{"id":92441,"date":"2025-06-01T11:24:39","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:24:39","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=92441"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:24:39","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:24:39","slug":"under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/","title":{"rendered":"Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession befo"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession before a police officer by the accused in the custody of the police officer becomes relevant, if<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;the accused is a minor&#8221; option2=&#8221;the accused is a repeat offender&#8221; option3=&#8221;evidence is discovered in consequence of the confession&#8221; option4=&#8221;None of the above&#8221; correct=&#8221;option3&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC CISF-AC-EXE &#8211; 2017<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-cisf-ac-exe-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-cisf-ac-exe-2017\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nThe correct answer is C) evidence is discovered in consequence of the confession.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\nSections 25 and 26 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, generally make confessions made to a police officer or while in police custody (unless before a Magistrate) inadmissible. However, Section 27 provides a crucial exception: &#8220;when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved.&#8221; This is the &#8216;discovery&#8217; rule, where the part of the confession leading to a material discovery becomes relevant and admissible.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nThis exception under Section 27 is based on the principle that the discovery of a fact guarantees the truthfulness of the information received from the accused to that extent. Factors like the accused being a minor or a repeat offender (Options A and B) do not make a confession before a police officer admissible under the Act.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession before a police officer by the accused in the custody of the police officer becomes relevant, if [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;the accused is a minor&#8221; option2=&#8221;the accused is a repeat offender&#8221; option3=&#8221;evidence is discovered in consequence of the confession&#8221; option4=&#8221;None of the above&#8221; correct=&#8221;option3&#8243;] This question was &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession befo\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/#more-92441\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession befo<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1089],"tags":[1101,1099,1115],"class_list":["post-92441","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cisf-ac-exe","tag-1101","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-miscellaneous","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession befo<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The correct answer is C) evidence is discovered in consequence of the confession. Sections 25 and 26 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, generally make confessions made to a police officer or while in police custody (unless before a Magistrate) inadmissible. However, Section 27 provides a crucial exception: &quot;when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved.&quot; This is the &#039;discovery&#039; rule, where the part of the confession leading to a material discovery becomes relevant and admissible.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession befo\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The correct answer is C) evidence is discovered in consequence of the confession. Sections 25 and 26 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, generally make confessions made to a police officer or while in police custody (unless before a Magistrate) inadmissible. However, Section 27 provides a crucial exception: &quot;when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved.&quot; This is the &#039;discovery&#039; rule, where the part of the confession leading to a material discovery becomes relevant and admissible.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:24:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession befo","description":"The correct answer is C) evidence is discovered in consequence of the confession. Sections 25 and 26 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, generally make confessions made to a police officer or while in police custody (unless before a Magistrate) inadmissible. However, Section 27 provides a crucial exception: \"when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved.\" This is the 'discovery' rule, where the part of the confession leading to a material discovery becomes relevant and admissible.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession befo","og_description":"The correct answer is C) evidence is discovered in consequence of the confession. Sections 25 and 26 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, generally make confessions made to a police officer or while in police custody (unless before a Magistrate) inadmissible. However, Section 27 provides a crucial exception: \"when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved.\" This is the 'discovery' rule, where the part of the confession leading to a material discovery becomes relevant and admissible.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:24:39+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/","name":"Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession befo","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:24:39+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:24:39+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The correct answer is C) evidence is discovered in consequence of the confession. Sections 25 and 26 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, generally make confessions made to a police officer or while in police custody (unless before a Magistrate) inadmissible. However, Section 27 provides a crucial exception: \"when any fact is deposed to as discovered in consequence of information received from a person accused of any offence, in the custody of a police officer, so much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered, may be proved.\" This is the 'discovery' rule, where the part of the confession leading to a material discovery becomes relevant and admissible.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/under-the-provisions-of-the-indian-evidence-act-1872-confession-befo\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CISF-AC-EXE","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cisf-ac-exe\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Under the provisions of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, confession befo"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92441","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92441"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92441\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92441"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92441"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92441"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}