{"id":89850,"date":"2025-06-01T10:14:54","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:14:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=89850"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:14:54","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:14:54","slug":"the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case\/","title":{"rendered":"The locus standi rule to move the court was liberalized by the case"},"content":{"rendered":"

The locus standi rule to move the court was liberalized by the case of:<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”S.R. Bommai v. Union of India” option2=”Minerva Mills v. Union of India” option3=”S.P. Gupta v. Union of India” option4=”Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CAPF – 2015<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe locus standi rule, which requires a party to have a direct and substantial interest in the outcome of a case to be able to file a suit, was significantly liberalized in India by the Supreme Court in the case of S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981), also known as the Judges’ Transfer case.
\n<\/section>\n
\nThis case is considered a landmark in the development of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India, allowing any person acting bona fide and having sufficient interest to approach the court for judicial redress in cases where legal injury is caused to a person or class of persons who, by reason of their poverty, disability, or socially or economically disadvantaged position, cannot approach the court for relief.
\n<\/section>\n
\nOther mentioned cases are also significant: S.R. Bommai case (1994) related to Article 356 (President’s Rule); Minerva Mills case (1980) related to the basic structure doctrine and validity of constitutional amendments; Kesavananda Bharati case (1973) established the basic structure doctrine of the Constitution.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The locus standi rule to move the court was liberalized by the case of: [amp_mcq option1=”S.R. Bommai v. Union of India” option2=”Minerva Mills v. Union of India” option3=”S.P. Gupta v. Union of India” option4=”Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala” correct=”option3″] This question was previously asked in UPSC CAPF – 2015 Download PDFAttempt Online The locus … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionThe locus standi rule to move the court was liberalized by the case<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1085],"tags":[1443,1099,1180],"class_list":["post-89850","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-capf","tag-1443","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","tag-the-supreme-court","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nThe locus standi rule to move the court was liberalized by the case<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The locus standi rule, which requires a party to have a direct and substantial interest in the outcome of a case to be able to file a suit, was significantly liberalized in India by the Supreme Court in the case of S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981), also known as the Judges' Transfer case. This case is considered a landmark in the development of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India, allowing any person acting bona fide and having sufficient interest to approach the court for judicial redress in cases where legal injury is caused to a person or class of persons who, by reason of their poverty, disability, or socially or economically disadvantaged position, cannot approach the court for relief.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The locus standi rule to move the court was liberalized by the case\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The locus standi rule, which requires a party to have a direct and substantial interest in the outcome of a case to be able to file a suit, was significantly liberalized in India by the Supreme Court in the case of S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981), also known as the Judges' Transfer case. This case is considered a landmark in the development of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India, allowing any person acting bona fide and having sufficient interest to approach the court for judicial redress in cases where legal injury is caused to a person or class of persons who, by reason of their poverty, disability, or socially or economically disadvantaged position, cannot approach the court for relief.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:14:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The locus standi rule to move the court was liberalized by the case","description":"The locus standi rule, which requires a party to have a direct and substantial interest in the outcome of a case to be able to file a suit, was significantly liberalized in India by the Supreme Court in the case of S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981), also known as the Judges' Transfer case. This case is considered a landmark in the development of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India, allowing any person acting bona fide and having sufficient interest to approach the court for judicial redress in cases where legal injury is caused to a person or class of persons who, by reason of their poverty, disability, or socially or economically disadvantaged position, cannot approach the court for relief.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The locus standi rule to move the court was liberalized by the case","og_description":"The locus standi rule, which requires a party to have a direct and substantial interest in the outcome of a case to be able to file a suit, was significantly liberalized in India by the Supreme Court in the case of S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981), also known as the Judges' Transfer case. This case is considered a landmark in the development of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India, allowing any person acting bona fide and having sufficient interest to approach the court for judicial redress in cases where legal injury is caused to a person or class of persons who, by reason of their poverty, disability, or socially or economically disadvantaged position, cannot approach the court for relief.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:14:54+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case\/","name":"The locus standi rule to move the court was liberalized by the case","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:14:54+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:14:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The locus standi rule, which requires a party to have a direct and substantial interest in the outcome of a case to be able to file a suit, was significantly liberalized in India by the Supreme Court in the case of S.P. Gupta v. Union of India (1981), also known as the Judges' Transfer case. This case is considered a landmark in the development of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in India, allowing any person acting bona fide and having sufficient interest to approach the court for judicial redress in cases where legal injury is caused to a person or class of persons who, by reason of their poverty, disability, or socially or economically disadvantaged position, cannot approach the court for relief.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-locus-standi-rule-to-move-the-court-was-liberalized-by-the-case\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CAPF","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-capf\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The locus standi rule to move the court was liberalized by the case"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89850","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89850"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89850\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89850"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89850"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89850"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}