{"id":87434,"date":"2025-06-01T06:44:08","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T06:44:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=87434"},"modified":"2025-06-01T06:44:08","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T06:44:08","slug":"which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/","title":{"rendered":"Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010?\n1."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010?<br \/>\n1. Permission of 100 percent FDI in the automotive sector.<br \/>\n2. Permitting foreign airlines to make FDI up to 49 percent.<br \/>\n3. Permission of up to 51 percent FDI under the government approval route in multi-brand retailing, subject to specified conditions.<br \/>\n4. Amendment of policy on FDI in single-brand product retail trading for aligning with global practices.<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;1 only&#8221; option2=&#8221;2 and 4 only&#8221; option3=&#8221;1 and 2 only&#8221; option4=&#8221;1, 2 and 3 only&#8221; correct=&#8221;option1&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC NDA-1 &#8211; 2016<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-nda-1-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-nda-1-2016\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nThe question asks which statement describes a policy that was *not* a change after 2010.<br \/>\nStatement 1: Permission of 100% FDI in the automotive sector was already permitted under the automatic route well before 2010. Therefore, this was not a policy change *after* 2010.<br \/>\nStatement 2: Permitting foreign airlines to make FDI up to 49% in domestic carriers was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010.<br \/>\nStatement 3: Permitting up to 51% FDI under the government approval route in multi-brand retail was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010.<br \/>\nStatement 4: Amendment of policy on FDI in single-brand retail trading for aligning with global practices has seen changes *after* 2010 (e.g., further liberalization to 100% under automatic route with certain conditions).<\/p>\n<p>Thus, only statement 1 describes a policy situation that existed before 2010 and was not a *new* change after 2010 among the options listed.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\n&#8211; FDI policies are frequently reviewed and amended by the Government of India.<br \/>\n&#8211; Specific sector caps and approval routes change over time.<br \/>\n&#8211; 100% FDI in the automotive sector under the automatic route has been a longstanding policy.<br \/>\n&#8211; Permitting FDI in sectors like multi-brand retail and by foreign airlines were significant policy shifts made after 2010.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nFDI policy changes are announced by the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT) and are a key aspect of India&#8217;s economic reforms. The dates mentioned for statements 2 and 3 (September 2012) mark significant liberalization steps in those sectors. Subsequent amendments in single-brand retail also occurred after 2010, making statement 4 a change after 2010 as well.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010? 1. Permission of 100 percent FDI in the automotive sector. 2. Permitting foreign airlines to make FDI up to 49 percent. 3. Permission of up to 51 percent FDI under the government approval route in multi-brand retailing, subject to specified conditions. 4. Amendment of &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010?\n1.\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/#more-87434\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010?<br \/>\n1.<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1093],"tags":[1098,1226],"class_list":["post-87434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-nda-1","tag-1098","tag-external-sector-of-economy","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010? 1.<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The question asks which statement describes a policy that was *not* a change after 2010. Statement 1: Permission of 100% FDI in the automotive sector was already permitted under the automatic route well before 2010. Therefore, this was not a policy change *after* 2010. Statement 2: Permitting foreign airlines to make FDI up to 49% in domestic carriers was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010. Statement 3: Permitting up to 51% FDI under the government approval route in multi-brand retail was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010. Statement 4: Amendment of policy on FDI in single-brand retail trading for aligning with global practices has seen changes *after* 2010 (e.g., further liberalization to 100% under automatic route with certain conditions). Thus, only statement 1 describes a policy situation that existed before 2010 and was not a *new* change after 2010 among the options listed. - FDI policies are frequently reviewed and amended by the Government of India. - Specific sector caps and approval routes change over time. - 100% FDI in the automotive sector under the automatic route has been a longstanding policy. - Permitting FDI in sectors like multi-brand retail and by foreign airlines were significant policy shifts made after 2010.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010? 1.