{"id":89318,"date":"2025-06-01T10:02:13","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:02:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=89318"},"modified":"2025-06-01T10:02:13","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T10:02:13","slug":"which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one among the following is not correct about the Subsidiary Alli"},"content":{"rendered":"

Which one among the following is not correct about the Subsidiary Alliance ?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”It was formulated by Wellesley” option2=”British army was posted in the subsidiary state” option3=”It did not recognize an adopted heir to a subsidiary state” option4=”A British Resident was posted in the subsidiary state” correct=”option3″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CAPF – 2010<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nOption C is incorrect about the Subsidiary Alliance. The Subsidiary Alliance system, formulated by Lord Wellesley, did not deal with the issue of succession or the recognition of adopted heirs. This was a feature of the Doctrine of Lapse, introduced later by Lord Dalhousie, which stated that if a ruler of a protected state died without a natural heir, the state would be annexed by the British, and adopted heirs were generally not recognized. The Subsidiary Alliance focused on bringing Indian states under British control regarding foreign policy, defence, and internal administration via a Resident.
\n<\/section>\n
\nThe Subsidiary Alliance system required Indian states to accept a permanent British force within their territory, pay for its maintenance, surrender their external relations to the British, and accept a British Resident at their court. In return, the British promised protection against external enemies.
\n<\/section>\n
\nLord Wellesley used the Subsidiary Alliance system extensively to expand British influence in India. Key states that accepted the alliance included Hyderabad (1798), Mysore (1799), Oudh (1801), and the Maratha Peshwa (1802). The system effectively stripped the Indian rulers of their sovereignty and brought them under British control.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Which one among the following is not correct about the Subsidiary Alliance ? [amp_mcq option1=”It was formulated by Wellesley” option2=”British army was posted in the subsidiary state” option3=”It did not recognize an adopted heir to a subsidiary state” option4=”A British Resident was posted in the subsidiary state” correct=”option3″] This question was previously asked in UPSC … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionWhich one among the following is not correct about the Subsidiary Alli<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1085],"tags":[1464,1306,1124],"class_list":["post-89318","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-capf","tag-1464","tag-indian-princely-states","tag-modern-history-of-india","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nWhich one among the following is not correct about the Subsidiary Alli<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Option C is incorrect about the Subsidiary Alliance. The Subsidiary Alliance system, formulated by Lord Wellesley, did not deal with the issue of succession or the recognition of adopted heirs. This was a feature of the Doctrine of Lapse, introduced later by Lord Dalhousie, which stated that if a ruler of a protected state died without a natural heir, the state would be annexed by the British, and adopted heirs were generally not recognized. The Subsidiary Alliance focused on bringing Indian states under British control regarding foreign policy, defence, and internal administration via a Resident. The Subsidiary Alliance system required Indian states to accept a permanent British force within their territory, pay for its maintenance, surrender their external relations to the British, and accept a British Resident at their court. In return, the British promised protection against external enemies.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one among the following is not correct about the Subsidiary Alli\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Option C is incorrect about the Subsidiary Alliance. The Subsidiary Alliance system, formulated by Lord Wellesley, did not deal with the issue of succession or the recognition of adopted heirs. This was a feature of the Doctrine of Lapse, introduced later by Lord Dalhousie, which stated that if a ruler of a protected state died without a natural heir, the state would be annexed by the British, and adopted heirs were generally not recognized. The Subsidiary Alliance focused on bringing Indian states under British control regarding foreign policy, defence, and internal administration via a Resident. The Subsidiary Alliance system required Indian states to accept a permanent British force within their territory, pay for its maintenance, surrender their external relations to the British, and accept a British Resident at their court. In return, the British promised protection against external enemies.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T10:02:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one among the following is not correct about the Subsidiary Alli","description":"Option C is incorrect about the Subsidiary Alliance. The Subsidiary Alliance system, formulated by Lord Wellesley, did not deal with the issue of succession or the recognition of adopted heirs. This was a feature of the Doctrine of Lapse, introduced later by Lord Dalhousie, which stated that if a ruler of a protected state died without a natural heir, the state would be annexed by the British, and adopted heirs were generally not recognized. The Subsidiary Alliance focused on bringing Indian states under British control regarding foreign policy, defence, and internal administration via a Resident. The Subsidiary Alliance system required Indian states to accept a permanent British force within their territory, pay for its maintenance, surrender their external relations to the British, and accept a British Resident at their court. In return, the British promised protection against external enemies.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one among the following is not correct about the Subsidiary Alli","og_description":"Option C is incorrect about the Subsidiary Alliance. The Subsidiary Alliance system, formulated by Lord Wellesley, did not deal with the issue of succession or the recognition of adopted heirs. This was a feature of the Doctrine of Lapse, introduced later by Lord Dalhousie, which stated that if a ruler of a protected state died without a natural heir, the state would be annexed by the British, and adopted heirs were generally not recognized. The Subsidiary Alliance focused on bringing Indian states under British control regarding foreign policy, defence, and internal administration via a Resident. The Subsidiary Alliance system required Indian states to accept a permanent British force within their territory, pay for its maintenance, surrender their external relations to the British, and accept a British Resident at their court. In return, the British promised protection against external enemies.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T10:02:13+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli\/","name":"Which one among the following is not correct about the Subsidiary Alli","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T10:02:13+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T10:02:13+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Option C is incorrect about the Subsidiary Alliance. The Subsidiary Alliance system, formulated by Lord Wellesley, did not deal with the issue of succession or the recognition of adopted heirs. This was a feature of the Doctrine of Lapse, introduced later by Lord Dalhousie, which stated that if a ruler of a protected state died without a natural heir, the state would be annexed by the British, and adopted heirs were generally not recognized. The Subsidiary Alliance focused on bringing Indian states under British control regarding foreign policy, defence, and internal administration via a Resident. The Subsidiary Alliance system required Indian states to accept a permanent British force within their territory, pay for its maintenance, surrender their external relations to the British, and accept a British Resident at their court. In return, the British promised protection against external enemies.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-among-the-following-is-not-correct-about-the-subsidiary-alli\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CAPF","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-capf\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one among the following is not correct about the Subsidiary Alli"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89318","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=89318"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/89318\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=89318"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=89318"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=89318"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}