{"id":92467,"date":"2025-06-01T11:25:18","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:25:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=92467"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:25:18","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:25:18","slug":"as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute\/","title":{"rendered":"As per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute"},"content":{"rendered":"

As per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute to be termed as ‘Industrial Dispute’ must be between<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”employers and employers” option2=”workmen and workmen” option3=”employers and workmen” option4=”All of the above” correct=”option4″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe correct option is D. As per the definition in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an ‘Industrial Dispute’ must be between employers and employers, employers and workmen, or workmen and workmen.
\n<\/section>\n
\nSection 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 defines “industrial dispute” as “any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which is connected with the employment or non-employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour, of any person”.
\nLet’s examine the options:
\nA) employers and employers: Included in the definition.
\nB) workmen and workmen: Included in the definition.
\nC) employers and workmen: Included in the definition.
\nSince all three pairs are explicitly mentioned in the definition, a dispute between any of these parties can be termed an ‘Industrial Dispute’ if it meets the other criteria related to employment terms or labour conditions.
\n<\/section>\n
\nThe broad definition of ‘industrial dispute’ in the Act is intended to cover a wide range of conflicts arising in industrial relations, allowing for their resolution through the mechanisms provided by the Act, such as conciliation, arbitration, and adjudication. The dispute must involve persons who fall within the definitions of ’employer’ or ‘workman’ under the Act.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute to be termed as ‘Industrial Dispute’ must be between [amp_mcq option1=”employers and employers” option2=”workmen and workmen” option3=”employers and workmen” option4=”All of the above” correct=”option4″] This question was previously asked in UPSC CISF-AC-EXE – 2017 Download PDFAttempt Online The correct option is D. As … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionAs per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1089],"tags":[1101,1099,1104],"class_list":["post-92467","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cisf-ac-exe","tag-1101","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-the-parliamentary-act","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nAs per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The correct option is D. As per the definition in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an 'Industrial Dispute' must be between employers and employers, employers and workmen, or workmen and workmen. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 defines "industrial dispute" as "any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which is connected with the employment or non-employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour, of any person". Let's examine the options: A) employers and employers: Included in the definition. B) workmen and workmen: Included in the definition. C) employers and workmen: Included in the definition. Since all three pairs are explicitly mentioned in the definition, a dispute between any of these parties can be termed an 'Industrial Dispute' if it meets the other criteria related to employment terms or labour conditions.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"As per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The correct option is D. As per the definition in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an 'Industrial Dispute' must be between employers and employers, employers and workmen, or workmen and workmen. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 defines "industrial dispute" as "any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which is connected with the employment or non-employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour, of any person". Let's examine the options: A) employers and employers: Included in the definition. B) workmen and workmen: Included in the definition. C) employers and workmen: Included in the definition. Since all three pairs are explicitly mentioned in the definition, a dispute between any of these parties can be termed an 'Industrial Dispute' if it meets the other criteria related to employment terms or labour conditions.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:25:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"As per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute","description":"The correct option is D. As per the definition in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an 'Industrial Dispute' must be between employers and employers, employers and workmen, or workmen and workmen. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 defines \"industrial dispute\" as \"any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which is connected with the employment or non-employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour, of any person\". Let's examine the options: A) employers and employers: Included in the definition. B) workmen and workmen: Included in the definition. C) employers and workmen: Included in the definition. Since all three pairs are explicitly mentioned in the definition, a dispute between any of these parties can be termed an 'Industrial Dispute' if it meets the other criteria related to employment terms or labour conditions.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"As per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute","og_description":"The correct option is D. As per the definition in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an 'Industrial Dispute' must be between employers and employers, employers and workmen, or workmen and workmen. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 defines \"industrial dispute\" as \"any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which is connected with the employment or non-employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour, of any person\". Let's examine the options: A) employers and employers: Included in the definition. B) workmen and workmen: Included in the definition. C) employers and workmen: Included in the definition. Since all three pairs are explicitly mentioned in the definition, a dispute between any of these parties can be termed an 'Industrial Dispute' if it meets the other criteria related to employment terms or labour conditions.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:25:18+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute\/","name":"As per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:25:18+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:25:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The correct option is D. As per the definition in the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an 'Industrial Dispute' must be between employers and employers, employers and workmen, or workmen and workmen. Section 2(k) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 defines \"industrial dispute\" as \"any dispute or difference between employers and employers, or between employers and workmen, or between workmen and workmen, which is connected with the employment or non-employment or the terms of employment or with the conditions of labour, of any person\". Let's examine the options: A) employers and employers: Included in the definition. B) workmen and workmen: Included in the definition. C) employers and workmen: Included in the definition. Since all three pairs are explicitly mentioned in the definition, a dispute between any of these parties can be termed an 'Industrial Dispute' if it meets the other criteria related to employment terms or labour conditions.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/as-per-the-provisions-of-the-industrial-disputes-act-1947-a-dispute\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CISF-AC-EXE","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cisf-ac-exe\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"As per the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, a dispute"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92467","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92467"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92467\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92467"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92467"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92467"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}