{"id":91487,"date":"2025-06-01T10:57:38","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:57:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=91487"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:57:38","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:57:38","slug":"in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy\/","title":{"rendered":"In the context of Indian history, the principle of \u2018Dyarchy (diarchy)\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"

In the context of Indian history, the principle of \u2018Dyarchy (diarchy)\u2019 refers to<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”Division of the central legislature into two houses” option2=”Introduction of double government i.e., Central and State governments” option3=”Having two sets of rulers; one in London and another in Delhi” option4=”Division of the subjects delegated to the provinces into two categories” correct=”option4″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC IAS – 2017<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe principle of ‘Dyarchy’ refers to the division of provincial subjects into two categories.
\n<\/section>\n
\n– Dyarchy (or Diarchy) was a system of double government introduced in British India by the Government of India Act 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms).
\n– It applied to the provinces. Provincial subjects were divided into two lists: ‘Reserved’ subjects (like finance, police, justice, land revenue) which were administered by the Governor and his Executive Council, who were responsible to the British Parliament.
\n– ‘Transferred’ subjects (like education, health, local government, public works) were administered by the Governor acting with ministers who were nominated from the elected members of the provincial legislature and were responsible to the legislature. This division of subjects into ‘Reserved’ and ‘Transferred’ is what constituted Dyarchy at the provincial level.
\n<\/section>\n
\nOptions A, B, and C describe different aspects of governance structures but do not accurately define the specific principle of ‘Dyarchy’ as implemented in British India. Option A describes a bicameral legislature. Option B describes federalism or double government (Centre and State) but not the specific nature of dual rule *within* the provincial executive. Option C describes the dual control from London and Delhi, which existed, but ‘Dyarchy’ specifically refers to the provincial executive arrangement.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In the context of Indian history, the principle of \u2018Dyarchy (diarchy)\u2019 refers to [amp_mcq option1=”Division of the central legislature into two houses” option2=”Introduction of double government i.e., Central and State governments” option3=”Having two sets of rulers; one in London and another in Delhi” option4=”Division of the subjects delegated to the provinces into two categories” correct=”option4″] … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionIn the context of Indian history, the principle of \u2018Dyarchy (diarchy)\u2019<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1092],"tags":[1101,1194,1124],"class_list":["post-91487","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-ias","tag-1101","tag-constitutional-development-of-india","tag-modern-history-of-india","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nIn the context of Indian history, the principle of \u2018Dyarchy (diarchy)\u2019<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The principle of 'Dyarchy' refers to the division of provincial subjects into two categories. - Dyarchy (or Diarchy) was a system of double government introduced in British India by the Government of India Act 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms). - It applied to the provinces. Provincial subjects were divided into two lists: 'Reserved' subjects (like finance, police, justice, land revenue) which were administered by the Governor and his Executive Council, who were responsible to the British Parliament. - 'Transferred' subjects (like education, health, local government, public works) were administered by the Governor acting with ministers who were nominated from the elected members of the provincial legislature and were responsible to the legislature. This division of subjects into 'Reserved' and 'Transferred' is what constituted Dyarchy at the provincial level.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"In the context of Indian history, the principle of \u2018Dyarchy (diarchy)\u2019\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The principle of 'Dyarchy' refers to the division of provincial subjects into two categories. - Dyarchy (or Diarchy) was a system of double government introduced in British India by the Government of India Act 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms). - It applied to the provinces. Provincial subjects were divided into two lists: 'Reserved' subjects (like finance, police, justice, land revenue) which were administered by the Governor and his Executive Council, who were responsible to the British Parliament. - 'Transferred' subjects (like education, health, local government, public works) were administered by the Governor acting with ministers who were nominated from the elected members of the provincial legislature and were responsible to the legislature. This division of subjects into 'Reserved' and 'Transferred' is what constituted Dyarchy at the provincial level.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:57:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"In the context of Indian history, the principle of \u2018Dyarchy (diarchy)\u2019","description":"The principle of 'Dyarchy' refers to the division of provincial subjects into two categories. - Dyarchy (or Diarchy) was a system of double government introduced in British India by the Government of India Act 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms). - It applied to the provinces. Provincial subjects were divided into two lists: 'Reserved' subjects (like finance, police, justice, land revenue) which were administered by the Governor and his Executive Council, who were responsible to the British Parliament. - 'Transferred' subjects (like education, health, local government, public works) were administered by the Governor acting with ministers who were nominated from the elected members of the provincial legislature and were responsible to the legislature. This division of subjects into 'Reserved' and 'Transferred' is what constituted Dyarchy at the provincial level.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"In the context of Indian history, the principle of \u2018Dyarchy (diarchy)\u2019","og_description":"The principle of 'Dyarchy' refers to the division of provincial subjects into two categories. - Dyarchy (or Diarchy) was a system of double government introduced in British India by the Government of India Act 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms). - It applied to the provinces. Provincial subjects were divided into two lists: 'Reserved' subjects (like finance, police, justice, land revenue) which were administered by the Governor and his Executive Council, who were responsible to the British Parliament. - 'Transferred' subjects (like education, health, local government, public works) were administered by the Governor acting with ministers who were nominated from the elected members of the provincial legislature and were responsible to the legislature. This division of subjects into 'Reserved' and 'Transferred' is what constituted Dyarchy at the provincial level.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:57:38+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy\/","name":"In the context of Indian history, the principle of \u2018Dyarchy (diarchy)\u2019","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:57:38+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:57:38+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The principle of 'Dyarchy' refers to the division of provincial subjects into two categories. - Dyarchy (or Diarchy) was a system of double government introduced in British India by the Government of India Act 1919 (Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms). - It applied to the provinces. Provincial subjects were divided into two lists: 'Reserved' subjects (like finance, police, justice, land revenue) which were administered by the Governor and his Executive Council, who were responsible to the British Parliament. - 'Transferred' subjects (like education, health, local government, public works) were administered by the Governor acting with ministers who were nominated from the elected members of the provincial legislature and were responsible to the legislature. This division of subjects into 'Reserved' and 'Transferred' is what constituted Dyarchy at the provincial level.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/in-the-context-of-indian-history-the-principle-of-dyarchy-diarchy\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC IAS","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-ias\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"In the context of Indian history, the principle of \u2018Dyarchy (diarchy)\u2019"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91487","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=91487"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/91487\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=91487"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=91487"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=91487"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}