{"id":92740,"date":"2025-06-01T11:31:41","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:31:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=92740"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:31:41","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:31:41","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is correct?<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Confession made to a police officer under Section 25 is admissible.&#8221; option2=&#8221;Confession obtained by threat or inducement by a police officer is admissible.&#8221; option3=&#8221;Involuntary confession is admissible.&#8221; option4=&#8221;Confession under Section 27 is admissible.&#8221; correct=&#8221;option4&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC CISF-AC-EXE &#8211; 2019<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-cisf-ac-exe-2019.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-cisf-ac-exe-2019\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nSection 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to Sections 25 and 26, which generally make confessions to police officers or while in police custody inadmissible. Section 27 states that when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved. This means that a part of a confession leading to the discovery of a fact is admissible.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\n&#8211; Section 25: Confession to police officer is inadmissible.<br \/>\n&#8211; Section 26: Confession while in police custody is inadmissible, unless made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate.<br \/>\n&#8211; Section 24: Confession caused by inducement, threat, or promise is irrelevant (involuntary).<br \/>\n&#8211; Section 27 is a proviso to Sections 25 and 26, making information leading to discovery admissible under specific conditions.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nOption A is incorrect because Section 25 makes confessions to police officers inadmissible. Option B is incorrect because confessions obtained by threat or inducement are generally involuntary and inadmissible under Section 24. Option C is incorrect because involuntary confessions are not admissible. Option D correctly identifies that confessions (or parts thereof amounting to information) are admissible under the specific conditions laid down in Section 27, which is a crucial exception allowing for the admissibility of discovered facts based on information from the accused in custody.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is correct? [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Confession made to a police officer under Section 25 is admissible.&#8221; option2=&#8221;Confession obtained by threat or inducement by a police officer is admissible.&#8221; option3=&#8221;Involuntary confession is admissible.&#8221; option4=&#8221;Confession under Section 27 is admissible.&#8221; correct=&#8221;option4&#8243;] This question &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/#more-92740\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1089],"tags":[1119,1099,1115],"class_list":["post-92740","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cisf-ac-exe","tag-1119","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-miscellaneous","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to Sections 25 and 26, which generally make confessions to police officers or while in police custody inadmissible. Section 27 states that when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved. This means that a part of a confession leading to the discovery of a fact is admissible. - Section 25: Confession to police officer is inadmissible. - Section 26: Confession while in police custody is inadmissible, unless made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate. - Section 24: Confession caused by inducement, threat, or promise is irrelevant (involuntary). - Section 27 is a proviso to Sections 25 and 26, making information leading to discovery admissible under specific conditions.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to Sections 25 and 26, which generally make confessions to police officers or while in police custody inadmissible. Section 27 states that when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved. This means that a part of a confession leading to the discovery of a fact is admissible. - Section 25: Confession to police officer is inadmissible. - Section 26: Confession while in police custody is inadmissible, unless made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate. - Section 24: Confession caused by inducement, threat, or promise is irrelevant (involuntary). - Section 27 is a proviso to Sections 25 and 26, making information leading to discovery admissible under specific conditions.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:31:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under","description":"Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to Sections 25 and 26, which generally make confessions to police officers or while in police custody inadmissible. Section 27 states that when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved. This means that a part of a confession leading to the discovery of a fact is admissible. - Section 25: Confession to police officer is inadmissible. - Section 26: Confession while in police custody is inadmissible, unless made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate. - Section 24: Confession caused by inducement, threat, or promise is irrelevant (involuntary). - Section 27 is a proviso to Sections 25 and 26, making information leading to discovery admissible under specific conditions.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under","og_description":"Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to Sections 25 and 26, which generally make confessions to police officers or while in police custody inadmissible. Section 27 states that when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved. This means that a part of a confession leading to the discovery of a fact is admissible. - Section 25: Confession to police officer is inadmissible. - Section 26: Confession while in police custody is inadmissible, unless made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate. - Section 24: Confession caused by inducement, threat, or promise is irrelevant (involuntary). - Section 27 is a proviso to Sections 25 and 26, making information leading to discovery admissible under specific conditions.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:31:41+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/","name":"Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:31:41+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:31:41+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is an exception to Sections 25 and 26, which generally make confessions to police officers or while in police custody inadmissible. Section 27 states that when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved. This means that a part of a confession leading to the discovery of a fact is admissible. - Section 25: Confession to police officer is inadmissible. - Section 26: Confession while in police custody is inadmissible, unless made in the immediate presence of a Magistrate. - Section 24: Confession caused by inducement, threat, or promise is irrelevant (involuntary). - Section 27 is a proviso to Sections 25 and 26, making information leading to discovery admissible under specific conditions.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-with-respect-to-confession-under\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CISF-AC-EXE","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cisf-ac-exe\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following statements with respect to confession under"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92740","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92740"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92740\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92740"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92740"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92740"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}