{"id":92459,"date":"2025-06-01T11:25:09","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:25:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=92459"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:25:09","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:25:09","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following statements is not correct ?\nA) In the absen"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following statements is not correct ?<br \/>\nA) In the absence of a specific order of confirmation or a declaration of satisfactory completion of probation, a member of the Central Industrial Security Force is deemed to be on probation.<br \/>\nB) A member of the Central Industrial Security Force is deemed to have successfully completed his probation, if it is not extended before the completion of the probation period specified in the relevant rules.<br \/>\nC) No member of the Force shall ordinarily be kept on probation for more than twice the period prescribed in the relevant rules.<br \/>\nD) Members of the Force appointed on deputation\/absorption need not be kept on probation.<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;In the absence of a specific order of confirmation or a declaration of satisfactory completion of probation, a member of the Central Industrial Security Force is deemed to be on probation.&#8221; option2=&#8221;A member of the Central Industrial Security Force is deemed to have successfully completed his probation, if it is not extended before the completion of the probation period specified in the relevant rules.&#8221; option3=&#8221;No member of the Force shall ordinarily be kept on probation for more than twice the period prescribed in the relevant rules.&#8221; option4=&#8221;Members of the Force appointed on deputation\/absorption need not be kept on probation.&#8221; correct=&#8221;option2&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC CISF-AC-EXE &#8211; 2017<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-cisf-ac-exe-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-cisf-ac-exe-2017\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nRule 10(1) of the CISF Rules, 2001 states that a member shall be on probation. The second proviso to Rule 10(1) states that &#8220;in the absence of any specific order of confirmation or a declaration that the probation has been satisfactorily completed, the member shall be deemed to be on probation.&#8221; Statement A is consistent with this proviso. Statement B claims that a member is *deemed to have successfully completed* probation if it is not extended before the completion of the period. This directly contradicts the rule, which states they are *deemed to be on probation* in such a scenario (unless confirmed). Statement B is therefore not correct. Statements C and D are correct as per Rule 10(2) and Rule 10(5) respectively.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\n&#8211; Rule 10 of CISF Rules, 2001 governs probation.<br \/>\n&#8211; Probation period and possible extensions are defined.<br \/>\n&#8211; Deemed status during probation is specifically regulated.<br \/>\n&#8211; Members appointed on deputation\/absorption have different probation requirements.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\n&#8211; Successful completion of probation typically requires a formal order of confirmation or a declaration to that effect. Merely not extending the probation period does not automatically lead to deemed successful completion or confirmation under these rules; it leads to the member continuing to be on probation until an order is issued.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following statements is not correct ? A) In the absence of a specific order of confirmation or a declaration of satisfactory completion of probation, a member of the Central Industrial Security Force is deemed to be on probation. B) A member of the Central Industrial Security Force is deemed to have &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Which one of the following statements is not correct ?\nA) In the absen\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/#more-92459\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Which one of the following statements is not correct ?<br \/>\nA) In the absen<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1089],"tags":[1101,1099,1104],"class_list":["post-92459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cisf-ac-exe","tag-1101","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-the-parliamentary-act","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Which one of the following statements is not correct ? A) In the absen<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Rule 10(1) of the CISF Rules, 2001 states that a member shall be on probation. The second proviso to Rule 10(1) states that &quot;in the absence of any specific order of confirmation or a declaration that the probation has been satisfactorily completed, the member shall be deemed to be on probation.&quot; Statement A is consistent with this proviso. Statement B claims that a member is *deemed to have successfully completed* probation if it is not extended before the completion of the period. This directly contradicts the rule, which states they are *deemed to be on probation* in such a scenario (unless confirmed). Statement B is therefore not correct. Statements C and D are correct as per Rule 10(2) and Rule 10(5) respectively. - Rule 10 of CISF Rules, 2001 governs probation. - Probation period and possible extensions are defined. - Deemed status during probation is specifically regulated. - Members appointed on deputation\/absorption have different probation requirements.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following statements is not correct ? A) In the absen\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Rule 10(1) of the CISF Rules, 2001 states that a member shall be on probation. The second proviso to Rule 10(1) states that &quot;in the absence of any specific order of confirmation or a declaration that the probation has been satisfactorily completed, the member shall be deemed to be on probation.&quot; Statement A is consistent with this proviso. Statement B claims that a member is *deemed to have successfully completed* probation if it is not extended before the completion of the period. This directly contradicts the rule, which states they are *deemed to be on probation* in such a scenario (unless confirmed). Statement B is therefore not correct. Statements C and D are correct as per Rule 10(2) and Rule 10(5) respectively. - Rule 10 of CISF Rules, 2001 governs probation. - Probation period and possible extensions are defined. - Deemed status during probation is specifically regulated. - Members appointed on deputation\/absorption have different probation requirements.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:25:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following statements is not correct ? A) In the absen","description":"Rule 10(1) of the CISF Rules, 2001 states that a member shall be on probation. The second proviso to Rule 10(1) states that \"in the absence of any specific order of confirmation or a declaration that the probation has been satisfactorily completed, the member shall be deemed to be on probation.\" Statement A is consistent with this proviso. Statement B claims that a member is *deemed to have successfully completed* probation if it is not extended before the completion of the period. This directly contradicts the rule, which states they are *deemed to be on probation* in such a scenario (unless confirmed). Statement B is therefore not correct. Statements C and D are correct as per Rule 10(2) and Rule 10(5) respectively. - Rule 10 of CISF Rules, 2001 governs probation. - Probation period and possible extensions are defined. - Deemed status during probation is specifically regulated. - Members appointed on deputation\/absorption have different probation requirements.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following statements is not correct ? A) In the absen","og_description":"Rule 10(1) of the CISF Rules, 2001 states that a member shall be on probation. The second proviso to Rule 10(1) states that \"in the absence of any specific order of confirmation or a declaration that the probation has been satisfactorily completed, the member shall be deemed to be on probation.\" Statement A is consistent with this proviso. Statement B claims that a member is *deemed to have successfully completed* probation if it is not extended before the completion of the period. This directly contradicts the rule, which states they are *deemed to be on probation* in such a scenario (unless confirmed). Statement B is therefore not correct. Statements C and D are correct as per Rule 10(2) and Rule 10(5) respectively. - Rule 10 of CISF Rules, 2001 governs probation. - Probation period and possible extensions are defined. - Deemed status during probation is specifically regulated. - Members appointed on deputation\/absorption have different probation requirements.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:25:09+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/","name":"Which one of the following statements is not correct ? A) In the absen","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:25:09+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:25:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Rule 10(1) of the CISF Rules, 2001 states that a member shall be on probation. The second proviso to Rule 10(1) states that \"in the absence of any specific order of confirmation or a declaration that the probation has been satisfactorily completed, the member shall be deemed to be on probation.\" Statement A is consistent with this proviso. Statement B claims that a member is *deemed to have successfully completed* probation if it is not extended before the completion of the period. This directly contradicts the rule, which states they are *deemed to be on probation* in such a scenario (unless confirmed). Statement B is therefore not correct. Statements C and D are correct as per Rule 10(2) and Rule 10(5) respectively. - Rule 10 of CISF Rules, 2001 governs probation. - Probation period and possible extensions are defined. - Deemed status during probation is specifically regulated. - Members appointed on deputation\/absorption have different probation requirements.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-is-not-correct-a-in-the-absen\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CISF-AC-EXE","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cisf-ac-exe\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following statements is not correct ? A) In the absen"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92459"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92459\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}