{"id":90899,"date":"2025-06-01T10:39:57","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:39:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=90899"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:39:57","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:39:57","slug":"which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high\/","title":{"rendered":"Which among the following statements regarding the powers of the High"},"content":{"rendered":"

Which among the following statements regarding the powers of the High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not correct ?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”It can issue writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, quo warranto, certiorari, and prohibition.” option2=”Writs can be issued to enforce any rights conferred by Part-III and for any other purpose.” option3=”This power can derogate the power conferred on the Supreme Court under Article 32(2).” option4=”Writ can be issued to any authority under its jurisdiction.” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CAPF – 2023<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Statement C is incorrect. The power of the High Courts under Article 226 to issue writs is very wide and co-extensive with that of the Supreme Court under Article 32 in matters of fundamental rights, but it also extends to the enforcement of any other legal right, unlike Article 32 which is limited to fundamental rights. However, the High Court’s power under Article 226 does *not* derogate (lessen or diminish) the power conferred on the Supreme Court under Article 32(2). Recourse under Article 32 is itself a fundamental right, and it cannot be taken away or diluted by the existence of a parallel power under Article 226. Both powers exist independently, and the aggrieved person can approach either the High Court or the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of fundamental rights, although typically the High Court is approached first.<\/section>\n
Article 226 grants High Courts extensive writ jurisdiction to enforce fundamental rights and other legal rights. This power is a constitutional power parallel to Article 32, but it cannot negate or reduce the scope and force of the fundamental right guaranteed by Article 32 to directly approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamental rights.<\/section>\n
Statements A, B, and D correctly describe aspects of the High Court’s power under Article 226: they can issue the specified writs (A), for fundamental and other legal rights (B), against authorities within their territorial jurisdiction (D). The High Court’s power is discretionary compared to the mandatory nature of Article 32 when a fundamental right is violated.<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Which among the following statements regarding the powers of the High Courts under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not correct ? [amp_mcq option1=”It can issue writs of habeas corpus, mandamus, quo warranto, certiorari, and prohibition.” option2=”Writs can be issued to enforce any rights conferred by Part-III and for any other purpose.” option3=”This … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionWhich among the following statements regarding the powers of the High<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1085],"tags":[1105,1099,1315],"class_list":["post-90899","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-capf","tag-1105","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-the-high-court","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nWhich among the following statements regarding the powers of the High<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Statement C is incorrect. The power of the High Courts under Article 226 to issue writs is very wide and co-extensive with that of the Supreme Court under Article 32 in matters of fundamental rights, but it also extends to the enforcement of any other legal right, unlike Article 32 which is limited to fundamental rights. However, the High Court's power under Article 226 does *not* derogate (lessen or diminish) the power conferred on the Supreme Court under Article 32(2). Recourse under Article 32 is itself a fundamental right, and it cannot be taken away or diluted by the existence of a parallel power under Article 226. Both powers exist independently, and the aggrieved person can approach either the High Court or the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of fundamental rights, although typically the High Court is approached first. Article 226 grants High Courts extensive writ jurisdiction to enforce fundamental rights and other legal rights. This power is a constitutional power parallel to Article 32, but it cannot negate or reduce the scope and force of the fundamental right guaranteed by Article 32 to directly approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamental rights.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which among the following statements regarding the powers of the High\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Statement C is incorrect. The power of the High Courts under Article 226 to issue writs is very wide and co-extensive with that of the Supreme Court under Article 32 in matters of fundamental rights, but it also extends to the enforcement of any other legal right, unlike Article 32 which is limited to fundamental rights. However, the High Court's power under Article 226 does *not* derogate (lessen or diminish) the power conferred on the Supreme Court under Article 32(2). Recourse under Article 32 is itself a fundamental right, and it cannot be taken away or diluted by the existence of a parallel power under Article 226. Both powers exist independently, and the aggrieved person can approach either the High Court or the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of fundamental rights, although typically the High Court is approached first. Article 226 grants High Courts extensive writ jurisdiction to enforce fundamental rights and other legal rights. This power is a constitutional power parallel to Article 32, but it cannot negate or reduce the scope and force of the fundamental right guaranteed by Article 32 to directly approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamental rights.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:39:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which among the following statements regarding the powers of the High","description":"Statement C is incorrect. The power of the High Courts under Article 226 to issue writs is very wide and co-extensive with that of the Supreme Court under Article 32 in matters of fundamental rights, but it also extends to the enforcement of any other legal right, unlike Article 32 which is limited to fundamental rights. However, the High Court's power under Article 226 does *not* derogate (lessen or diminish) the power conferred on the Supreme Court under Article 32(2). Recourse under Article 32 is itself a fundamental right, and it cannot be taken away or diluted by the existence of a parallel power under Article 226. Both powers exist independently, and the aggrieved person can approach either the High Court or the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of fundamental rights, although typically the High Court is approached first. Article 226 grants High Courts extensive writ jurisdiction to enforce fundamental rights and other legal rights. This power is a constitutional power parallel to Article 32, but it cannot negate or reduce the scope and force of the fundamental right guaranteed by Article 32 to directly approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamental rights.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which among the following statements regarding the powers of the High","og_description":"Statement C is incorrect. The power of the High Courts under Article 226 to issue writs is very wide and co-extensive with that of the Supreme Court under Article 32 in matters of fundamental rights, but it also extends to the enforcement of any other legal right, unlike Article 32 which is limited to fundamental rights. However, the High Court's power under Article 226 does *not* derogate (lessen or diminish) the power conferred on the Supreme Court under Article 32(2). Recourse under Article 32 is itself a fundamental right, and it cannot be taken away or diluted by the existence of a parallel power under Article 226. Both powers exist independently, and the aggrieved person can approach either the High Court or the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of fundamental rights, although typically the High Court is approached first. Article 226 grants High Courts extensive writ jurisdiction to enforce fundamental rights and other legal rights. This power is a constitutional power parallel to Article 32, but it cannot negate or reduce the scope and force of the fundamental right guaranteed by Article 32 to directly approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamental rights.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:39:57+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high\/","name":"Which among the following statements regarding the powers of the High","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:39:57+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:39:57+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Statement C is incorrect. The power of the High Courts under Article 226 to issue writs is very wide and co-extensive with that of the Supreme Court under Article 32 in matters of fundamental rights, but it also extends to the enforcement of any other legal right, unlike Article 32 which is limited to fundamental rights. However, the High Court's power under Article 226 does *not* derogate (lessen or diminish) the power conferred on the Supreme Court under Article 32(2). Recourse under Article 32 is itself a fundamental right, and it cannot be taken away or diluted by the existence of a parallel power under Article 226. Both powers exist independently, and the aggrieved person can approach either the High Court or the Supreme Court directly for enforcement of fundamental rights, although typically the High Court is approached first. Article 226 grants High Courts extensive writ jurisdiction to enforce fundamental rights and other legal rights. This power is a constitutional power parallel to Article 32, but it cannot negate or reduce the scope and force of the fundamental right guaranteed by Article 32 to directly approach the Supreme Court for enforcement of fundamental rights.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-among-the-following-statements-regarding-the-powers-of-the-high\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CAPF","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-capf\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which among the following statements regarding the powers of the High"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90899","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90899"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90899\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90899"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90899"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90899"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}