{"id":92033,"date":"2025-06-01T11:12:31","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:12:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=92033"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:12:31","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:12:31","slug":"in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/","title":{"rendered":"In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was wid"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was widely believed to be enacted to overcome the judicial interpretations of the Fundamental Rights?<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;1st Amendment&#8221; option2=&#8221;42nd Amendment&#8221; option3=&#8221;44th Amendment&#8221; option4=&#8221;86th Amendment&#8221; correct=&#8221;option1&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC IAS &#8211; 2023<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-ias-2023.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-ias-2023\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nThe 1st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, was enacted primarily to overcome certain judicial interpretations of Fundamental Rights. Specifically, it aimed to validate Zamindari abolition laws and other land reform measures that had been challenged in courts based on the Right to Property (Article 31). The Amendment added Articles 31A and 31B, and the Ninth Schedule, to protect such laws from judicial review on the grounds of contravention of Fundamental Rights. It also amended Article 19(1)(a) by adding new grounds for restricting freedom of speech and expression, following court judgments (like Ramesh Thappar case) that interpreted the scope of this right. This was the first significant instance where Parliament amended the constitution specifically to counter judicial decisions on Fundamental Rights.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\nThe 1st Amendment is a landmark example of the legislature responding to judicial review by amending the Constitution, particularly in the context of Fundamental Rights, setting a precedent for future legislative-judicial interactions.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nThe 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, also sought to limit judicial review and enhance parliamentary supremacy, significantly impacting Fundamental Rights and their relationship with Directive Principles, partly as a reaction to judicial pronouncements like the Kesavananda Bharati case. However, the 1st Amendment was the initial and direct legislative measure aimed at overcoming specific judicial interpretations of Fundamental Rights related to property and speech.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was widely believed to be enacted to overcome the judicial interpretations of the Fundamental Rights? [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;1st Amendment&#8221; option2=&#8221;42nd Amendment&#8221; option3=&#8221;44th Amendment&#8221; option4=&#8221;86th Amendment&#8221; correct=&#8221;option1&#8243;] This question was previously asked in UPSC IAS &#8211; 2023 Download PDFAttempt Online The 1st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, was enacted &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was wid\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/#more-92033\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was wid<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1092],"tags":[1105,1192,1099],"class_list":["post-92033","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-ias","tag-1105","tag-constitutional-amendments","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was wid<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The 1st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, was enacted primarily to overcome certain judicial interpretations of Fundamental Rights. Specifically, it aimed to validate Zamindari abolition laws and other land reform measures that had been challenged in courts based on the Right to Property (Article 31). The Amendment added Articles 31A and 31B, and the Ninth Schedule, to protect such laws from judicial review on the grounds of contravention of Fundamental Rights. It also amended Article 19(1)(a) by adding new grounds for restricting freedom of speech and expression, following court judgments (like Ramesh Thappar case) that interpreted the scope of this right. This was the first significant instance where Parliament amended the constitution specifically to counter judicial decisions on Fundamental Rights. The 1st Amendment is a landmark example of the legislature responding to judicial review by amending the Constitution, particularly in the context of Fundamental Rights, setting a precedent for future legislative-judicial interactions.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was wid\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The 1st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, was enacted primarily to overcome certain judicial interpretations of Fundamental Rights. Specifically, it aimed to validate Zamindari abolition laws and other land reform measures that had been challenged in courts based on the Right to Property (Article 31). The Amendment added Articles 31A and 31B, and the Ninth Schedule, to protect such laws from judicial review on the grounds of contravention of Fundamental Rights. It also amended Article 19(1)(a) by adding new grounds for restricting freedom of speech and expression, following court judgments (like Ramesh Thappar case) that interpreted the scope of this right. This was the first significant instance where Parliament amended the constitution specifically to counter judicial decisions on Fundamental Rights. The 1st Amendment is a landmark example of the legislature responding to judicial review by amending the Constitution, particularly in the context of Fundamental Rights, setting a precedent for future legislative-judicial interactions.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:12:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was wid","description":"The 1st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, was enacted primarily to overcome certain judicial interpretations of Fundamental Rights. Specifically, it aimed to validate Zamindari abolition laws and other land reform measures that had been challenged in courts based on the Right to Property (Article 31). The Amendment added Articles 31A and 31B, and the Ninth Schedule, to protect such laws from judicial review on the grounds of contravention of Fundamental Rights. It also amended Article 19(1)(a) by adding new grounds for restricting freedom of speech and expression, following court judgments (like Ramesh Thappar case) that interpreted the scope of this right. This was the first significant instance where Parliament amended the constitution specifically to counter judicial decisions on Fundamental Rights. The 1st Amendment is a landmark example of the legislature responding to judicial review by amending the Constitution, particularly in the context of Fundamental Rights, setting a precedent for future legislative-judicial interactions.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was wid","og_description":"The 1st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, was enacted primarily to overcome certain judicial interpretations of Fundamental Rights. Specifically, it aimed to validate Zamindari abolition laws and other land reform measures that had been challenged in courts based on the Right to Property (Article 31). The Amendment added Articles 31A and 31B, and the Ninth Schedule, to protect such laws from judicial review on the grounds of contravention of Fundamental Rights. It also amended Article 19(1)(a) by adding new grounds for restricting freedom of speech and expression, following court judgments (like Ramesh Thappar case) that interpreted the scope of this right. This was the first significant instance where Parliament amended the constitution specifically to counter judicial decisions on Fundamental Rights. The 1st Amendment is a landmark example of the legislature responding to judicial review by amending the Constitution, particularly in the context of Fundamental Rights, setting a precedent for future legislative-judicial interactions.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:12:31+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/","name":"In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was wid","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:12:31+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:12:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The 1st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1951, was enacted primarily to overcome certain judicial interpretations of Fundamental Rights. Specifically, it aimed to validate Zamindari abolition laws and other land reform measures that had been challenged in courts based on the Right to Property (Article 31). The Amendment added Articles 31A and 31B, and the Ninth Schedule, to protect such laws from judicial review on the grounds of contravention of Fundamental Rights. It also amended Article 19(1)(a) by adding new grounds for restricting freedom of speech and expression, following court judgments (like Ramesh Thappar case) that interpreted the scope of this right. This was the first significant instance where Parliament amended the constitution specifically to counter judicial decisions on Fundamental Rights. The 1st Amendment is a landmark example of the legislature responding to judicial review by amending the Constitution, particularly in the context of Fundamental Rights, setting a precedent for future legislative-judicial interactions.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-india-which-one-of-the-following-constitutional-amendments-was-wid\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC IAS","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-ias\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"In India, which one of the following Constitutional Amendments was wid"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92033","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=92033"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92033\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=92033"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=92033"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=92033"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}