{"id":92755,"date":"2025-06-01T11:31:58","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:31:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=92755"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:31:58","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:31:58","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Eviden"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is not correct?<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;An accomplice cannot be a witness.&#8221; option2=&#8221;Communication between lawyer and client is privileged, hence cannot be admitted as evidence.&#8221; option3=&#8221;Competency of witness shall be decided by Court.&#8221; option4=&#8221;A dumb witness may give his\/her witness only in writing which may amount to oral witness.&#8221; correct=&#8221;option1&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC CISF-AC-EXE &#8211; 2019<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-cisf-ac-exe-2019.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-cisf-ac-exe-2019\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nThe correct option is A) An accomplice cannot be a witness.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\nSection 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 states that &#8220;An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.&#8221; Therefore, an accomplice *can* be a witness.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nWhile Section 133 states that an accomplice is a competent witness, Section 114, Illustration (b) suggests that the court may presume that an accomplice is unworthy of credit unless his evidence is corroborated in material particulars. This highlights that while their evidence is admissible, courts typically treat it with caution and seek corroboration, but they are nonetheless competent to testify. Options B, C, and D correctly reflect provisions of the Indian Evidence Act regarding privileged communications (Sections 126-129), competency of witnesses (Section 118), and evidence by dumb witnesses (Section 119), respectively.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is not correct? [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;An accomplice cannot be a witness.&#8221; option2=&#8221;Communication between lawyer and client is privileged, hence cannot be admitted as evidence.&#8221; option3=&#8221;Competency of witness shall be decided by Court.&#8221; option4=&#8221;A dumb witness may give his\/her witness only in writing which &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Eviden\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/#more-92755\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Eviden<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1089],"tags":[1119,1099,1115],"class_list":["post-92755","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cisf-ac-exe","tag-1119","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-miscellaneous","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Eviden<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The correct option is A) An accomplice cannot be a witness. Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 states that &quot;An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.&quot; Therefore, an accomplice *can* be a witness.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Eviden\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The correct option is A) An accomplice cannot be a witness. Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 states that &quot;An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.&quot; Therefore, an accomplice *can* be a witness.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:31:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Eviden","description":"The correct option is A) An accomplice cannot be a witness. Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 states that \"An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.\" Therefore, an accomplice *can* be a witness.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Eviden","og_description":"The correct option is A) An accomplice cannot be a witness. Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 states that \"An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.\" Therefore, an accomplice *can* be a witness.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:31:58+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/","name":"Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Eviden","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:31:58+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:31:58+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The correct option is A) An accomplice cannot be a witness. Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 states that \"An accomplice shall be a competent witness against an accused person; and a conviction is not illegal merely because it proceeds upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.\" Therefore, an accomplice *can* be a witness.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-regarding-witnesses-under-the-indian-eviden\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CISF-AC-EXE","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cisf-ac-exe\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following regarding witnesses under the Indian Eviden"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92755","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92755"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92755\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92755"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92755"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92755"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}