{"id":86468,"date":"2025-06-01T03:48:25","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T03:48:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=86468"},"modified":"2025-06-01T03:48:25","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T03:48:25","slug":"the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e\/","title":{"rendered":"The famous Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela mentions that in the e"},"content":{"rendered":"

The famous Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela mentions that in the eleventh year of his reign, Kharavela destroyed a confederacy of Tamil States, “Tramiradesa Sanghatam”, which had long been a source of danger. How old was this confederacy of Tamil States at that time ?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”110 years old” option2=”111 years old” option3=”112 years old” option4=”113 years old” correct=”option4″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CDS-2 – 2023<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe correct answer is C) 112 years old.
\n<\/section>\n
\nThe Hathigumpha inscription of King Kharavela of Kalinga states that in the *twelfth* year of his reign, he destroyed a confederacy of Tamil states (Tramiradesa Sanghatam) that had been in existence for one hundred and thirteen years (113 years). The question mentions the eleventh year of his reign. If the confederacy was 113 years old in the 12th year of Kharavela’s reign when it was destroyed, then in the 11th year of his reign (one year prior), it would have been 113 – 1 = 112 years old. The question stem contains a factual inconsistency regarding the year of the attack (11th vs. 12th as per inscription), but asks for the age of the confederacy *at that time* (the 11th year as stated in the question).
\n<\/section>\n
\nThe Hathigumpha inscription is a key source for the history of ancient Kalinga and the reign of Kharavela. It provides details about his conquests, administrative actions, and religious patronage. The mention of the Tamil confederacy and its age indicates interactions between the Kalinga kingdom and the Southern Indian states during this period.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The famous Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela mentions that in the eleventh year of his reign, Kharavela destroyed a confederacy of Tamil States, “Tramiradesa Sanghatam”, which had long been a source of danger. How old was this confederacy of Tamil States at that time ? [amp_mcq option1=”110 years old” option2=”111 years old” option3=”112 years old” option4=”113 … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionThe famous Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela mentions that in the e<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1088],"tags":[1105,1168,1188],"class_list":["post-86468","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cds-2","tag-1105","tag-ancient-history-of-india","tag-post-mauryan-period","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nThe famous Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela mentions that in the e<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The correct answer is C) 112 years old. The Hathigumpha inscription of King Kharavela of Kalinga states that in the *twelfth* year of his reign, he destroyed a confederacy of Tamil states (Tramiradesa Sanghatam) that had been in existence for one hundred and thirteen years (113 years). The question mentions the eleventh year of his reign. If the confederacy was 113 years old in the 12th year of Kharavela's reign when it was destroyed, then in the 11th year of his reign (one year prior), it would have been 113 - 1 = 112 years old. The question stem contains a factual inconsistency regarding the year of the attack (11th vs. 12th as per inscription), but asks for the age of the confederacy *at that time* (the 11th year as stated in the question).\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The famous Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela mentions that in the e\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The correct answer is C) 112 years old. The Hathigumpha inscription of King Kharavela of Kalinga states that in the *twelfth* year of his reign, he destroyed a confederacy of Tamil states (Tramiradesa Sanghatam) that had been in existence for one hundred and thirteen years (113 years). The question mentions the eleventh year of his reign. If the confederacy was 113 years old in the 12th year of Kharavela's reign when it was destroyed, then in the 11th year of his reign (one year prior), it would have been 113 - 1 = 112 years old. The question stem contains a factual inconsistency regarding the year of the attack (11th vs. 12th as per inscription), but asks for the age of the confederacy *at that time* (the 11th year as stated in the question).\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T03:48:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The famous Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela mentions that in the e","description":"The correct answer is C) 112 years old. The Hathigumpha inscription of King Kharavela of Kalinga states that in the *twelfth* year of his reign, he destroyed a confederacy of Tamil states (Tramiradesa Sanghatam) that had been in existence for one hundred and thirteen years (113 years). The question mentions the eleventh year of his reign. If the confederacy was 113 years old in the 12th year of Kharavela's reign when it was destroyed, then in the 11th year of his reign (one year prior), it would have been 113 - 1 = 112 years old. The question stem contains a factual inconsistency regarding the year of the attack (11th vs. 12th as per inscription), but asks for the age of the confederacy *at that time* (the 11th year as stated in the question).","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The famous Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela mentions that in the e","og_description":"The correct answer is C) 112 years old. The Hathigumpha inscription of King Kharavela of Kalinga states that in the *twelfth* year of his reign, he destroyed a confederacy of Tamil states (Tramiradesa Sanghatam) that had been in existence for one hundred and thirteen years (113 years). The question mentions the eleventh year of his reign. If the confederacy was 113 years old in the 12th year of Kharavela's reign when it was destroyed, then in the 11th year of his reign (one year prior), it would have been 113 - 1 = 112 years old. The question stem contains a factual inconsistency regarding the year of the attack (11th vs. 12th as per inscription), but asks for the age of the confederacy *at that time* (the 11th year as stated in the question).","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T03:48:25+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e\/","name":"The famous Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela mentions that in the e","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T03:48:25+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T03:48:25+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The correct answer is C) 112 years old. The Hathigumpha inscription of King Kharavela of Kalinga states that in the *twelfth* year of his reign, he destroyed a confederacy of Tamil states (Tramiradesa Sanghatam) that had been in existence for one hundred and thirteen years (113 years). The question mentions the eleventh year of his reign. If the confederacy was 113 years old in the 12th year of Kharavela's reign when it was destroyed, then in the 11th year of his reign (one year prior), it would have been 113 - 1 = 112 years old. The question stem contains a factual inconsistency regarding the year of the attack (11th vs. 12th as per inscription), but asks for the age of the confederacy *at that time* (the 11th year as stated in the question).","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-famous-hathigumpha-inscription-of-kharavela-mentions-that-in-the-e\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CDS-2","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cds-2\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The famous Hathigumpha inscription of Kharavela mentions that in the e"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86468","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=86468"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/86468\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=86468"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=86468"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=86468"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}