{"id":90119,"date":"2025-06-01T10:21:15","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:21:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=90119"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:21:15","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:21:15","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NO"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NOT correct ?<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;The British presence inhibited indigenous capitalism&#8221; option2=&#8221;Laissez-faire actively promoted indigenous capitalism&#8221; option3=&#8221;The &#8216;white collective monopoly&#8217; came earliest and remained most pronounced in Eastern India&#8221; option4=&#8221;The Bombay hinterland was difficult to penetrate before the construction of railways&#8221; correct=&#8221;option2&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC CAPF &#8211; 2017<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-capf-2017.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-capf-2017\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nStatement B is NOT correct. While laissez-faire is theoretically minimal state intervention, in the context of colonial India, British economic policies were *not* truly laissez-faire in a way that equally benefited indigenous capitalism. The state actively intervened through policies regarding trade, tariffs, railways, and currency to favor British capital and goods, often hindering the growth of Indian industries and enterprise.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\nColonial economic policy in India was characterized by a system designed to serve the interests of Britain, transforming India into a supplier of raw materials and a market for British manufactured goods. This often involved state intervention that created an unequal playing field disadvantageous to indigenous capital.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nStatement A is correct; British policies led to deindustrialization and inhibited indigenous capital accumulation. Statement C is correct; the British agency houses established early dominance in Eastern India (Bengal) which became the center of colonial administration and trade. Statement D is correct; infrastructure like railways was built primarily to facilitate the movement of goods for colonial exploitation, making the interior accessible to ports like Bombay.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NOT correct ? [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;The British presence inhibited indigenous capitalism&#8221; option2=&#8221;Laissez-faire actively promoted indigenous capitalism&#8221; option3=&#8221;The &#8216;white collective monopoly&#8217; came earliest and remained most pronounced in Eastern India&#8221; option4=&#8221;The Bombay hinterland was difficult to penetrate before the construction of railways&#8221; correct=&#8221;option2&#8243;] This question was &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NO\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/#more-90119\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NO<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1085],"tags":[1101,1264,1124],"class_list":["post-90119","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-capf","tag-1101","tag-economic-impact-of-british-rule-on-india","tag-modern-history-of-india","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NO<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Statement B is NOT correct. While laissez-faire is theoretically minimal state intervention, in the context of colonial India, British economic policies were *not* truly laissez-faire in a way that equally benefited indigenous capitalism. The state actively intervened through policies regarding trade, tariffs, railways, and currency to favor British capital and goods, often hindering the growth of Indian industries and enterprise. Colonial economic policy in India was characterized by a system designed to serve the interests of Britain, transforming India into a supplier of raw materials and a market for British manufactured goods. This often involved state intervention that created an unequal playing field disadvantageous to indigenous capital.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Statement B is NOT correct. While laissez-faire is theoretically minimal state intervention, in the context of colonial India, British economic policies were *not* truly laissez-faire in a way that equally benefited indigenous capitalism. The state actively intervened through policies regarding trade, tariffs, railways, and currency to favor British capital and goods, often hindering the growth of Indian industries and enterprise. Colonial economic policy in India was characterized by a system designed to serve the interests of Britain, transforming India into a supplier of raw materials and a market for British manufactured goods. This often involved state intervention that created an unequal playing field disadvantageous to indigenous capital.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:21:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NO","description":"Statement B is NOT correct. While laissez-faire is theoretically minimal state intervention, in the context of colonial India, British economic policies were *not* truly laissez-faire in a way that equally benefited indigenous capitalism. The state actively intervened through policies regarding trade, tariffs, railways, and currency to favor British capital and goods, often hindering the growth of Indian industries and enterprise. Colonial economic policy in India was characterized by a system designed to serve the interests of Britain, transforming India into a supplier of raw materials and a market for British manufactured goods. This often involved state intervention that created an unequal playing field disadvantageous to indigenous capital.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NO","og_description":"Statement B is NOT correct. While laissez-faire is theoretically minimal state intervention, in the context of colonial India, British economic policies were *not* truly laissez-faire in a way that equally benefited indigenous capitalism. The state actively intervened through policies regarding trade, tariffs, railways, and currency to favor British capital and goods, often hindering the growth of Indian industries and enterprise. Colonial economic policy in India was characterized by a system designed to serve the interests of Britain, transforming India into a supplier of raw materials and a market for British manufactured goods. This often involved state intervention that created an unequal playing field disadvantageous to indigenous capital.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:21:15+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/","name":"Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NO","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:21:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:21:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Statement B is NOT correct. While laissez-faire is theoretically minimal state intervention, in the context of colonial India, British economic policies were *not* truly laissez-faire in a way that equally benefited indigenous capitalism. The state actively intervened through policies regarding trade, tariffs, railways, and currency to favor British capital and goods, often hindering the growth of Indian industries and enterprise. Colonial economic policy in India was characterized by a system designed to serve the interests of Britain, transforming India into a supplier of raw materials and a market for British manufactured goods. This often involved state intervention that created an unequal playing field disadvantageous to indigenous capital.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-the-colonial-economy-is-no\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CAPF","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-capf\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following statements about the Colonial economy is NO"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90119","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=90119"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/90119\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=90119"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=90119"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=90119"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}