{"id":86827,"date":"2025-06-01T04:21:32","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T04:21:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=86827"},"modified":"2025-06-01T04:21:32","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T04:21:32","slug":"which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Which one of the following statements about Government of India Act, 1"},"content":{"rendered":"

Which one of the following statements about Government of India Act, 1935 is NOT correct?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”The federal part of the Act was quickly implemented” option2=”The Congress decided to participate in the elections under the new Act” option3=”Only Bengal and Punjab had non-Congress ministries” option4=”Congress formed coalition Governments in two provinces” correct=”option1″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC Geoscientist – 2021<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe Government of India Act, 1935, proposed a federation of British Indian provinces and princely states. However, the federal part of the Act, which dealt with the centre and the accession of princely states, was never implemented. The princely states were reluctant to join, and the political climate did not favour its establishment. Therefore, the statement that the federal part was quickly implemented is NOT correct.
\n<\/section>\n
\nThe Government of India Act, 1935, was a complex legislation with provincial autonomy being implemented (leading to elections in 1937), while the federal part remained unimplemented.
\n<\/section>\n
\nThe Congress decided to participate in the elections held under the provincial part of the Act in 1937 and formed ministries in several provinces. Following these elections, Congress formed clear majority governments in 5 provinces and coalition governments in others. Provinces like Bengal and Punjab had non-Congress ministries, such as the Krishak Praja Party-Muslim League coalition in Bengal and the Unionist Party in Punjab.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Which one of the following statements about Government of India Act, 1935 is NOT correct? [amp_mcq option1=”The federal part of the Act was quickly implemented” option2=”The Congress decided to participate in the elections under the new Act” option3=”Only Bengal and Punjab had non-Congress ministries” option4=”Congress formed coalition Governments in two provinces” correct=”option1″] This question was … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionWhich one of the following statements about Government of India Act, 1<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1091],"tags":[1110,1194,1124],"class_list":["post-86827","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-geoscientist","tag-1110","tag-constitutional-development-of-india","tag-modern-history-of-india","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nWhich one of the following statements about Government of India Act, 1<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The Government of India Act, 1935, proposed a federation of British Indian provinces and princely states. However, the federal part of the Act, which dealt with the centre and the accession of princely states, was never implemented. The princely states were reluctant to join, and the political climate did not favour its establishment. Therefore, the statement that the federal part was quickly implemented is NOT correct. The Government of India Act, 1935, was a complex legislation with provincial autonomy being implemented (leading to elections in 1937), while the federal part remained unimplemented.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Which one of the following statements about Government of India Act, 1\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The Government of India Act, 1935, proposed a federation of British Indian provinces and princely states. However, the federal part of the Act, which dealt with the centre and the accession of princely states, was never implemented. The princely states were reluctant to join, and the political climate did not favour its establishment. Therefore, the statement that the federal part was quickly implemented is NOT correct. The Government of India Act, 1935, was a complex legislation with provincial autonomy being implemented (leading to elections in 1937), while the federal part remained unimplemented.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T04:21:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Which one of the following statements about Government of India Act, 1","description":"The Government of India Act, 1935, proposed a federation of British Indian provinces and princely states. However, the federal part of the Act, which dealt with the centre and the accession of princely states, was never implemented. The princely states were reluctant to join, and the political climate did not favour its establishment. Therefore, the statement that the federal part was quickly implemented is NOT correct. The Government of India Act, 1935, was a complex legislation with provincial autonomy being implemented (leading to elections in 1937), while the federal part remained unimplemented.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Which one of the following statements about Government of India Act, 1","og_description":"The Government of India Act, 1935, proposed a federation of British Indian provinces and princely states. However, the federal part of the Act, which dealt with the centre and the accession of princely states, was never implemented. The princely states were reluctant to join, and the political climate did not favour its establishment. Therefore, the statement that the federal part was quickly implemented is NOT correct. The Government of India Act, 1935, was a complex legislation with provincial autonomy being implemented (leading to elections in 1937), while the federal part remained unimplemented.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T04:21:32+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1\/","name":"Which one of the following statements about Government of India Act, 1","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T04:21:32+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T04:21:32+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The Government of India Act, 1935, proposed a federation of British Indian provinces and princely states. However, the federal part of the Act, which dealt with the centre and the accession of princely states, was never implemented. The princely states were reluctant to join, and the political climate did not favour its establishment. Therefore, the statement that the federal part was quickly implemented is NOT correct. The Government of India Act, 1935, was a complex legislation with provincial autonomy being implemented (leading to elections in 1937), while the federal part remained unimplemented.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/which-one-of-the-following-statements-about-government-of-india-act-1\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC Geoscientist","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-geoscientist\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Which one of the following statements about Government of India Act, 1"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86827","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86827"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86827\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86827"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86827"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86827"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}