{"id":85407,"date":"2025-06-01T03:16:02","date_gmt":"2025-06-01T03:16:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?p=85407"},"modified":"2025-06-01T03:16:02","modified_gmt":"2025-06-01T03:16:02","slug":"the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence\/","title":{"rendered":"The notion of kinship projected by the Kushana rulers is best evidence"},"content":{"rendered":"

The notion of kinship projected by the Kushana rulers is best evidenced through which of the following?<\/p>\n

[amp_mcq option1=”Their identification with deities” option2=”Grants to religious institutions” option3=”Inscriptional panegyrics” option4=”Coins and sculpture” correct=”option4″]<\/p>\n

\n
\n
This question was previously asked in<\/div>\n
UPSC CDS-1 – 2023<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Download PDF<\/a>Attempt Online<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nThe correct answer is A, Their identification with deities.
\n<\/section>\n
\nKushana rulers, such as Kanishka, projected a strong notion of kinship and authority by associating themselves with various deities from different pantheons (like Buddha, Iranian deities, and Hindu deities). The adoption of titles like ‘Devaputra’ (Son of God), which was inspired by Chinese titles, directly indicates their attempt to project divine lineage or connection to bolster their legitimacy and status. This deliberate identification with deities was a significant way they projected their notion of kinship and power.
\n<\/section>\n
\nWhile coins and sculpture (D) were media used to depict these associations and inscriptions (C) often contained panegyrics, the core notion being projected was their divine connection or identification with powerful deities (A). Grants to religious institutions (B) were also common practice but did not as directly project a specific notion of the ruler’s own kinship or divine status as much as the adoption of divine titles and imagery did.
\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The notion of kinship projected by the Kushana rulers is best evidenced through which of the following? [amp_mcq option1=”Their identification with deities” option2=”Grants to religious institutions” option3=”Inscriptional panegyrics” option4=”Coins and sculpture” correct=”option4″] This question was previously asked in UPSC CDS-1 – 2023 Download PDFAttempt Online The correct answer is A, Their identification with deities. Kushana … <\/p>\n

Detailed SolutionThe notion of kinship projected by the Kushana rulers is best evidence<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1087],"tags":[1105,1168,1188],"class_list":["post-85407","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-upsc-cds-1","tag-1105","tag-ancient-history-of-india","tag-post-mauryan-period","no-featured-image-padding"],"yoast_head":"\nThe notion of kinship projected by the Kushana rulers is best evidence<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"The correct answer is A, Their identification with deities. Kushana rulers, such as Kanishka, projected a strong notion of kinship and authority by associating themselves with various deities from different pantheons (like Buddha, Iranian deities, and Hindu deities). The adoption of titles like 'Devaputra' (Son of God), which was inspired by Chinese titles, directly indicates their attempt to project divine lineage or connection to bolster their legitimacy and status. This deliberate identification with deities was a significant way they projected their notion of kinship and power.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The notion of kinship projected by the Kushana rulers is best evidence\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The correct answer is A, Their identification with deities. Kushana rulers, such as Kanishka, projected a strong notion of kinship and authority by associating themselves with various deities from different pantheons (like Buddha, Iranian deities, and Hindu deities). The adoption of titles like 'Devaputra' (Son of God), which was inspired by Chinese titles, directly indicates their attempt to project divine lineage or connection to bolster their legitimacy and status. This deliberate identification with deities was a significant way they projected their notion of kinship and power.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"MCQ and Quiz for Exams\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-06-01T03:16:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"rawan239\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"1 minute\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The notion of kinship projected by the Kushana rulers is best evidence","description":"The correct answer is A, Their identification with deities. Kushana rulers, such as Kanishka, projected a strong notion of kinship and authority by associating themselves with various deities from different pantheons (like Buddha, Iranian deities, and Hindu deities). The adoption of titles like 'Devaputra' (Son of God), which was inspired by Chinese titles, directly indicates their attempt to project divine lineage or connection to bolster their legitimacy and status. This deliberate identification with deities was a significant way they projected their notion of kinship and power.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The notion of kinship projected by the Kushana rulers is best evidence","og_description":"The correct answer is A, Their identification with deities. Kushana rulers, such as Kanishka, projected a strong notion of kinship and authority by associating themselves with various deities from different pantheons (like Buddha, Iranian deities, and Hindu deities). The adoption of titles like 'Devaputra' (Son of God), which was inspired by Chinese titles, directly indicates their attempt to project divine lineage or connection to bolster their legitimacy and status. This deliberate identification with deities was a significant way they projected their notion of kinship and power.","og_url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence\/","og_site_name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","article_published_time":"2025-06-01T03:16:02+00:00","author":"rawan239","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"rawan239","Est. reading time":"1 minute"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence\/","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence\/","name":"The notion of kinship projected by the Kushana rulers is best evidence","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-06-01T03:16:02+00:00","dateModified":"2025-06-01T03:16:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209"},"description":"The correct answer is A, Their identification with deities. Kushana rulers, such as Kanishka, projected a strong notion of kinship and authority by associating themselves with various deities from different pantheons (like Buddha, Iranian deities, and Hindu deities). The adoption of titles like 'Devaputra' (Son of God), which was inspired by Chinese titles, directly indicates their attempt to project divine lineage or connection to bolster their legitimacy and status. This deliberate identification with deities was a significant way they projected their notion of kinship and power.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/the-notion-of-kinship-projected-by-the-kushana-rulers-is-best-evidence\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"UPSC CDS-1","item":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/category\/upsc-cds-1\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"The notion of kinship projected by the Kushana rulers is best evidence"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#website","url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/","name":"MCQ and Quiz for Exams","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/5807dafeb27d2ec82344d6cbd6c3d209","name":"rawan239","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/761a7274f9cce048fa5b921221e7934820d74514df93ef195a9d22af0c1c9001?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"rawan239"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com"],"url":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/author\/rawan239\/"}]}},"amp_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85407","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=85407"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/85407\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=85407"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=85407"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/exam.pscnotes.com\/mcq\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=85407"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}