{"id":89764,"date":"2025-06-01T10:12:15","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:12:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=89764"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:12:15","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:12:15","slug":"the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because\/","title":{"rendered":"The Permanent Settlement was rarely extended to other regions because"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Permanent Settlement was rarely extended to other regions because :<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”increase in agricultural prices after 1810 increased the value of the harvest, while the Permanent Settlement disallowed an increase in the State\u2019s share” option2=”the economic theories of Ricardo influenced the policy makers” option3=”the State found it expedient to settle directly with the ryot” option4=”all of the above” correct=”option4″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CAPF – 2014<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nAll the provided statements are valid reasons why the Permanent Settlement was not widely extended to other regions of British India after its implementation in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. The fixed revenue demand (Statement A) became disadvantageous for the state when agricultural prices and land value increased. The evolving economic theories, particularly those influenced by Ricardo (Statement B), suggested that the state should capture the increase in land value. Consequently, the British administration found it more financially beneficial and expedient to adopt alternative land revenue systems like the Ryotwari and Mahalwari systems in other territories, which allowed for periodic revisions of revenue settlement directly with the cultivators or village communities (Statement C).
\n<\/section>\n
\nThe failure to extend the Permanent Settlement was primarily due to the financial loss incurred by the state from fixing revenue permanently in the face of rising agricultural prices and the influence of new economic theories advocating for the state to share in increased land value.
\n<\/section>\n
\nThe Permanent Settlement created a class of loyal zamindars but deprived the state of a share in the increasing wealth generated from agriculture. The Ryotwari and Mahalwari systems, implemented in large parts of South and North India respectively, allowed the state to periodically reassess land revenue, ensuring that it could benefit from increases in agricultural productivity and prices.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Permanent Settlement was rarely extended to other regions because : [amp_mcq option1=”increase in agricultural prices after 1810 increased the value of the harvest, while the Permanent Settlement disallowed an increase in the State\u2019s share” option2=”the economic theories of Ricardo influenced the policy makers” option3=”the State found it expedient to settle directly with the ryot” … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionThe Permanent Settlement was rarely extended to other regions because<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1085],"tags":[1468,1264,1124],"class_list":["post-89764","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-capf","tag-1468","tag-economic-impact-of-british-rule-on-india","tag-modern-history-of-india","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Permanent Settlement was rarely extended to other regions because<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"All the provided statements are valid reasons why the Permanent Settlement was not widely extended to other regions of British India after its implementation in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. The fixed revenue demand (Statement A) became disadvantageous for the state when agricultural prices and land value increased. The evolving economic theories, particularly those influenced by Ricardo (Statement B), suggested that the state should capture the increase in land value. Consequently, the British administration found it more financially beneficial and expedient to adopt alternative land revenue systems like the Ryotwari and Mahalwari systems in other territories, which allowed for periodic revisions of revenue settlement directly with the cultivators or village communities (Statement C). The failure to extend the Permanent Settlement was primarily due to the financial loss incurred by the state from fixing revenue permanently in the face of rising agricultural prices and the influence of new economic theories advocating for the state to share in increased land value.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Permanent Settlement was rarely extended to other regions because\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"All the provided statements are valid reasons why the Permanent Settlement was not widely extended to other regions of British India after its implementation in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. The fixed revenue demand (Statement A) became disadvantageous for the state when agricultural prices and land value increased. The evolving economic theories, particularly those influenced by Ricardo (Statement B), suggested that the state should capture the increase in land value. Consequently, the British administration found it more financially beneficial and expedient to adopt alternative land revenue systems like the Ryotwari and Mahalwari systems in other territories, which allowed for periodic revisions of revenue settlement directly with the cultivators or village communities (Statement C). The failure to extend the Permanent Settlement was primarily due to the financial loss incurred by the state from fixing revenue permanently in the face of rising agricultural prices and the influence of new economic theories advocating for the state to share in increased land value.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:12:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Permanent Settlement was rarely extended to other regions because","description":"All the provided statements are valid reasons why the Permanent Settlement was not widely extended to other regions of British India after its implementation in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. The fixed revenue demand (Statement A) became disadvantageous for the state when agricultural prices and land value increased. The evolving economic theories, particularly those influenced by Ricardo (Statement B), suggested that the state should capture the increase in land value. Consequently, the British administration found it more financially beneficial and expedient to adopt alternative land revenue systems like the Ryotwari and Mahalwari systems in other territories, which allowed for periodic revisions of revenue settlement directly with the cultivators or village communities (Statement C). The failure to extend the Permanent Settlement was primarily due to the financial loss incurred by the state from fixing revenue permanently in the face of rising agricultural prices and the influence of new economic theories advocating for the state to share in increased land value.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Permanent Settlement was rarely extended to other regions because","og_description":"All the provided statements are valid reasons why the Permanent Settlement was not widely extended to other regions of British India after its implementation in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. The fixed revenue demand (Statement A) became disadvantageous for the state when agricultural prices and land value increased. The evolving economic theories, particularly those influenced by Ricardo (Statement B), suggested that the state should capture the increase in land value. Consequently, the British administration found it more financially beneficial and expedient to adopt alternative land revenue systems like the Ryotwari and Mahalwari systems in other territories, which allowed for periodic revisions of revenue settlement directly with the cultivators or village communities (Statement C). The failure to extend the Permanent Settlement was primarily due to the financial loss incurred by the state from fixing revenue permanently in the face of rising agricultural prices and the influence of new economic theories advocating for the state to share in increased land value.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:12:15+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because\/","name":"The Permanent Settlement was rarely extended to other regions because","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:12:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:12:15+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"All the provided statements are valid reasons why the Permanent Settlement was not widely extended to other regions of British India after its implementation in Bengal, Bihar, and Orissa. The fixed revenue demand (Statement A) became disadvantageous for the state when agricultural prices and land value increased. The evolving economic theories, particularly those influenced by Ricardo (Statement B), suggested that the state should capture the increase in land value. Consequently, the British administration found it more financially beneficial and expedient to adopt alternative land revenue systems like the Ryotwari and Mahalwari systems in other territories, which allowed for periodic revisions of revenue settlement directly with the cultivators or village communities (Statement C). The failure to extend the Permanent Settlement was primarily due to the financial loss incurred by the state from fixing revenue permanently in the face of rising agricultural prices and the influence of new economic theories advocating for the state to share in increased land value.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-permanent-settlement-was-rarely-extended-to-other-regions-because\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CAPF","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-capf\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The Permanent Settlement was rarely extended to other regions because"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89764","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89764"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89764\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89764"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89764"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89764"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}