{"id":89471,"date":"2025-06-01T10:05:16","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:05:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=89471"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:05:16","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:05:16","slug":"the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin\/","title":{"rendered":"The Indian military occupies a border village believed to be harbourin"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Indian military occupies a border village believed to be harbouring insurgents and asked the residents to vacate their houses in a night operation. Which one among the following statements is the correct interpretation of this incident?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”India is a democracy and no citizen can be asked to leave their home without a warrant. Hence, this act constitutes a human rights violation.” option2=”The military operation does not constitute a human rights violation as it is operating in an insurgency infested area.” option3=”Under the Indian Constitution, every individual is entitled to basic fundamental rights and hence the military cannot ask anyone to leave their house on mere suspicion of supporting insurgents. Hence, this act by the military constitutes a human rights violation.” option4=”Just mere suspicion of supporting insurgency cannot be used as a pretext to occupy a village. Hence, the military action constitutes a human rights violation.” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CAPF – 2011<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe correct interpretation is C. Forcing residents to vacate their homes on mere suspicion of supporting insurgents without due process infringes upon their fundamental rights guaranteed under the Indian Constitution and can be considered a human rights violation.
\n<\/section>\n
\n– The Indian Constitution guarantees fundamental rights, including the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21) and protections against arbitrary action.
\n– Asking citizens to vacate their homes, even in insurgency areas, based on mere suspicion and without proper legal procedure or compensation, is a significant restriction on their rights.
\n– While security forces operate under difficult conditions in insurgency areas and may have specific legal powers (like under AFSPA, if applicable), these powers are still subject to judicial review and are expected to be exercised reasonably and with minimum infringement on fundamental rights.
\n– Violations of fundamental rights by state actors, including the military, constitute human rights violations.
\n<\/section>\n
\nHuman rights principles require that any restriction on rights must be necessary, proportionate, and in accordance with the law. Actions based on “mere suspicion” often fail these tests, especially when they involve displacing people from their homes. The judiciary in India has often intervened to protect citizens’ rights against excesses by security forces, emphasizing the importance of accountability and due process even in disturbed areas.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Indian military occupies a border village believed to be harbouring insurgents and asked the residents to vacate their houses in a night operation. Which one among the following statements is the correct interpretation of this incident? [amp_mcq option1=”India is a democracy and no citizen can be asked to leave their home without a warrant. … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionThe Indian military occupies a border village believed to be harbourin<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1085],"tags":[1465,1186,1099],"class_list":["post-89471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-capf","tag-1465","tag-fundamental-rights","tag-indian-polity-and-governance","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Indian military occupies a border village believed to be harbourin<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The correct interpretation is C. Forcing residents to vacate their homes on mere suspicion of supporting insurgents without due process infringes upon their fundamental rights guaranteed under the Indian Constitution and can be considered a human rights violation. - The Indian Constitution guarantees fundamental rights, including the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21) and protections against arbitrary action. - Asking citizens to vacate their homes, even in insurgency areas, based on mere suspicion and without proper legal procedure or compensation, is a significant restriction on their rights. - While security forces operate under difficult conditions in insurgency areas and may have specific legal powers (like under AFSPA, if applicable), these powers are still subject to judicial review and are expected to be exercised reasonably and with minimum infringement on fundamental rights. - Violations of fundamental rights by state actors, including the military, constitute human rights violations.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Indian military occupies a border village believed to be harbourin\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The correct interpretation is C. Forcing residents to vacate their homes on mere suspicion of supporting insurgents without due process infringes upon their fundamental rights guaranteed under the Indian Constitution and can be considered a human rights violation. - The Indian Constitution guarantees fundamental rights, including the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21) and protections against arbitrary action. - Asking citizens to vacate their homes, even in insurgency areas, based on mere suspicion and without proper legal procedure or compensation, is a significant restriction on their rights. - While security forces operate under difficult conditions in insurgency areas and may have specific legal powers (like under AFSPA, if applicable), these powers are still subject to judicial review and are expected to be exercised reasonably and with minimum infringement on fundamental rights. - Violations of fundamental rights by state actors, including the military, constitute human rights violations.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:05:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Indian military occupies a border village believed to be harbourin","description":"The correct interpretation is C. Forcing residents to vacate their homes on mere suspicion of supporting insurgents without due process infringes upon their fundamental rights guaranteed under the Indian Constitution and can be considered a human rights violation. - The Indian Constitution guarantees fundamental rights, including the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21) and protections against arbitrary action. - Asking citizens to vacate their homes, even in insurgency areas, based on mere suspicion and without proper legal procedure or compensation, is a significant restriction on their rights. - While security forces operate under difficult conditions in insurgency areas and may have specific legal powers (like under AFSPA, if applicable), these powers are still subject to judicial review and are expected to be exercised reasonably and with minimum infringement on fundamental rights. - Violations of fundamental rights by state actors, including the military, constitute human rights violations.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Indian military occupies a border village believed to be harbourin","og_description":"The correct interpretation is C. Forcing residents to vacate their homes on mere suspicion of supporting insurgents without due process infringes upon their fundamental rights guaranteed under the Indian Constitution and can be considered a human rights violation. - The Indian Constitution guarantees fundamental rights, including the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21) and protections against arbitrary action. - Asking citizens to vacate their homes, even in insurgency areas, based on mere suspicion and without proper legal procedure or compensation, is a significant restriction on their rights. - While security forces operate under difficult conditions in insurgency areas and may have specific legal powers (like under AFSPA, if applicable), these powers are still subject to judicial review and are expected to be exercised reasonably and with minimum infringement on fundamental rights. - Violations of fundamental rights by state actors, including the military, constitute human rights violations.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:05:16+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin\/","name":"The Indian military occupies a border village believed to be harbourin","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:05:16+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:05:16+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The correct interpretation is C. Forcing residents to vacate their homes on mere suspicion of supporting insurgents without due process infringes upon their fundamental rights guaranteed under the Indian Constitution and can be considered a human rights violation. - The Indian Constitution guarantees fundamental rights, including the right to life and personal liberty (Article 21) and protections against arbitrary action. - Asking citizens to vacate their homes, even in insurgency areas, based on mere suspicion and without proper legal procedure or compensation, is a significant restriction on their rights. - While security forces operate under difficult conditions in insurgency areas and may have specific legal powers (like under AFSPA, if applicable), these powers are still subject to judicial review and are expected to be exercised reasonably and with minimum infringement on fundamental rights. - Violations of fundamental rights by state actors, including the military, constitute human rights violations.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-indian-military-occupies-a-border-village-believed-to-be-harbourin\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CAPF","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-capf\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The Indian military occupies a border village believed to be harbourin"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89471"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89471\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}