{"id":93199,"date":"2025-06-01T11:43:54","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:43:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=93199"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:43:54","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:43:54","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following statements with respect to number of witnes"},"content":{"rendered":"

Which one of the following statements with respect to number of witnesses is not correct ?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”No particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact.” option2=”It is the quality of the evidence and not the quantity of the evidence which is required to be judged by the court.” option3=”It is held in many judgments that reliance cannot be based on the solitary statement of a witness in any situation.” option4=”The legal system has laid emphasis on value provided by each witness, rather than multiplicity or plurality of witness.” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2022<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe statement that is not correct is “It is held in many judgments that reliance cannot be based on the solitary statement of a witness in any situation.”
\n<\/section>\n
\nSection 134 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 expressly states, “No particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact.” This statutory provision establishes the principle that evidence is weighed, not counted. The court can base its decision on the testimony of a single witness if it finds that witness to be credible and reliable. Statements A, B, and D all reflect this principle \u2013 that the law does not require a minimum number of witnesses and emphasizes the quality or value of the evidence over the quantity. Statement C directly contradicts this principle by claiming that reliance cannot be based on a solitary statement in *any* situation, which is incorrect under Indian law.
\n<\/section>\n
\nWhile courts often prefer corroboration, especially in certain types of cases, the evidence of a single credible witness is sufficient to establish a fact. There is no rule of law requiring multiple witnesses for proof; it is a matter for the court to decide based on its assessment of the reliability of the witness’s testimony.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Which one of the following statements with respect to number of witnesses is not correct ? [amp_mcq option1=”No particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact.” option2=”It is the quality of the evidence and not the quantity of the evidence which is required to be judged by … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionWhich one of the following statements with respect to number of witnes<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1089],"tags":[1108,1099,1115],"class_list":["post-93199","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cisf-ac-exe","tag-1108","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-miscellaneous","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nWhich one of the following statements with respect to number of witnes<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The statement that is not correct is "It is held in many judgments that reliance cannot be based on the solitary statement of a witness in any situation." Section 134 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 expressly states, "No particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact." This statutory provision establishes the principle that evidence is weighed, not counted. The court can base its decision on the testimony of a single witness if it finds that witness to be credible and reliable. Statements A, B, and D all reflect this principle \u2013 that the law does not require a minimum number of witnesses and emphasizes the quality or value of the evidence over the quantity. Statement C directly contradicts this principle by claiming that reliance cannot be based on a solitary statement in *any* situation, which is incorrect under Indian law.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following statements with respect to number of witnes\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The statement that is not correct is "It is held in many judgments that reliance cannot be based on the solitary statement of a witness in any situation." Section 134 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 expressly states, "No particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact." This statutory provision establishes the principle that evidence is weighed, not counted. The court can base its decision on the testimony of a single witness if it finds that witness to be credible and reliable. Statements A, B, and D all reflect this principle \u2013 that the law does not require a minimum number of witnesses and emphasizes the quality or value of the evidence over the quantity. Statement C directly contradicts this principle by claiming that reliance cannot be based on a solitary statement in *any* situation, which is incorrect under Indian law.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:43:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following statements with respect to number of witnes","description":"The statement that is not correct is \"It is held in many judgments that reliance cannot be based on the solitary statement of a witness in any situation.\" Section 134 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 expressly states, \"No particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact.\" This statutory provision establishes the principle that evidence is weighed, not counted. The court can base its decision on the testimony of a single witness if it finds that witness to be credible and reliable. Statements A, B, and D all reflect this principle \u2013 that the law does not require a minimum number of witnesses and emphasizes the quality or value of the evidence over the quantity. Statement C directly contradicts this principle by claiming that reliance cannot be based on a solitary statement in *any* situation, which is incorrect under Indian law.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following statements with respect to number of witnes","og_description":"The statement that is not correct is \"It is held in many judgments that reliance cannot be based on the solitary statement of a witness in any situation.\" Section 134 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 expressly states, \"No particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact.\" This statutory provision establishes the principle that evidence is weighed, not counted. The court can base its decision on the testimony of a single witness if it finds that witness to be credible and reliable. Statements A, B, and D all reflect this principle \u2013 that the law does not require a minimum number of witnesses and emphasizes the quality or value of the evidence over the quantity. Statement C directly contradicts this principle by claiming that reliance cannot be based on a solitary statement in *any* situation, which is incorrect under Indian law.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:43:54+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes\/","name":"Which one of the following statements with respect to number of witnes","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:43:54+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:43:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The statement that is not correct is \"It is held in many judgments that reliance cannot be based on the solitary statement of a witness in any situation.\" Section 134 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 expressly states, \"No particular number of witnesses shall in any case be required for the proof of any fact.\" This statutory provision establishes the principle that evidence is weighed, not counted. The court can base its decision on the testimony of a single witness if it finds that witness to be credible and reliable. Statements A, B, and D all reflect this principle \u2013 that the law does not require a minimum number of witnesses and emphasizes the quality or value of the evidence over the quantity. Statement C directly contradicts this principle by claiming that reliance cannot be based on a solitary statement in *any* situation, which is incorrect under Indian law.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-number-of-witnes\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CISF-AC-EXE","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cisf-ac-exe\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following statements with respect to number of witnes"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93199","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93199"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93199\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93199"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93199"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93199"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}