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The question asks which statement describes a policy that was *not* a change after 2010. Statement 1: Permission of 100% FDI in the automotive sector was already permitted under the automatic route well before 2010. Therefore, this was not a policy change *after* 2010. Statement 2: Permitting foreign airlines to make FDI up to 49% in domestic carriers was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010. Statement 3: Permitting up to 51% FDI under the government approval route in multi-brand retail was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010. Statement 4: Amendment of policy on FDI in single-brand retail trading for aligning with global practices has seen changes *after* 2010 (e.g., further liberalization to 100% under automatic route with certain conditions). Thus, only statement 1 describes a policy situation that existed before 2010 and was not a *new* change after 2010 among the options listed. - FDI policies are frequently reviewed and amended by the Government of India. - Specific sector caps and approval routes change over time. - 100% FDI in the automotive sector under the automatic route has been a longstanding policy. - Permitting FDI in sectors like multi-brand retail and by foreign airlines were significant policy shifts made after 2010.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T06:44:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"2 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010? 1.","description":"The question asks which statement describes a policy that was *not* a change after 2010. Statement 1: Permission of 100% FDI in the automotive sector was already permitted under the automatic route well before 2010. Therefore, this was not a policy change *after* 2010. Statement 2: Permitting foreign airlines to make FDI up to 49% in domestic carriers was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010. Statement 3: Permitting up to 51% FDI under the government approval route in multi-brand retail was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010. Statement 4: Amendment of policy on FDI in single-brand retail trading for aligning with global practices has seen changes *after* 2010 (e.g., further liberalization to 100% under automatic route with certain conditions). Thus, only statement 1 describes a policy situation that existed before 2010 and was not a *new* change after 2010 among the options listed. - FDI policies are frequently reviewed and amended by the Government of India. - Specific sector caps and approval routes change over time. - 100% FDI in the automotive sector under the automatic route has been a longstanding policy. - Permitting FDI in sectors like multi-brand retail and by foreign airlines were significant policy shifts made after 2010.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010? 1.","og_description":"The question asks which statement describes a policy that was *not* a change after 2010. Statement 1: Permission of 100% FDI in the automotive sector was already permitted under the automatic route well before 2010. Therefore, this was not a policy change *after* 2010. Statement 2: Permitting foreign airlines to make FDI up to 49% in domestic carriers was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010. Statement 3: Permitting up to 51% FDI under the government approval route in multi-brand retail was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010. Statement 4: Amendment of policy on FDI in single-brand retail trading for aligning with global practices has seen changes *after* 2010 (e.g., further liberalization to 100% under automatic route with certain conditions). Thus, only statement 1 describes a policy situation that existed before 2010 and was not a *new* change after 2010 among the options listed. - FDI policies are frequently reviewed and amended by the Government of India. - Specific sector caps and approval routes change over time. - 100% FDI in the automotive sector under the automatic route has been a longstanding policy. - Permitting FDI in sectors like multi-brand retail and by foreign airlines were significant policy shifts made after 2010.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T06:44:08+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"2 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/","name":"Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010? 1.","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T06:44:08+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T06:44:08+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The question asks which statement describes a policy that was *not* a change after 2010. Statement 1: Permission of 100% FDI in the automotive sector was already permitted under the automatic route well before 2010. Therefore, this was not a policy change *after* 2010. Statement 2: Permitting foreign airlines to make FDI up to 49% in domestic carriers was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010. Statement 3: Permitting up to 51% FDI under the government approval route in multi-brand retail was a policy change implemented in September 2012. This occurred *after* 2010. Statement 4: Amendment of policy on FDI in single-brand retail trading for aligning with global practices has seen changes *after* 2010 (e.g., further liberalization to 100% under automatic route with certain conditions). Thus, only statement 1 describes a policy situation that existed before 2010 and was not a *new* change after 2010 among the options listed. - FDI policies are frequently reviewed and amended by the Government of India. - Specific sector caps and approval routes change over time. - 100% FDI in the automotive sector under the automatic route has been a longstanding policy. - Permitting FDI in sectors like multi-brand retail and by foreign airlines were significant policy shifts made after 2010.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-of-the-following-is-are-not-fdi-policy-changes-after-20101\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC NDA-1","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-nda-1\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which of the following is\/are not FDI policy change(s) after 2010? 1."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=87434"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/87434\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=87434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=87434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=87434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}