{"id":93604,"date":"2025-06-01T11:53:31","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:53:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=93604"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:53:31","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:53:31","slug":"the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol\/","title":{"rendered":"The jurisdiction of the courts has been ousted in which one of the fol"},"content":{"rendered":"

The jurisdiction of the courts has been ousted in which one of the following matters?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”Any law dealing with delimitation of constituencies with regard to election to municipalities” option2=”Reservations made for various categories for elections in municipalities” option3=”Disqualification for membership of a Panchayat” option4=”Election of members of the board in a cooperative society” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC Combined Section Officer – 2019-20<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nArticle 243ZG of the Constitution, relating to Municipalities, explicitly bars interference by courts in electoral matters, stating that the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies cannot be called into question in any court. This represents a specific ouster of court jurisdiction.
\n<\/section>\n
\n– Article 243ZG(a) constitutionally ousts the jurisdiction of courts regarding the validity of laws related to the delimitation of constituencies and allotment of seats for municipalities.
\n– While election disputes can be raised through an election petition to a designated authority (as per 243ZG(b)), challenging the delimitation law itself in court is barred.
\n– Reservations (B) as a concept might be challenged on constitutional grounds, but the allotment of seats based on delimitation and reservation is covered by the ouster in 243ZG(a).
\n– Disqualification for Panchayat membership (C) is dealt with by state law and election petitions, with court intervention limited but not a complete constitutional ouster of the law itself like delimitation.
\n– Disputes in cooperative societies (D) are governed by state law, often through tribunals or registrars, with limited but not fully ousted court jurisdiction, and it’s not a constitutional ouster.
\n<\/section>\n
\nSimilar provisions barring court interference in electoral matters for Panchayats exist in Article 243O of the Constitution. These articles aim to prevent delays and disruptions in local body elections by channeling specific disputes to designated authorities and barring challenges to the fundamental processes of delimitation and seat allotment in courts.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The jurisdiction of the courts has been ousted in which one of the following matters? [amp_mcq option1=”Any law dealing with delimitation of constituencies with regard to election to municipalities” option2=”Reservations made for various categories for elections in municipalities” option3=”Disqualification for membership of a Panchayat” option4=”Election of members of the board in a cooperative society” correct=”option1″] … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionThe jurisdiction of the courts has been ousted in which one of the fol<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1090],"tags":[1483,1099,1230],"class_list":["post-93604","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-combined-section-officer","tag-2019-20","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-panchayati-raj-and-community-development","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nThe jurisdiction of the courts has been ousted in which one of the fol<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Article 243ZG of the Constitution, relating to Municipalities, explicitly bars interference by courts in electoral matters, stating that the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies cannot be called into question in any court. This represents a specific ouster of court jurisdiction. - Article 243ZG(a) constitutionally ousts the jurisdiction of courts regarding the validity of laws related to the delimitation of constituencies and allotment of seats for municipalities. - While election disputes can be raised through an election petition to a designated authority (as per 243ZG(b)), challenging the delimitation law itself in court is barred. - Reservations (B) as a concept might be challenged on constitutional grounds, but the allotment of seats based on delimitation and reservation is covered by the ouster in 243ZG(a). - Disqualification for Panchayat membership (C) is dealt with by state law and election petitions, with court intervention limited but not a complete constitutional ouster of the law itself like delimitation. - Disputes in cooperative societies (D) are governed by state law, often through tribunals or registrars, with limited but not fully ousted court jurisdiction, and it's not a constitutional ouster.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The jurisdiction of the courts has been ousted in which one of the fol\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Article 243ZG of the Constitution, relating to Municipalities, explicitly bars interference by courts in electoral matters, stating that the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies cannot be called into question in any court. This represents a specific ouster of court jurisdiction. - Article 243ZG(a) constitutionally ousts the jurisdiction of courts regarding the validity of laws related to the delimitation of constituencies and allotment of seats for municipalities. - While election disputes can be raised through an election petition to a designated authority (as per 243ZG(b)), challenging the delimitation law itself in court is barred. - Reservations (B) as a concept might be challenged on constitutional grounds, but the allotment of seats based on delimitation and reservation is covered by the ouster in 243ZG(a). - Disqualification for Panchayat membership (C) is dealt with by state law and election petitions, with court intervention limited but not a complete constitutional ouster of the law itself like delimitation. - Disputes in cooperative societies (D) are governed by state law, often through tribunals or registrars, with limited but not fully ousted court jurisdiction, and it's not a constitutional ouster.