{"id":90779,"date":"2025-06-01T10:36:30","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:36:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=90779"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:36:30","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:36:30","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting in India in the 19th century?<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Art was being produced for the open market.&#8221; option2=&#8221;The artist (Shilpi) became distinct from the artisan (Karigar).&#8221; option3=&#8221;The technique of oil painting was developed.&#8221; option4=&#8221;The distinction between elite and popular art widened.&#8221; correct=&#8221;option3&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC CAPF &#8211; 2022<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-capf-2022.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-capf-2022\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nThe 19th century in India saw significant changes in art, largely due to colonial influence, the decline of traditional patronage, and the introduction of new techniques and markets.<br \/>\nA) Art was being produced for the open market: True. With the decline of royal and aristocratic patronage, artists increasingly catered to a wider market, including British residents and the Indian middle class (e.g., Kalighat paintings in Calcutta).<br \/>\nB) The artist (Shilpi) became distinct from the artisan (Karigar): True, or at least the distinction became more pronounced and redefined. The introduction of Western art education emphasizing &#8216;fine art&#8217; created a hierarchy that separated artists trained in academic styles from traditional craftspeople or artisans.<br \/>\nC) The technique of oil painting was developed: This is incorrect. The technique of oil painting was developed in Europe centuries before the 19th century. In the 19th century, this technique was *introduced* and *popularized* in India, notably by artists like Raja Ravi Varma, but it was not *developed* in India during this period.<br \/>\nD) The distinction between elite and popular art widened: True. The patronage of Western academic art by the elite, contrasting with popular forms like Kalighat paintings catering to a mass urban market, led to a clearer and perhaps wider distinction between elite and popular art.<br \/>\nThe statement that was NOT a feature of the art of painting in India in the 19th century is that oil painting was developed there.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\nThe 19th century marked a transition in Indian art under colonial rule, involving shifts in patronage, introduction of Western techniques (like oil painting and perspective), and the emergence of new art schools and markets.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nNotable art movements and styles of the 19th century include Company School paintings (hybrid style patronized by the British), Kalighat paintings, and the works of artists like Raja Ravi Varma who blended Indian themes with European techniques.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting in India in the 19th century? [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Art was being produced for the open market.&#8221; option2=&#8221;The artist (Shilpi) became distinct from the artisan (Karigar).&#8221; option3=&#8221;The technique of oil painting was developed.&#8221; option4=&#8221;The distinction between elite and popular art widened.&#8221; correct=&#8221;option3&#8243;] This &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/#more-90779\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1085],"tags":[1108,1268,1124],"class_list":["post-90779","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-capf","tag-1108","tag-art-and-culture","tag-modern-history-of-india","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The 19th century in India saw significant changes in art, largely due to colonial influence, the decline of traditional patronage, and the introduction of new techniques and markets. A) Art was being produced for the open market: True. With the decline of royal and aristocratic patronage, artists increasingly catered to a wider market, including British residents and the Indian middle class (e.g., Kalighat paintings in Calcutta). B) The artist (Shilpi) became distinct from the artisan (Karigar): True, or at least the distinction became more pronounced and redefined. The introduction of Western art education emphasizing &#039;fine art&#039; created a hierarchy that separated artists trained in academic styles from traditional craftspeople or artisans. C) The technique of oil painting was developed: This is incorrect. The technique of oil painting was developed in Europe centuries before the 19th century. In the 19th century, this technique was *introduced* and *popularized* in India, notably by artists like Raja Ravi Varma, but it was not *developed* in India during this period. D) The distinction between elite and popular art widened: True. The patronage of Western academic art by the elite, contrasting with popular forms like Kalighat paintings catering to a mass urban market, led to a clearer and perhaps wider distinction between elite and popular art. The statement that was NOT a feature of the art of painting in India in the 19th century is that oil painting was developed there. The 19th century marked a transition in Indian art under colonial rule, involving shifts in patronage, introduction of Western techniques (like oil painting and perspective), and the emergence of new art schools and markets.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The 19th century in India saw significant changes in art, largely due to colonial influence, the decline of traditional patronage, and the introduction of new techniques and markets. A) Art was being produced for the open market: True. With the decline of royal and aristocratic patronage, artists increasingly catered to a wider market, including British residents and the Indian middle class (e.g., Kalighat paintings in Calcutta). B) The artist (Shilpi) became distinct from the artisan (Karigar): True, or at least the distinction became more pronounced and redefined. The introduction of Western art education emphasizing &#039;fine art&#039; created a hierarchy that separated artists trained in academic styles from traditional craftspeople or artisans. C) The technique of oil painting was developed: This is incorrect. The technique of oil painting was developed in Europe centuries before the 19th century. In the 19th century, this technique was *introduced* and *popularized* in India, notably by artists like Raja Ravi Varma, but it was not *developed* in India during this period. D) The distinction between elite and popular art widened: True. The patronage of Western academic art by the elite, contrasting with popular forms like Kalighat paintings catering to a mass urban market, led to a clearer and perhaps wider distinction between elite and popular art. The statement that was NOT a feature of the art of painting in India in the 19th century is that oil painting was developed there. The 19th century marked a transition in Indian art under colonial rule, involving shifts in patronage, introduction of Western techniques (like oil painting and perspective), and the emergence of new art schools and markets.