{"id":90268,"date":"2025-06-01T10:24:13","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:24:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=90268"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:24:13","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:24:13","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy o"},"content":{"rendered":"

Which one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy of the Chief Justice of India and the Collegium of Judges in the appointment and transfer of higher judiciary?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala” option2=”S. P. Gupta vs. President of India” option3=”Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India” option4=”S. R. Bommai vs. Union of India” correct=”option2″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CAPF – 2018<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe correct answer is B) S. P. Gupta vs. President of India.
\n<\/section>\n
\nThe issue of the appointment and transfer of judges in the higher judiciary and the roles of the executive and the judiciary in this process has been deliberated in a series of Supreme Court cases known as the ‘Judges Cases’.
\n– The First Judges Case (S. P. Gupta vs. Union of India, 1982) held that the opinion of the Chief Justice of India in the process of appointing judges is merely consultative and the executive has the final say. This judgement is the starting point of the legal discourse on this issue, even though it did not establish judicial primacy.
\n– The Second Judges Case (Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs. Union of India, 1993) overturned the S.P. Gupta verdict and established the Collegium System, giving primacy to the opinion of the Chief Justice of India and a collegium of senior judges in judicial appointments and transfers.
\n– The Third Judges Case (In re: Special Reference 1 of 1998) further clarified the consultation process within the Collegium.
\nGiven the options, S. P. Gupta vs. President of India is the case associated with the debate on the roles in judicial appointments, even though it initially ruled against the primacy of the judiciary. It is considered the first in the series of judgments leading to the establishment of the Collegium system and judicial primacy.
\n<\/section>\n
\nKesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala is famous for the ‘Basic Structure’ doctrine. Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India significantly interpreted Article 21. S. R. Bommai vs. Union of India laid down guidelines regarding the use of Article 356 (President’s Rule).
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Which one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy of the Chief Justice of India and the Collegium of Judges in the appointment and transfer of higher judiciary? [amp_mcq option1=”Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala” option2=”S. P. Gupta vs. President of India” option3=”Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India” option4=”S. R. Bommai vs. Union … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionWhich one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy o<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1085],"tags":[1114,1099,1180],"class_list":["post-90268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-capf","tag-1114","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-the-supreme-court","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nWhich one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy o<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The correct answer is B) S. P. Gupta vs. President of India. The issue of the appointment and transfer of judges in the higher judiciary and the roles of the executive and the judiciary in this process has been deliberated in a series of Supreme Court cases known as the 'Judges Cases'. - The First Judges Case (S. P. Gupta vs. Union of India, 1982) held that the opinion of the Chief Justice of India in the process of appointing judges is merely consultative and the executive has the final say. This judgement is the starting point of the legal discourse on this issue, even though it did not establish judicial primacy. - The Second Judges Case (Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs. Union of India, 1993) overturned the S.P. Gupta verdict and established the Collegium System, giving primacy to the opinion of the Chief Justice of India and a collegium of senior judges in judicial appointments and transfers. - The Third Judges Case (In re: Special Reference 1 of 1998) further clarified the consultation process within the Collegium. Given the options, S. P. Gupta vs. President of India is the case associated with the debate on the roles in judicial appointments, even though it initially ruled against the primacy of the judiciary. It is considered the first in the series of judgments leading to the establishment of the Collegium system and judicial primacy.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy o\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The correct answer is B) S. P. Gupta vs. President of India. The issue of the appointment and transfer of judges in the higher judiciary and the roles of the executive and the judiciary in this process has been deliberated in a series of Supreme Court cases known as the 'Judges Cases'. - The First Judges Case (S. P. Gupta vs. Union of India, 1982) held that the opinion of the Chief Justice of India in the process of appointing judges is merely consultative and the executive has the final say. This judgement is the starting point of the legal discourse on this issue, even though it did not establish judicial primacy. - The Second Judges Case (Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs. Union of India, 1993) overturned the S.P. Gupta verdict and established the Collegium System, giving primacy to the opinion of the Chief Justice of India and a collegium of senior judges in judicial appointments and transfers. - The Third Judges Case (In re: Special Reference 1 of 1998) further clarified the consultation process within the Collegium. Given the options, S. P. Gupta vs. President of India is the case associated with the debate on the roles in judicial appointments, even though it initially ruled against the primacy of the judiciary. It is considered the first in the series of judgments leading to the establishment of the Collegium system and judicial primacy.