statements is not correct?","description":"Statement A is likely correct as a historical point regarding the Central Legislative Assembly before 1923. Rules regarding lapse upon dissolution have changed over time. Statement B is correct. This is explicitly stated in Article 107(5) of the Constitution: a Bill which has passed by the Lok Sabha and is pending in the Rajya Sabha, shall lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C is incorrect. The statement claims that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *lapse*. This is false. According to Article 107(4), a Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha shall *not* lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Such Bills originating in RS and pending in RS do *not* lapse. Furthermore, the word \"Only\" is incorrect, as other types of bills also lapse (e.g., bills pending in LS, bills passed by LS but pending in RS). Statement D is correct. It states that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *do not lapse*. While the word \"Only\" is incorrect as other bills also do not lapse (passed by both houses, pending assent\/reconsideration), the core assertion that Bills originating and pending in Rajya Sabha (and not transmitted to LS) do not lapse is correct (Article 107(4)). However, compared to C, C's core assertion that these bills *lapse* is fundamentally false, making C the \"not correct\" statement. Bills originating in the Rajya Sabha and pending there (not having been sent to Lok Sabha) do not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C incorrectly claims that this category of bills *lapses*.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following statements is not correct?","og_description":"Statement A is likely correct as a historical point regarding the Central Legislative Assembly before 1923. Rules regarding lapse upon dissolution have changed over time. Statement B is correct. This is explicitly stated in Article 107(5) of the Constitution: a Bill which has passed by the Lok Sabha and is pending in the Rajya Sabha, shall lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C is incorrect. The statement claims that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *lapse*. This is false. According to Article 107(4), a Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha shall *not* lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Such Bills originating in RS and pending in RS do *not* lapse. Furthermore, the word \"Only\" is incorrect, as other types of bills also lapse (e.g., bills pending in LS, bills passed by LS but pending in RS). Statement D is correct. It states that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *do not lapse*. While the word \"Only\" is incorrect as other bills also do not lapse (passed by both houses, pending assent\/reconsideration), the core assertion that Bills originating and pending in Rajya Sabha (and not transmitted to LS) do not lapse is correct (Article 107(4)). However, compared to C, C's core assertion that these bills *lapse* is fundamentally false, making C the \"not correct\" statement. Bills originating in the Rajya Sabha and pending there (not having been sent to Lok Sabha) do not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C incorrectly claims that this category of bills *lapses*.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:59:06+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64\/","name":"Which one of the following statements is not correct?","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:59:06+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:59:06+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Statement A is likely correct as a historical point regarding the Central Legislative Assembly before 1923. Rules regarding lapse upon dissolution have changed over time. Statement B is correct. This is explicitly stated in Article 107(5) of the Constitution: a Bill which has passed by the Lok Sabha and is pending in the Rajya Sabha, shall lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C is incorrect. The statement claims that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *lapse*. This is false. According to Article 107(4), a Bill pending in the Rajya Sabha which has not been passed by the Lok Sabha shall *not* lapse on a dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Such Bills originating in RS and pending in RS do *not* lapse. Furthermore, the word \"Only\" is incorrect, as other types of bills also lapse (e.g., bills pending in LS, bills passed by LS but pending in RS). Statement D is correct. It states that *only* Bills originating in Rajya Sabha which have not been passed by Lok Sabha but are still pending before Rajya Sabha, *do not lapse*. While the word \"Only\" is incorrect as other bills also do not lapse (passed by both houses, pending assent\/reconsideration), the core assertion that Bills originating and pending in Rajya Sabha (and not transmitted to LS) do not lapse is correct (Article 107(4)). However, compared to C, C's core assertion that these bills *lapse* is fundamentally false, making C the \"not correct\" statement. Bills originating in the Rajya Sabha and pending there (not having been sent to Lok Sabha) do not lapse upon the dissolution of the Lok Sabha. Statement C incorrectly claims that this category of bills *lapses*.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-64\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC SO-Steno","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-so-steno\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following statements is not correct?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93884"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93884\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93884"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}