{"id":90325,"date":"2025-06-01T10:26:23","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:26:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=90325"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:26:23","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:26:23","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Con"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Constitution of India pertaining to disqualification of members of the Parliament and State legislatures ?<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;The schedule lays down that elected members may be disqualified on the grounds of defection&#8221; option2=&#8221;Disqualification on ground of defection does not apply in cases of merger with another political party&#8221; option3=&#8221;Cases of dispute are decided by the Speaker or Chairman of the House concerned&#8221; option4=&#8221;The Supreme Court of India is the final arbiter in cases which remain unresolved&#8221; correct=&#8221;option4&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC CAPF &#8211; 2019<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-capf-2019.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-capf-2019\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nThe statement that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter in cases which remain unresolved is not accurate. The decision on disqualification under the 10th Schedule is made by the Speaker (in Lok Sabha) or Chairman (in Rajya Sabha), and this decision is subject to judicial review by the High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Court reviews the decision of the presiding officer; it doesn&#8217;t step in to resolve cases that the Speaker\/Chairman failed to resolve.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\n&#8211; The 10th Schedule provides for disqualification of MPs and MLAs on grounds of defection.<br \/>\n&#8211; Exceptions exist, such as in cases of merger of political parties under specific conditions (e.g., 2\/3rd members agree).<br \/>\n&#8211; The authority to decide on disqualification cases rests with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha\/Legislative Council.<br \/>\n&#8211; The decision of the presiding officer is subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court and High Courts (established in the Kihoto Hollohan case, 1993).<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nThe 10th Schedule was added to the Constitution by the 52nd Amendment Act, 1985. It aims to prevent political defections. The process involves the presiding officer of the House making the decision based on the rules framed under the schedule. While judicial review is available, the court examines the legality\/constitutionality of the presiding officer&#8217;s decision rather than acting as an alternative forum to resolve the defection case itself. The phrase &#8220;cases which remain unresolved&#8221; is problematic as the Speaker\/Chairman is mandated to resolve the cases.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Constitution of India pertaining to disqualification of members of the Parliament and State legislatures ? [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;The schedule lays down that elected members may be disqualified on the grounds of defection&#8221; option2=&#8221;Disqualification on ground of defection does not apply in cases &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Con\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/#more-90325\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Con<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1085],"tags":[1119,1099,1178],"class_list":["post-90325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-capf","tag-1119","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-schedules","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Con<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The statement that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter in cases which remain unresolved is not accurate. The decision on disqualification under the 10th Schedule is made by the Speaker (in Lok Sabha) or Chairman (in Rajya Sabha), and this decision is subject to judicial review by the High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Court reviews the decision of the presiding officer; it doesn&#039;t step in to resolve cases that the Speaker\/Chairman failed to resolve. - The 10th Schedule provides for disqualification of MPs and MLAs on grounds of defection. - Exceptions exist, such as in cases of merger of political parties under specific conditions (e.g., 2\/3rd members agree). - The authority to decide on disqualification cases rests with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha\/Legislative Council. - The decision of the presiding officer is subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court and High Courts (established in the Kihoto Hollohan case, 1993).\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Con\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The statement that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter in cases which remain unresolved is not accurate. The decision on disqualification under the 10th Schedule is made by the Speaker (in Lok Sabha) or Chairman (in Rajya Sabha), and this decision is subject to judicial review by the High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Court reviews the decision of the presiding officer; it doesn&#039;t step in to resolve cases that the Speaker\/Chairman failed to resolve. - The 10th Schedule provides for disqualification of MPs and MLAs on grounds of defection. - Exceptions exist, such as in cases of merger of political parties under specific conditions (e.g., 2\/3rd members agree). - The authority to decide on disqualification cases rests with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha\/Legislative Council. - The decision of the presiding officer is subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court and High Courts (established in the Kihoto Hollohan case, 1993).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:26:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Con","description":"The statement that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter in cases which remain unresolved is not accurate. The decision on disqualification under the 10th Schedule is made by the Speaker (in Lok Sabha) or Chairman (in Rajya Sabha), and this decision is subject to judicial review by the High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Court reviews the decision of the presiding officer; it doesn't step in to resolve cases that the Speaker\/Chairman failed to resolve. - The 10th Schedule provides for disqualification of MPs and MLAs on grounds of defection. - Exceptions exist, such as in cases of merger of political parties under specific conditions (e.g., 2\/3rd members agree). - The authority to decide on disqualification cases rests with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha\/Legislative Council. - The decision of the presiding officer is subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court and High Courts (established in the Kihoto Hollohan case, 1993).","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Con","og_description":"The statement that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter in cases which remain unresolved is not accurate. The decision on disqualification under the 10th Schedule is made by the Speaker (in Lok Sabha) or Chairman (in Rajya Sabha), and this decision is subject to judicial review by the High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Court reviews the decision of the presiding officer; it doesn't step in to resolve cases that the Speaker\/Chairman failed to resolve. - The 10th Schedule provides for disqualification of MPs and MLAs on grounds of defection. - Exceptions exist, such as in cases of merger of political parties under specific conditions (e.g., 2\/3rd members agree). - The authority to decide on disqualification cases rests with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha\/Legislative Council. - The decision of the presiding officer is subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court and High Courts (established in the Kihoto Hollohan case, 1993).","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:26:23+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/","name":"Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Con","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:26:23+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:26:23+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The statement that the Supreme Court is the final arbiter in cases which remain unresolved is not accurate. The decision on disqualification under the 10th Schedule is made by the Speaker (in Lok Sabha) or Chairman (in Rajya Sabha), and this decision is subject to judicial review by the High Courts and the Supreme Court. The Court reviews the decision of the presiding officer; it doesn't step in to resolve cases that the Speaker\/Chairman failed to resolve. - The 10th Schedule provides for disqualification of MPs and MLAs on grounds of defection. - Exceptions exist, such as in cases of merger of political parties under specific conditions (e.g., 2\/3rd members agree). - The authority to decide on disqualification cases rests with the Speaker of the Lok Sabha or the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha\/Legislative Council. - The decision of the presiding officer is subject to judicial review by the Supreme Court and High Courts (established in the Kihoto Hollohan case, 1993).","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-is-not-true-of-the-10th-schedule-of-the-con\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CAPF","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-capf\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following is NOT true of the 10th schedule of the Con"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90325","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90325"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90325\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}