{"id":85621,"date":"2025-06-01T03:23:03","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T03:23:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=85621"},"modified":"2025-06-01T03:23:03","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T03:23:03","slug":"statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/","title":{"rendered":"Statement I :\nThe pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators c"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Statement I :<br \/>\nThe pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators cultivating lands on a contractual basis.<\/p>\n<p>Statement II :<br \/>\nThe pahi-kashta peasants worked under the temptation of favourable revenue or the compulsion of economic distress.<\/p>\n<p>[amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I&#8221; option2=&#8221;Both the statements are individually true but Statement II is not the correct explanation of Statement I&#8221; option3=&#8221;Statement I is true but Statement II is false&#8221; option4=&#8221;Statement I is false but Statement II is true&#8221; correct=&#8221;option1&#8243;]<\/p>\n<div class=\"psc-box-pyq-exam-year-detail\">\n<div class=\"pyq-exam\">\n<div class=\"psc-heading\">This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n<div class=\"psc-title line-ellipsis\">UPSC CDS-2 &#8211; 2016<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"pyq-exam-psc-buttons\"><a href=\"\/pyq\/pyq-upsc-cds-2-2016.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-pdf-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Download PDF<\/a><a href=\"\/pyq-upsc-cds-2-2016\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"psc-attempt-button\" rel=\"noopener\">Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<section id=\"pyq-correct-answer\">\nBoth statements are individually true, and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-key-points\">\n&#8211; Pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators who tilled land outside their own village. This was often on a contractual basis.<br \/>\n&#8211; They were motivated to cultivate land in other villages either due to favorable terms (like lower revenue demand offered by the village or zamindar seeking cultivators) or due to compulsion stemming from economic distress, lack of sufficient land in their home village, or social pressure. Thus, the factors mentioned in Statement II explain why a peasant would become a pahi-kashta, cultivating land on a contractual basis in a different village.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"pyq-additional-information\">\nIn Mughal India, peasants were generally classified into Khud-kashta (resident cultivators with proprietary rights in their village) and Pahi-kashta (non-resident cultivators). The movement and status of Pahi-kashta peasants reflected economic conditions and land availability.<br \/>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Statement I : The pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators cultivating lands on a contractual basis. Statement II : The pahi-kashta peasants worked under the temptation of favourable revenue or the compulsion of economic distress. [amp_mcq option1=&#8221;Both the statements are individually true and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I&#8221; option2=&#8221;Both the statements are &#8230; <\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more-container\"><a title=\"Statement I :\nThe pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators c\" class=\"read-more button\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/#more-85621\">Detailed Solution<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Statement I :<br \/>\nThe pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators c<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1088],"tags":[1098,1122,1255],"class_list":["post-85621","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cds-2","tag-1098","tag-medieval-history-of-india","tag-mughal-administration","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v22.2 (Yoast SEO v23.3) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Statement I : The pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators c<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Both statements are individually true, and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I. - Pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators who tilled land outside their own village. This was often on a contractual basis. - They were motivated to cultivate land in other villages either due to favorable terms (like lower revenue demand offered by the village or zamindar seeking cultivators) or due to compulsion stemming from economic distress, lack of sufficient land in their home village, or social pressure. Thus, the factors mentioned in Statement II explain why a peasant would become a pahi-kashta, cultivating land on a contractual basis in a different village.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Statement I : The pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators c\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Both statements are individually true, and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I. - Pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators who tilled land outside their own village. This was often on a contractual basis. - They were motivated to cultivate land in other villages either due to favorable terms (like lower revenue demand offered by the village or zamindar seeking cultivators) or due to compulsion stemming from economic distress, lack of sufficient land in their home village, or social pressure. Thus, the factors mentioned in Statement II explain why a peasant would become a pahi-kashta, cultivating land on a contractual basis in a different village.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T03:23:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Statement I : The pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators c","description":"Both statements are individually true, and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I. - Pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators who tilled land outside their own village. This was often on a contractual basis. - They were motivated to cultivate land in other villages either due to favorable terms (like lower revenue demand offered by the village or zamindar seeking cultivators) or due to compulsion stemming from economic distress, lack of sufficient land in their home village, or social pressure. Thus, the factors mentioned in Statement II explain why a peasant would become a pahi-kashta, cultivating land on a contractual basis in a different village.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Statement I : The pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators c","og_description":"Both statements are individually true, and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I. - Pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators who tilled land outside their own village. This was often on a contractual basis. - They were motivated to cultivate land in other villages either due to favorable terms (like lower revenue demand offered by the village or zamindar seeking cultivators) or due to compulsion stemming from economic distress, lack of sufficient land in their home village, or social pressure. Thus, the factors mentioned in Statement II explain why a peasant would become a pahi-kashta, cultivating land on a contractual basis in a different village.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T03:23:03+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/","name":"Statement I : The pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators c","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T03:23:03+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T03:23:03+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"Both statements are individually true, and Statement II is the correct explanation of Statement I. - Pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators who tilled land outside their own village. This was often on a contractual basis. - They were motivated to cultivate land in other villages either due to favorable terms (like lower revenue demand offered by the village or zamindar seeking cultivators) or due to compulsion stemming from economic distress, lack of sufficient land in their home village, or social pressure. Thus, the factors mentioned in Statement II explain why a peasant would become a pahi-kashta, cultivating land on a contractual basis in a different village.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/statement-i-the-pahi-kashta-peasants-were-non-resident-cultivators-c\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CDS-2","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cds-2\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Statement I : The pahi-kashta peasants were non-resident cultivators c"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85621","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85621"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85621\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85621"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85621"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85621"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}