{"id":85622,"date":"2025-06-01T03:23:04","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T03:23:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=85622"},"modified":"2025-06-01T03:23:04","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T03:23:04","slug":"statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/","title":{"rendered":"Statement I :\nThe Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Statement I :<br \/>\nThe Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India.<\/p>\n<p>Statement II :<br \/>\nThe Zamindars often received the support of the peasantry in a large number of agrarian uprisings in North India in the seventeenth century.<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I&#8221; option2=&#8221;Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I&#8221; option3=&#8221;Statement I is true but Statement II is false&#8221; option4=&#8221;Statement I is false but Statement II is true&#8221; correct=&#8221;option2&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC CDS-2 &#8211; 2016<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-cds-2-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-cds-2-2016\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nBoth statements are individually true, but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\n&#8211; Statement I: Zamindars, as intermediaries in the revenue collection system, often extracted surplus from the peasantry beyond the state&#8217;s demand, acting as an exploitative layer, although their role was complex. This statement can be considered true in the context of peasant experience.<br \/>\n&#8211; Statement II: Historical evidence shows that Zamindars sometimes led or supported peasant uprisings against the Mughal state or other powers, motivated by their own grievances or interests. So, peasants did sometimes support Zamindars. This statement is also true.<br \/>\n&#8211; Statement II describes instances of cooperation or support between peasants and Zamindars in uprisings. This does not explain *why* Zamindars were an exploitative class; in fact, it highlights a potentially conflicting aspect of their relationship with the peasantry. Therefore, Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nThe relationship between Zamindars and peasants in Mughal India was complex and varied, ranging from exploitation and conflict to instances of shared resistance against external pressures, particularly state revenue demands or oppression by other groups.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Statement I : The Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India. Statement II : The Zamindars often received the support of the peasantry in a large number of agrarian uprisings in North India in the seventeenth century. [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I&#8221; &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Statement I :\nThe Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/#more-85622\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Statement I :<br \/>\nThe Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1088],"tags":[1098,1122,1253],"class_list":["post-85622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cds-2","tag-1098","tag-medieval-history-of-india","tag-mughal-period-miscellaneous","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Statement I : The Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Both statements are individually true, but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I. - Statement I: Zamindars, as intermediaries in the revenue collection system, often extracted surplus from the peasantry beyond the state&#039;s demand, acting as an exploitative layer, although their role was complex. This statement can be considered true in the context of peasant experience. - Statement II: Historical evidence shows that Zamindars sometimes led or supported peasant uprisings against the Mughal state or other powers, motivated by their own grievances or interests. So, peasants did sometimes support Zamindars. This statement is also true. - Statement II describes instances of cooperation or support between peasants and Zamindars in uprisings. This does not explain *why* Zamindars were an exploitative class; in fact, it highlights a potentially conflicting aspect of their relationship with the peasantry. Therefore, Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Statement I : The Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Both statements are individually true, but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I. - Statement I: Zamindars, as intermediaries in the revenue collection system, often extracted surplus from the peasantry beyond the state&#039;s demand, acting as an exploitative layer, although their role was complex. This statement can be considered true in the context of peasant experience. - Statement II: Historical evidence shows that Zamindars sometimes led or supported peasant uprisings against the Mughal state or other powers, motivated by their own grievances or interests. So, peasants did sometimes support Zamindars. This statement is also true. - Statement II describes instances of cooperation or support between peasants and Zamindars in uprisings. This does not explain *why* Zamindars were an exploitative class; in fact, it highlights a potentially conflicting aspect of their relationship with the peasantry. Therefore, Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T03:23:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Statement I : The Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India","description":"Both statements are individually true, but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I. - Statement I: Zamindars, as intermediaries in the revenue collection system, often extracted surplus from the peasantry beyond the state's demand, acting as an exploitative layer, although their role was complex. This statement can be considered true in the context of peasant experience. - Statement II: Historical evidence shows that Zamindars sometimes led or supported peasant uprisings against the Mughal state or other powers, motivated by their own grievances or interests. So, peasants did sometimes support Zamindars. This statement is also true. - Statement II describes instances of cooperation or support between peasants and Zamindars in uprisings. This does not explain *why* Zamindars were an exploitative class; in fact, it highlights a potentially conflicting aspect of their relationship with the peasantry. Therefore, Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Statement I : The Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India","og_description":"Both statements are individually true, but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I. - Statement I: Zamindars, as intermediaries in the revenue collection system, often extracted surplus from the peasantry beyond the state's demand, acting as an exploitative layer, although their role was complex. This statement can be considered true in the context of peasant experience. - Statement II: Historical evidence shows that Zamindars sometimes led or supported peasant uprisings against the Mughal state or other powers, motivated by their own grievances or interests. So, peasants did sometimes support Zamindars. This statement is also true. - Statement II describes instances of cooperation or support between peasants and Zamindars in uprisings. This does not explain *why* Zamindars were an exploitative class; in fact, it highlights a potentially conflicting aspect of their relationship with the peasantry. Therefore, Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T03:23:04+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/","name":"Statement I : The Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T03:23:04+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T03:23:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Both statements are individually true, but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I. - Statement I: Zamindars, as intermediaries in the revenue collection system, often extracted surplus from the peasantry beyond the state's demand, acting as an exploitative layer, although their role was complex. This statement can be considered true in the context of peasant experience. - Statement II: Historical evidence shows that Zamindars sometimes led or supported peasant uprisings against the Mughal state or other powers, motivated by their own grievances or interests. So, peasants did sometimes support Zamindars. This statement is also true. - Statement II describes instances of cooperation or support between peasants and Zamindars in uprisings. This does not explain *why* Zamindars were an exploitative class; in fact, it highlights a potentially conflicting aspect of their relationship with the peasantry. Therefore, Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-zamindars-were-an-exploitative-class-in-mughal-india\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CDS-2","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cds-2\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Statement I : The Zamindars were an exploitative class in Mughal India"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85622\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}