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:24:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy o","description":"The correct answer is B) S. P. Gupta vs. President of India. The issue of the appointment and transfer of judges in the higher judiciary and the roles of the executive and the judiciary in this process has been deliberated in a series of Supreme Court cases known as the 'Judges Cases'. - The First Judges Case (S. P. Gupta vs. Union of India, 1982) held that the opinion of the Chief Justice of India in the process of appointing judges is merely consultative and the executive has the final say. This judgement is the starting point of the legal discourse on this issue, even though it did not establish judicial primacy. - The Second Judges Case (Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs. Union of India, 1993) overturned the S.P. Gupta verdict and established the Collegium System, giving primacy to the opinion of the Chief Justice of India and a collegium of senior judges in judicial appointments and transfers. - The Third Judges Case (In re: Special Reference 1 of 1998) further clarified the consultation process within the Collegium. Given the options, S. P. Gupta vs. President of India is the case associated with the debate on the roles in judicial appointments, even though it initially ruled against the primacy of the judiciary. It is considered the first in the series of judgments leading to the establishment of the Collegium system and judicial primacy.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy o","og_description":"The correct answer is B) S. P. Gupta vs. President of India. The issue of the appointment and transfer of judges in the higher judiciary and the roles of the executive and the judiciary in this process has been deliberated in a series of Supreme Court cases known as the 'Judges Cases'. - The First Judges Case (S. P. Gupta vs. Union of India, 1982) held that the opinion of the Chief Justice of India in the process of appointing judges is merely consultative and the executive has the final say. This judgement is the starting point of the legal discourse on this issue, even though it did not establish judicial primacy. - The Second Judges Case (Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs. Union of India, 1993) overturned the S.P. Gupta verdict and established the Collegium System, giving primacy to the opinion of the Chief Justice of India and a collegium of senior judges in judicial appointments and transfers. - The Third Judges Case (In re: Special Reference 1 of 1998) further clarified the consultation process within the Collegium. Given the options, S. P. Gupta vs. President of India is the case associated with the debate on the roles in judicial appointments, even though it initially ruled against the primacy of the judiciary. It is considered the first in the series of judgments leading to the establishment of the Collegium system and judicial primacy.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:24:13+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o\/","name":"Which one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy o","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:24:13+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:24:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The correct answer is B) S. P. Gupta vs. President of India. The issue of the appointment and transfer of judges in the higher judiciary and the roles of the executive and the judiciary in this process has been deliberated in a series of Supreme Court cases known as the 'Judges Cases'. - The First Judges Case (S. P. Gupta vs. Union of India, 1982) held that the opinion of the Chief Justice of India in the process of appointing judges is merely consultative and the executive has the final say. This judgement is the starting point of the legal discourse on this issue, even though it did not establish judicial primacy. - The Second Judges Case (Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association vs. Union of India, 1993) overturned the S.P. Gupta verdict and established the Collegium System, giving primacy to the opinion of the Chief Justice of India and a collegium of senior judges in judicial appointments and transfers. - The Third Judges Case (In re: Special Reference 1 of 1998) further clarified the consultation process within the Collegium. Given the options, S. P. Gupta vs. President of India is the case associated with the debate on the roles in judicial appointments, even though it initially ruled against the primacy of the judiciary. It is considered the first in the series of judgments leading to the establishment of the Collegium system and judicial primacy.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-judgements-is-associated-with-the-primacy-o\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CAPF","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-capf\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following judgements is associated with the primacy o"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90268\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}