{"id":92038,"date":"2025-06-01T11:12:37","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:12:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=92038"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:12:37","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:12:37","slug":"consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/","title":{"rendered":"Consider the following statements:\nStatement-I: The Supreme Court of I"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Consider the following statements:<br \/>\nStatement-I: The Supreme Court of India has held in some judgements that the reservation policies made under Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India would be limited by Article 335 for maintenance of efficiency of administration.<br \/>\nStatement-II: Article 335 of the Constitution of India defines the term &#8216;efficiency of administration&#8217;.<br \/>\nWhich one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is the correct explanation for Statement-I&#8221; option2=&#8221;Both Statement-I and Statement-II are correct and Statement-II is not the correct explanation for Statement-I&#8221; option3=&#8221;Statement-I is correct but Statement-II is incorrect&#8221; option4=&#8221;Statement-I is incorrect but Statement-II is correct&#8221; correct=&#8221;option3&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC IAS &#8211; 2023<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-ias-2023.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-ias-2023\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nStatement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\nStatement-I: The Supreme Court of India has indeed held in several judgments that the State&#8217;s power to make reservations under Article 16(4) must be exercised while keeping in view the maintenance of efficiency of administration, as stipulated in Article 335. This balancing act is a key aspect of reservation jurisprudence in India.<br \/>\nStatement-II: Article 335 of the Constitution states that the claims of SCs and STs shall be considered &#8220;consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration&#8221;. However, it does not define the term &#8216;efficiency of administration&#8217;. The scope and meaning of this term in the context of reservations have been subject to judicial interpretation rather than being defined in the Article itself.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nImportant Supreme Court cases like M. Nagaraj (2006) and Jarnail Singh (2018, 2022) have elaborated on the principles governing reservations, reaffirming that quantifiable data on backwardness, inadequacy of representation, and the impact on administrative efficiency (derived from Article 335) are essential considerations.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Supreme Court of India has held in some judgements that the reservation policies made under Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India would be limited by Article 335 for maintenance of efficiency of administration. Statement-II: Article 335 of the Constitution of India defines the term &#8216;efficiency of administration&#8217;. Which &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Consider the following statements:\nStatement-I: The Supreme Court of I\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/#more-92038\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Consider the following statements:<br \/>\nStatement-I: The Supreme Court of I<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1092],"tags":[1105,1334,1099],"class_list":["post-92038","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-ias","tag-1105","tag-articles-of-the-constitution","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Supreme Court of I<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect. Statement-I: The Supreme Court of India has indeed held in several judgments that the State&#039;s power to make reservations under Article 16(4) must be exercised while keeping in view the maintenance of efficiency of administration, as stipulated in Article 335. This balancing act is a key aspect of reservation jurisprudence in India. Statement-II: Article 335 of the Constitution states that the claims of SCs and STs shall be considered &quot;consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration&quot;. However, it does not define the term &#039;efficiency of administration&#039;. The scope and meaning of this term in the context of reservations have been subject to judicial interpretation rather than being defined in the Article itself.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Supreme Court of I\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect. Statement-I: The Supreme Court of India has indeed held in several judgments that the State&#039;s power to make reservations under Article 16(4) must be exercised while keeping in view the maintenance of efficiency of administration, as stipulated in Article 335. This balancing act is a key aspect of reservation jurisprudence in India. Statement-II: Article 335 of the Constitution states that the claims of SCs and STs shall be considered &quot;consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration&quot;. However, it does not define the term &#039;efficiency of administration&#039;. The scope and meaning of this term in the context of reservations have been subject to judicial interpretation rather than being defined in the Article itself.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:12:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Supreme Court of I","description":"Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect. Statement-I: The Supreme Court of India has indeed held in several judgments that the State's power to make reservations under Article 16(4) must be exercised while keeping in view the maintenance of efficiency of administration, as stipulated in Article 335. This balancing act is a key aspect of reservation jurisprudence in India. Statement-II: Article 335 of the Constitution states that the claims of SCs and STs shall be considered \"consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration\". However, it does not define the term 'efficiency of administration'. The scope and meaning of this term in the context of reservations have been subject to judicial interpretation rather than being defined in the Article itself.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Supreme Court of I","og_description":"Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect. Statement-I: The Supreme Court of India has indeed held in several judgments that the State's power to make reservations under Article 16(4) must be exercised while keeping in view the maintenance of efficiency of administration, as stipulated in Article 335. This balancing act is a key aspect of reservation jurisprudence in India. Statement-II: Article 335 of the Constitution states that the claims of SCs and STs shall be considered \"consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration\". However, it does not define the term 'efficiency of administration'. The scope and meaning of this term in the context of reservations have been subject to judicial interpretation rather than being defined in the Article itself.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:12:37+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/","name":"Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Supreme Court of I","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:12:37+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:12:37+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Statement-I is correct, but Statement-II is incorrect. Statement-I: The Supreme Court of India has indeed held in several judgments that the State's power to make reservations under Article 16(4) must be exercised while keeping in view the maintenance of efficiency of administration, as stipulated in Article 335. This balancing act is a key aspect of reservation jurisprudence in India. Statement-II: Article 335 of the Constitution states that the claims of SCs and STs shall be considered \"consistently with the maintenance of efficiency of administration\". However, it does not define the term 'efficiency of administration'. The scope and meaning of this term in the context of reservations have been subject to judicial interpretation rather than being defined in the Article itself.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/consider-the-following-statementsstatement-i-the-supreme-court-of-i\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC IAS","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-ias\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Consider the following statements: Statement-I: The Supreme Court of I"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92038","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92038"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92038\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92038"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92038"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92038"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}