{"id":88687,"date":"2025-06-01T07:18:19","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T07:18:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=88687"},"modified":"2025-06-01T07:18:19","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T07:18:19","slug":"what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/","title":{"rendered":"What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in B"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in Bengal ?<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;The zamindars invested capital and enterprise to improve agriculture along lines of British yeoman farmers&#8221; option2=&#8221;A group of rich peasants known as jotedars succeeded in consolidating their position in the villages&#8221; option3=&#8221;The ryots prospered as a result of fixed revenue levy imposed on them&#8221; option4=&#8221;The system of Collectorate introduced by the Company for exercising supervisory control on zamindars failed to take off&#8221; correct=&#8221;option2&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC NDA-2 &#8211; 2020<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-nda-2-2020.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-nda-2-2020\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nThe Permanent Settlement (1793) fixed the land revenue in Bengal, granting proprietary rights to the zamindars. This system, however, often led to absenteeism among zamindars and the growth of intermediaries. A significant consequence was the rise in power and influence of a class of rich peasants and village headmen, known as jotedars, especially in North Bengal. Jotedars controlled large tracts of land, often subletting to poorer peasants, and wielded considerable authority in the villages, often challenging the zamindars&#8217; power.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\nThe Permanent Settlement significantly restructured land relations and social hierarchy in Bengal, leading to the emergence of new power centers like the jotedars.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nOption A is incorrect as zamindars generally did not invest in agricultural improvement; their primary interest was revenue extraction. Option C is incorrect; ryots often suffered from high rents and eviction under the new system. Option D is incorrect; the Collectorate system became a powerful instrument of British administration for revenue collection and control.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in Bengal ? [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;The zamindars invested capital and enterprise to improve agriculture along lines of British yeoman farmers&#8221; option2=&#8221;A group of rich peasants known as jotedars succeeded in consolidating their position in the villages&#8221; option3=&#8221;The ryots prospered as a result of fixed revenue levy &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in B\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/#more-88687\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in B<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1094],"tags":[1288,1264,1124],"class_list":["post-88687","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-nda-2","tag-1288","tag-economic-impact-of-british-rule-on-india","tag-modern-history-of-india","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in B<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Permanent Settlement (1793) fixed the land revenue in Bengal, granting proprietary rights to the zamindars. This system, however, often led to absenteeism among zamindars and the growth of intermediaries. A significant consequence was the rise in power and influence of a class of rich peasants and village headmen, known as jotedars, especially in North Bengal. Jotedars controlled large tracts of land, often subletting to poorer peasants, and wielded considerable authority in the villages, often challenging the zamindars&#039; power. The Permanent Settlement significantly restructured land relations and social hierarchy in Bengal, leading to the emergence of new power centers like the jotedars.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in B\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Permanent Settlement (1793) fixed the land revenue in Bengal, granting proprietary rights to the zamindars. This system, however, often led to absenteeism among zamindars and the growth of intermediaries. A significant consequence was the rise in power and influence of a class of rich peasants and village headmen, known as jotedars, especially in North Bengal. Jotedars controlled large tracts of land, often subletting to poorer peasants, and wielded considerable authority in the villages, often challenging the zamindars&#039; power. The Permanent Settlement significantly restructured land relations and social hierarchy in Bengal, leading to the emergence of new power centers like the jotedars.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T07:18:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in B","description":"The Permanent Settlement (1793) fixed the land revenue in Bengal, granting proprietary rights to the zamindars. This system, however, often led to absenteeism among zamindars and the growth of intermediaries. A significant consequence was the rise in power and influence of a class of rich peasants and village headmen, known as jotedars, especially in North Bengal. Jotedars controlled large tracts of land, often subletting to poorer peasants, and wielded considerable authority in the villages, often challenging the zamindars' power. The Permanent Settlement significantly restructured land relations and social hierarchy in Bengal, leading to the emergence of new power centers like the jotedars.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in B","og_description":"The Permanent Settlement (1793) fixed the land revenue in Bengal, granting proprietary rights to the zamindars. This system, however, often led to absenteeism among zamindars and the growth of intermediaries. A significant consequence was the rise in power and influence of a class of rich peasants and village headmen, known as jotedars, especially in North Bengal. Jotedars controlled large tracts of land, often subletting to poorer peasants, and wielded considerable authority in the villages, often challenging the zamindars' power. The Permanent Settlement significantly restructured land relations and social hierarchy in Bengal, leading to the emergence of new power centers like the jotedars.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T07:18:19+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/","name":"What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in B","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T07:18:19+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T07:18:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The Permanent Settlement (1793) fixed the land revenue in Bengal, granting proprietary rights to the zamindars. This system, however, often led to absenteeism among zamindars and the growth of intermediaries. A significant consequence was the rise in power and influence of a class of rich peasants and village headmen, known as jotedars, especially in North Bengal. Jotedars controlled large tracts of land, often subletting to poorer peasants, and wielded considerable authority in the villages, often challenging the zamindars' power. The Permanent Settlement significantly restructured land relations and social hierarchy in Bengal, leading to the emergence of new power centers like the jotedars.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/what-was-the-consequence-of-permanent-settlement-on-rural-society-in-b\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC NDA-2","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-nda-2\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"What was the consequence of Permanent Settlement on rural society in B"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88687","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=88687"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/88687\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=88687"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=88687"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=88687"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}