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:36:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting","description":"The 19th century in India saw significant changes in art, largely due to colonial influence, the decline of traditional patronage, and the introduction of new techniques and markets. A) Art was being produced for the open market: True. With the decline of royal and aristocratic patronage, artists increasingly catered to a wider market, including British residents and the Indian middle class (e.g., Kalighat paintings in Calcutta). B) The artist (Shilpi) became distinct from the artisan (Karigar): True, or at least the distinction became more pronounced and redefined. The introduction of Western art education emphasizing 'fine art' created a hierarchy that separated artists trained in academic styles from traditional craftspeople or artisans. C) The technique of oil painting was developed: This is incorrect. The technique of oil painting was developed in Europe centuries before the 19th century. In the 19th century, this technique was *introduced* and *popularized* in India, notably by artists like Raja Ravi Varma, but it was not *developed* in India during this period. D) The distinction between elite and popular art widened: True. The patronage of Western academic art by the elite, contrasting with popular forms like Kalighat paintings catering to a mass urban market, led to a clearer and perhaps wider distinction between elite and popular art. The statement that was NOT a feature of the art of painting in India in the 19th century is that oil painting was developed there. The 19th century marked a transition in Indian art under colonial rule, involving shifts in patronage, introduction of Western techniques (like oil painting and perspective), and the emergence of new art schools and markets.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting","og_description":"The 19th century in India saw significant changes in art, largely due to colonial influence, the decline of traditional patronage, and the introduction of new techniques and markets. A) Art was being produced for the open market: True. With the decline of royal and aristocratic patronage, artists increasingly catered to a wider market, including British residents and the Indian middle class (e.g., Kalighat paintings in Calcutta). B) The artist (Shilpi) became distinct from the artisan (Karigar): True, or at least the distinction became more pronounced and redefined. The introduction of Western art education emphasizing 'fine art' created a hierarchy that separated artists trained in academic styles from traditional craftspeople or artisans. C) The technique of oil painting was developed: This is incorrect. The technique of oil painting was developed in Europe centuries before the 19th century. In the 19th century, this technique was *introduced* and *popularized* in India, notably by artists like Raja Ravi Varma, but it was not *developed* in India during this period. D) The distinction between elite and popular art widened: True. The patronage of Western academic art by the elite, contrasting with popular forms like Kalighat paintings catering to a mass urban market, led to a clearer and perhaps wider distinction between elite and popular art. The statement that was NOT a feature of the art of painting in India in the 19th century is that oil painting was developed there. The 19th century marked a transition in Indian art under colonial rule, involving shifts in patronage, introduction of Western techniques (like oil painting and perspective), and the emergence of new art schools and markets.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:36:30+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/","name":"Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:36:30+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:36:30+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The 19th century in India saw significant changes in art, largely due to colonial influence, the decline of traditional patronage, and the introduction of new techniques and markets. A) Art was being produced for the open market: True. With the decline of royal and aristocratic patronage, artists increasingly catered to a wider market, including British residents and the Indian middle class (e.g., Kalighat paintings in Calcutta). B) The artist (Shilpi) became distinct from the artisan (Karigar): True, or at least the distinction became more pronounced and redefined. The introduction of Western art education emphasizing 'fine art' created a hierarchy that separated artists trained in academic styles from traditional craftspeople or artisans. C) The technique of oil painting was developed: This is incorrect. The technique of oil painting was developed in Europe centuries before the 19th century. In the 19th century, this technique was *introduced* and *popularized* in India, notably by artists like Raja Ravi Varma, but it was not *developed* in India during this period. D) The distinction between elite and popular art widened: True. The patronage of Western academic art by the elite, contrasting with popular forms like Kalighat paintings catering to a mass urban market, led to a clearer and perhaps wider distinction between elite and popular art. The statement that was NOT a feature of the art of painting in India in the 19th century is that oil painting was developed there. The 19th century marked a transition in Indian art under colonial rule, involving shifts in patronage, introduction of Western techniques (like oil painting and perspective), and the emergence of new art schools and markets.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-was-not-a-feature-of-the-art-of-painting\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CAPF","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-capf\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following was `not` a feature of the art of painting"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90779","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90779"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90779\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90779"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90779"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90779"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}