{"id":93354,"date":"2025-06-01T11:48:59","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:48:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=93354"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:48:59","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:48:59","slug":"in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi\/","title":{"rendered":"In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directi"},"content":{"rendered":"

In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directions that statutory status should be conferred upon the Central Vigilance Commission ?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”Vineet Narain & Others v. Union of India & Another” option2=”Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India” option3=”Centre for PIL v. Union of India & Others” option4=”Pravin Kumar v. The State” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2023<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
The correct option is A, which refers to the case of Vineet Narain & Others v. Union of India & Another.<\/section>\n
In the landmark Vineet Narain case (1997), the Supreme Court of India issued significant guidelines regarding the functioning of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). Concerned about the integrity and independence of investigative agencies in prosecuting corruption cases involving high-profile individuals, the Court directed that the CVC be given a statutory status to ensure its independence and effectiveness in supervising anti-corruption efforts.<\/section>\n
Following the directions in the Vineet Narain judgment, the Central Vigilance Commission Act was enacted in 2003, conferring statutory status upon the CVC and defining its powers and functions. This was a crucial step towards strengthening institutional mechanisms against corruption in India.<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directions that statutory status should be conferred upon the Central Vigilance Commission ? [amp_mcq option1=”Vineet Narain & Others v. Union of India & Another” option2=”Common Cause (A Regd. Society) v. Union of India” option3=”Centre for PIL v. Union of India & Others” option4=”Pravin … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionIn which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directi<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1089],"tags":[1105,1099,1180],"class_list":["post-93354","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cisf-ac-exe","tag-1105","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-the-supreme-court","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nIn which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directi<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The correct option is A, which refers to the case of Vineet Narain & Others v. Union of India & Another. In the landmark Vineet Narain case (1997), the Supreme Court of India issued significant guidelines regarding the functioning of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). Concerned about the integrity and independence of investigative agencies in prosecuting corruption cases involving high-profile individuals, the Court directed that the CVC be given a statutory status to ensure its independence and effectiveness in supervising anti-corruption efforts.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directi\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The correct option is A, which refers to the case of Vineet Narain & Others v. Union of India & Another. In the landmark Vineet Narain case (1997), the Supreme Court of India issued significant guidelines regarding the functioning of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). Concerned about the integrity and independence of investigative agencies in prosecuting corruption cases involving high-profile individuals, the Court directed that the CVC be given a statutory status to ensure its independence and effectiveness in supervising anti-corruption efforts.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:48:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directi","description":"The correct option is A, which refers to the case of Vineet Narain & Others v. Union of India & Another. In the landmark Vineet Narain case (1997), the Supreme Court of India issued significant guidelines regarding the functioning of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). Concerned about the integrity and independence of investigative agencies in prosecuting corruption cases involving high-profile individuals, the Court directed that the CVC be given a statutory status to ensure its independence and effectiveness in supervising anti-corruption efforts.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directi","og_description":"The correct option is A, which refers to the case of Vineet Narain & Others v. Union of India & Another. In the landmark Vineet Narain case (1997), the Supreme Court of India issued significant guidelines regarding the functioning of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). Concerned about the integrity and independence of investigative agencies in prosecuting corruption cases involving high-profile individuals, the Court directed that the CVC be given a statutory status to ensure its independence and effectiveness in supervising anti-corruption efforts.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:48:59+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi\/","name":"In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directi","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:48:59+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:48:59+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The correct option is A, which refers to the case of Vineet Narain & Others v. Union of India & Another. In the landmark Vineet Narain case (1997), the Supreme Court of India issued significant guidelines regarding the functioning of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Central Vigilance Commission (CVC). Concerned about the integrity and independence of investigative agencies in prosecuting corruption cases involving high-profile individuals, the Court directed that the CVC be given a statutory status to ensure its independence and effectiveness in supervising anti-corruption efforts.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-which-one-of-the-following-cases-did-the-supreme-court-give-directi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CISF-AC-EXE","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cisf-ac-exe\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"In which one of the following cases did the Supreme Court give directi"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93354","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93354"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93354\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93354"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93354"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93354"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}