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:53:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The jurisdiction of the courts has been ousted in which one of the fol","description":"Article 243ZG of the Constitution, relating to Municipalities, explicitly bars interference by courts in electoral matters, stating that the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies cannot be called into question in any court. This represents a specific ouster of court jurisdiction. - Article 243ZG(a) constitutionally ousts the jurisdiction of courts regarding the validity of laws related to the delimitation of constituencies and allotment of seats for municipalities. - While election disputes can be raised through an election petition to a designated authority (as per 243ZG(b)), challenging the delimitation law itself in court is barred. - Reservations (B) as a concept might be challenged on constitutional grounds, but the allotment of seats based on delimitation and reservation is covered by the ouster in 243ZG(a). - Disqualification for Panchayat membership (C) is dealt with by state law and election petitions, with court intervention limited but not a complete constitutional ouster of the law itself like delimitation. - Disputes in cooperative societies (D) are governed by state law, often through tribunals or registrars, with limited but not fully ousted court jurisdiction, and it's not a constitutional ouster.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The jurisdiction of the courts has been ousted in which one of the fol","og_description":"Article 243ZG of the Constitution, relating to Municipalities, explicitly bars interference by courts in electoral matters, stating that the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies cannot be called into question in any court. This represents a specific ouster of court jurisdiction. - Article 243ZG(a) constitutionally ousts the jurisdiction of courts regarding the validity of laws related to the delimitation of constituencies and allotment of seats for municipalities. - While election disputes can be raised through an election petition to a designated authority (as per 243ZG(b)), challenging the delimitation law itself in court is barred. - Reservations (B) as a concept might be challenged on constitutional grounds, but the allotment of seats based on delimitation and reservation is covered by the ouster in 243ZG(a). - Disqualification for Panchayat membership (C) is dealt with by state law and election petitions, with court intervention limited but not a complete constitutional ouster of the law itself like delimitation. - Disputes in cooperative societies (D) are governed by state law, often through tribunals or registrars, with limited but not fully ousted court jurisdiction, and it's not a constitutional ouster.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:53:31+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol\/","name":"The jurisdiction of the courts has been ousted in which one of the fol","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:53:31+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:53:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Article 243ZG of the Constitution, relating to Municipalities, explicitly bars interference by courts in electoral matters, stating that the validity of any law relating to the delimitation of constituencies or the allotment of seats to such constituencies cannot be called into question in any court. This represents a specific ouster of court jurisdiction. - Article 243ZG(a) constitutionally ousts the jurisdiction of courts regarding the validity of laws related to the delimitation of constituencies and allotment of seats for municipalities. - While election disputes can be raised through an election petition to a designated authority (as per 243ZG(b)), challenging the delimitation law itself in court is barred. - Reservations (B) as a concept might be challenged on constitutional grounds, but the allotment of seats based on delimitation and reservation is covered by the ouster in 243ZG(a). - Disqualification for Panchayat membership (C) is dealt with by state law and election petitions, with court intervention limited but not a complete constitutional ouster of the law itself like delimitation. - Disputes in cooperative societies (D) are governed by state law, often through tribunals or registrars, with limited but not fully ousted court jurisdiction, and it's not a constitutional ouster.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-jurisdiction-of-the-courts-has-been-ousted-in-which-one-of-the-fol\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC Combined Section Officer","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-combined-section-officer\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The jurisdiction of the courts has been ousted in which one of the fol"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93604","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93604"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93604\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93604"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93604"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93604"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}