{"id":89745,"date":"2025-06-01T10:11:54","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:11:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=89745"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:11:54","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:11:54","slug":"the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between\/","title":{"rendered":"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between :"},"content":{"rendered":"

The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between :<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”religious rights v. civil rights” option2=”national rights v. minority rights” option3=”gender rights v. equal rights” option4=”civil and political rights v. economic, social and cultural rights” correct=”option4″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CAPF – 2014<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe major cleavage in global human rights discourse has historically been the debate and differing emphasis placed on civil and political rights versus economic, social, and cultural rights. Civil and political rights (such as the right to life, liberty, freedom of speech, right to vote) were often prioritized by Western liberal democracies, while economic, social, and cultural rights (such as the right to work, education, healthcare, adequate standard of living) were often championed by socialist states and developing countries. This led to debates about their universality, indivisibility, and priorities, forming a significant divide in the human rights discourse, particularly evident during the Cold War era.
\n<\/section>\n
\nCivil and political rights (First Generation Rights) include freedoms and participation in government.
\nEconomic, social, and cultural rights (Second Generation Rights) relate to social and economic security and well-being.
\nThe perceived tension and differing priorities between these two sets of rights have been a major point of contention.
\n<\/section>\n
\nInternational human rights law, as reflected in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) and the two major Covenants (ICCPR and ICESCR), aims to treat all rights as universal, indivisible, interdependent, and interrelated. However, the historical and ongoing debates about their implementation and prioritization highlight the cleavage.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between : [amp_mcq option1=”religious rights v. civil rights” option2=”national rights v. minority rights” option3=”gender rights v. equal rights” option4=”civil and political rights v. economic, social and cultural rights” correct=”option4″] This question was previously asked in UPSC CAPF – 2014 Download PDFAttempt Online The major cleavage … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionThe major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between :<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1085],"tags":[1468,1185,1184],"class_list":["post-89745","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-capf","tag-1468","tag-human-development","tag-social-development","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nThe major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between :<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has historically been the debate and differing emphasis placed on civil and political rights versus economic, social, and cultural rights. Civil and political rights (such as the right to life, liberty, freedom of speech, right to vote) were often prioritized by Western liberal democracies, while economic, social, and cultural rights (such as the right to work, education, healthcare, adequate standard of living) were often championed by socialist states and developing countries. This led to debates about their universality, indivisibility, and priorities, forming a significant divide in the human rights discourse, particularly evident during the Cold War era. Civil and political rights (First Generation Rights) include freedoms and participation in government. Economic, social, and cultural rights (Second Generation Rights) relate to social and economic security and well-being. The perceived tension and differing priorities between these two sets of rights have been a major point of contention.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between :\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has historically been the debate and differing emphasis placed on civil and political rights versus economic, social, and cultural rights. Civil and political rights (such as the right to life, liberty, freedom of speech, right to vote) were often prioritized by Western liberal democracies, while economic, social, and cultural rights (such as the right to work, education, healthcare, adequate standard of living) were often championed by socialist states and developing countries. This led to debates about their universality, indivisibility, and priorities, forming a significant divide in the human rights discourse, particularly evident during the Cold War era. Civil and political rights (First Generation Rights) include freedoms and participation in government. Economic, social, and cultural rights (Second Generation Rights) relate to social and economic security and well-being. The perceived tension and differing priorities between these two sets of rights have been a major point of contention.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:11:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between :","description":"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has historically been the debate and differing emphasis placed on civil and political rights versus economic, social, and cultural rights. Civil and political rights (such as the right to life, liberty, freedom of speech, right to vote) were often prioritized by Western liberal democracies, while economic, social, and cultural rights (such as the right to work, education, healthcare, adequate standard of living) were often championed by socialist states and developing countries. This led to debates about their universality, indivisibility, and priorities, forming a significant divide in the human rights discourse, particularly evident during the Cold War era. Civil and political rights (First Generation Rights) include freedoms and participation in government. Economic, social, and cultural rights (Second Generation Rights) relate to social and economic security and well-being. The perceived tension and differing priorities between these two sets of rights have been a major point of contention.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between :","og_description":"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has historically been the debate and differing emphasis placed on civil and political rights versus economic, social, and cultural rights. Civil and political rights (such as the right to life, liberty, freedom of speech, right to vote) were often prioritized by Western liberal democracies, while economic, social, and cultural rights (such as the right to work, education, healthcare, adequate standard of living) were often championed by socialist states and developing countries. This led to debates about their universality, indivisibility, and priorities, forming a significant divide in the human rights discourse, particularly evident during the Cold War era. Civil and political rights (First Generation Rights) include freedoms and participation in government. Economic, social, and cultural rights (Second Generation Rights) relate to social and economic security and well-being. The perceived tension and differing priorities between these two sets of rights have been a major point of contention.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:11:54+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between\/","name":"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between :","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:11:54+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:11:54+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has historically been the debate and differing emphasis placed on civil and political rights versus economic, social, and cultural rights. Civil and political rights (such as the right to life, liberty, freedom of speech, right to vote) were often prioritized by Western liberal democracies, while economic, social, and cultural rights (such as the right to work, education, healthcare, adequate standard of living) were often championed by socialist states and developing countries. This led to debates about their universality, indivisibility, and priorities, forming a significant divide in the human rights discourse, particularly evident during the Cold War era. Civil and political rights (First Generation Rights) include freedoms and participation in government. Economic, social, and cultural rights (Second Generation Rights) relate to social and economic security and well-being. The perceived tension and differing priorities between these two sets of rights have been a major point of contention.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-major-cleavage-in-global-human-rights-discourse-has-been-between\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CAPF","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-capf\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The major cleavage in global human rights discourse has been between :"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89745","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89745"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89745\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89745"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89745"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89745"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}