Consider the following statements and conclusions:<\/p>\n
Conclusion I : Some P are R.
\nConclusion II : Every R is P.
\nWhich of the above conclusions can be certainly drawn?<\/p>\n
[amp_mcq option1=”Conclusion I only” option2=”Conclusion II only” option3=”Both conclusions I and II” option4=”Neither conclusion I nor II” correct=”option4″]<\/p>\n
Consider a scenario where the set P overlaps with Q, but the overlap region is entirely outside R. In this case, “Some P are Q” and “Every R is Q” hold true, but “Some P are R” is false, and “Every R is P” is false.
\nSince there exists a valid interpretation of the statements where both conclusions are false, neither conclusion can be certainly drawn from the given statements.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Consider the following statements and conclusions: Statement I : Some P are Q. Statement II : Every R is Q. Conclusion I : Some P are R. Conclusion II : Every R is P. Which of the above conclusions can be certainly drawn? [amp_mcq option1=”Conclusion I only” option2=”Conclusion II only” option3=”Both conclusions I and II” … <\/p>\n