{"id":91880,"date":"2025-06-01T11:08:23","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:08:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=91880"},"modified":"2025-06-01T11:08:23","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T11:08:23","slug":"with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/","title":{"rendered":"With reference to India, consider the following statements :\n  1. Judi"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>With reference to India, consider the following statements :<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>1. Judicial custody means an accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate and such accused is locked up in police station, not in jail.<\/li>\n<li>2. During judicial custody, the police officer in charge of the case is not allowed to interrogate the suspect without the approval of the court.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Which of the statements given above is\/are correct?<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;1 only&#8221; option2=&#8221;2 only&#8221; option3=&#8221;Both 1 and 2&#8243; option4=&#8221;Neither 1 nor 2&#8243; correct=&#8221;option2&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC IAS &#8211; 2021<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-ias-2021.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-ias-2021\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nThe question asks for the correct statements regarding judicial custody in India.<br \/>\nStatement 1: Judicial custody means that the accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate (judicial authority), but they are locked up in a *jail*, not a police station. Custody in a police station lock-up is termed police custody. Thus, Statement 1 is not correct.<br \/>\nStatement 2: During judicial custody, the police investigating the case are not allowed to interrogate the suspect without first obtaining permission from the court (Magistrate). This is a safeguard against potential coercion and ensures judicial oversight. Thus, Statement 2 is correct.<br \/>\nBased on the analysis, only statement 2 is correct. Therefore, the correct option is B.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\n&#8211; Judicial custody implies custody under the court and detention in jail.<br \/>\n&#8211; Police custody implies custody under the police and detention in a police lock-up.<br \/>\n&#8211; Interrogation during judicial custody requires court permission.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nThe maximum period for police custody is typically 15 days from the date of arrest. After this, the accused must be remanded to judicial custody if investigations are ongoing, or released. The status of custody affects rights and procedures, such as the right to meet a lawyer and conditions of interrogation.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With reference to India, consider the following statements : 1. Judicial custody means an accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate and such accused is locked up in police station, not in jail. 2. During judicial custody, the police officer in charge of the case is not allowed to interrogate the suspect without &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"With reference to India, consider the following statements :\n  1. Judi\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/#more-91880\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">With reference to India, consider the following statements :<br \/>\n  1. Judi<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1092],"tags":[1110,1099,1115],"class_list":["post-91880","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-ias","tag-1110","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-miscellaneous","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>With reference to India, consider the following statements :  1. Judi<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The question asks for the correct statements regarding judicial custody in India. Statement 1: Judicial custody means that the accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate (judicial authority), but they are locked up in a *jail*, not a police station. Custody in a police station lock-up is termed police custody. Thus, Statement 1 is not correct. Statement 2: During judicial custody, the police investigating the case are not allowed to interrogate the suspect without first obtaining permission from the court (Magistrate). This is a safeguard against potential coercion and ensures judicial oversight. Thus, Statement 2 is correct. Based on the analysis, only statement 2 is correct. Therefore, the correct option is B. - Judicial custody implies custody under the court and detention in jail. - Police custody implies custody under the police and detention in a police lock-up. - Interrogation during judicial custody requires court permission.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"With reference to India, consider the following statements :  1. Judi\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The question asks for the correct statements regarding judicial custody in India. Statement 1: Judicial custody means that the accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate (judicial authority), but they are locked up in a *jail*, not a police station. Custody in a police station lock-up is termed police custody. Thus, Statement 1 is not correct. Statement 2: During judicial custody, the police investigating the case are not allowed to interrogate the suspect without first obtaining permission from the court (Magistrate). This is a safeguard against potential coercion and ensures judicial oversight. Thus, Statement 2 is correct. Based on the analysis, only statement 2 is correct. Therefore, the correct option is B. - Judicial custody implies custody under the court and detention in jail. - Police custody implies custody under the police and detention in a police lock-up. - Interrogation during judicial custody requires court permission.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T11:08:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"With reference to India, consider the following statements :  1. Judi","description":"The question asks for the correct statements regarding judicial custody in India. Statement 1: Judicial custody means that the accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate (judicial authority), but they are locked up in a *jail*, not a police station. Custody in a police station lock-up is termed police custody. Thus, Statement 1 is not correct. Statement 2: During judicial custody, the police investigating the case are not allowed to interrogate the suspect without first obtaining permission from the court (Magistrate). This is a safeguard against potential coercion and ensures judicial oversight. Thus, Statement 2 is correct. Based on the analysis, only statement 2 is correct. Therefore, the correct option is B. - Judicial custody implies custody under the court and detention in jail. - Police custody implies custody under the police and detention in a police lock-up. - Interrogation during judicial custody requires court permission.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"With reference to India, consider the following statements :  1. Judi","og_description":"The question asks for the correct statements regarding judicial custody in India. Statement 1: Judicial custody means that the accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate (judicial authority), but they are locked up in a *jail*, not a police station. Custody in a police station lock-up is termed police custody. Thus, Statement 1 is not correct. Statement 2: During judicial custody, the police investigating the case are not allowed to interrogate the suspect without first obtaining permission from the court (Magistrate). This is a safeguard against potential coercion and ensures judicial oversight. Thus, Statement 2 is correct. Based on the analysis, only statement 2 is correct. Therefore, the correct option is B. - Judicial custody implies custody under the court and detention in jail. - Police custody implies custody under the police and detention in a police lock-up. - Interrogation during judicial custody requires court permission.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T11:08:23+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/","name":"With reference to India, consider the following statements : 1. Judi","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T11:08:23+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T11:08:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The question asks for the correct statements regarding judicial custody in India. Statement 1: Judicial custody means that the accused is in the custody of the concerned magistrate (judicial authority), but they are locked up in a *jail*, not a police station. Custody in a police station lock-up is termed police custody. Thus, Statement 1 is not correct. Statement 2: During judicial custody, the police investigating the case are not allowed to interrogate the suspect without first obtaining permission from the court (Magistrate). This is a safeguard against potential coercion and ensures judicial oversight. Thus, Statement 2 is correct. Based on the analysis, only statement 2 is correct. Therefore, the correct option is B. - Judicial custody implies custody under the court and detention in jail. - Police custody implies custody under the police and detention in a police lock-up. - Interrogation during judicial custody requires court permission.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/with-reference-to-india-consider-the-following-statements-1-judi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC IAS","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-ias\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"With reference to India, consider the following statements : 1. Judi"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91880","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91880"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91880\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91880"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91880"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91880"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}