{"id":92590,"date":"2025-06-01T11:28:36","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:28:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=92590"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:28:36","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:28:36","slug":"a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the\/","title":{"rendered":"\u2018A\u2019 is charged with travelling on a train without a ticket. As per the"},"content":{"rendered":"

\u2018A\u2019 is charged with travelling on a train without a ticket. As per the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, who among the following has to prove that he had a ticket?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”\u2018A\u2019 has to prove it” option2=”Guilt is always to be proved by the prosecution” option3=”The Court will decide it” option4=”It is proved the moment \u2018A\u2019 is caught without ticket” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2018<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe correct answer is A) \u2018A\u2019 has to prove it.
\n<\/section>\n
\nUnder the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the general rule is that the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts a fact. However, Section 106 of the Act provides an important exception: “When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him.” Whether a person has a ticket for travelling on a train is a fact that is specifically within their personal knowledge. Therefore, if charged with travelling without a ticket, the burden of proving that they did possess a ticket rests upon the accused (‘A’ in this case).
\n<\/section>\n
\nThis principle is applied in various situations where the truth of a matter is peculiarly within the knowledge of one party. It’s an exception to the general rule that the prosecution must prove the guilt beyond reasonable doubt. In this specific scenario, proving the negative (that ‘A’ did *not* have a ticket) is difficult for the prosecution, while proving the positive (that ‘A’ *did* have a ticket) is straightforward for ‘A’ if it is true.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u2018A\u2019 is charged with travelling on a train without a ticket. As per the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, who among the following has to prove that he had a ticket? [amp_mcq option1=”\u2018A\u2019 has to prove it” option2=”Guilt is always to be proved by the prosecution” option3=”The Court will decide it” option4=”It is proved the moment … <\/p>\n

Detailed Solution\u2018A\u2019 is charged with travelling on a train without a ticket. As per the<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1089],"tags":[1114,1099,1115],"class_list":["post-92590","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cisf-ac-exe","tag-1114","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-miscellaneous","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\n\u2018A\u2019 is charged with travelling on a train without a ticket. As per the<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The correct answer is A) \u2018A\u2019 has to prove it. Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the general rule is that the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts a fact. However, Section 106 of the Act provides an important exception: "When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him." Whether a person has a ticket for travelling on a train is a fact that is specifically within their personal knowledge. Therefore, if charged with travelling without a ticket, the burden of proving that they did possess a ticket rests upon the accused ('A' in this case).\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"\u2018A\u2019 is charged with travelling on a train without a ticket. As per the\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The correct answer is A) \u2018A\u2019 has to prove it. Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the general rule is that the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts a fact. However, Section 106 of the Act provides an important exception: "When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him." Whether a person has a ticket for travelling on a train is a fact that is specifically within their personal knowledge. Therefore, if charged with travelling without a ticket, the burden of proving that they did possess a ticket rests upon the accused ('A' in this case).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:28:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"\u2018A\u2019 is charged with travelling on a train without a ticket. As per the","description":"The correct answer is A) \u2018A\u2019 has to prove it. Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the general rule is that the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts a fact. However, Section 106 of the Act provides an important exception: \"When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him.\" Whether a person has a ticket for travelling on a train is a fact that is specifically within their personal knowledge. Therefore, if charged with travelling without a ticket, the burden of proving that they did possess a ticket rests upon the accused ('A' in this case).","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"\u2018A\u2019 is charged with travelling on a train without a ticket. As per the","og_description":"The correct answer is A) \u2018A\u2019 has to prove it. Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the general rule is that the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts a fact. However, Section 106 of the Act provides an important exception: \"When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him.\" Whether a person has a ticket for travelling on a train is a fact that is specifically within their personal knowledge. Therefore, if charged with travelling without a ticket, the burden of proving that they did possess a ticket rests upon the accused ('A' in this case).","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:28:36+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the\/","name":"\u2018A\u2019 is charged with travelling on a train without a ticket. As per the","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:28:36+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:28:36+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The correct answer is A) \u2018A\u2019 has to prove it. Under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the general rule is that the burden of proof lies on the person who asserts a fact. However, Section 106 of the Act provides an important exception: \"When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him.\" Whether a person has a ticket for travelling on a train is a fact that is specifically within their personal knowledge. Therefore, if charged with travelling without a ticket, the burden of proving that they did possess a ticket rests upon the accused ('A' in this case).","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/a-is-charged-with-travelling-on-a-train-without-a-ticket-as-per-the\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CISF-AC-EXE","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cisf-ac-exe\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"\u2018A\u2019 is charged with travelling on a train without a ticket. As per the"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92590","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92590"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92590\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92590"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92590"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92590"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}